Longitudinal fluctuation in mammographic percent density differentiates between interval and screen-detected breast cancer

被引:8
|
作者
Strand, Fredrik [1 ,2 ]
Humphreys, Keith [1 ,3 ]
Eriksson, Mikael [1 ]
Li, Jingmei [1 ,4 ]
Andersson, Therese M. L. [1 ]
Tornberg, Sven [5 ]
Azavedo, Edward [2 ,6 ]
Shepherd, John [7 ]
Hall, Per [1 ]
Czene, Kamila [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, POB 281, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Swedish eSci Res Ctr SeRC, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Genome Inst Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Stockholm Gotland Reg Canc Ctr, Dept Canc Screening, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, UCSF Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
interval cancer; breast cancer; mammography; mammographic density; early detection; cancer screening; longitudinal study; TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS; RISK PREDICTION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.30427
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Interval breast cancer (IC) has a more aggressive phenotype and higher mortality than screen-detected cancer (SDC). In this case-case study, we investigated whether the size of longitudinal fluctuations in mammographic percent density (PD fluctuation) was associated with the ratio of IC versus SDC among screened women with breast cancer. The primary study population consisted of 1,414 postmenopausal breast cancer cases, and the validation population of 1,241 cases. We calculated PD fluctuation as the quadratic mean of deviations between actual PD and the long-term trend estimated by a mixed effects model. In a logistic regression model we examined the association between PD fluctuation and IC versus SDC including adjustments for PD at last screening, age at diagnosis, BMI and hormone replacement therapy. All statistical tests were two-sided. There were 385 IC and 1,029 SDC in the primary study population, with PD fluctuations of 0.44 and 0.41 respectively (p=0.0309). After adjustments, PD fluctuation was associated with an increased ratio of IC versus SDC, with an estimated per-standard deviation odds ratio of 1.17 (95% CI=1.03-1.33), compared to 1.19 (95% CI=1.04-1.38) in the validation population. In screened women with breast cancer, high fluctuation in mammographic percent density was associated with an increased ratio of IC versus SDC. Whether this is entirely related to a reduced mammographic detectability or to a biological phenotype promoting faster tumor growth remains to be elucidated. What's new? Interval breast cancers, tumors that spring up between screenings, tend to be more aggressive and deadly than cancers detected by a mammogram. To find out exactly how breast tissue density affects the likelihood of developing such cancers, these authors combed through mammogram data from thousands of breast cancer patients. Their analysis shows that interval cancers occur more frequently in women whose breast density fluctuates more than usual from screening to screening. It's not yet clear whether this is because of something biologically intrinsic to the tumors, or if changing breast density interferes with mammographic detection of tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 40
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Gilliland, FD
    Joste, N
    Stauber, PM
    Hunt, WC
    Rosenberg, R
    Redlich, G
    Key, CR
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (09) : 743 - 749
  • [22] Molecular comparison of interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Cheasley, Dane
    Li, Na
    Rowley, Simone M.
    Elder, Kenneth
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Loi, Sherene
    Savas, Peter
    Goode, David L.
    Kader, Tanjina
    Zethoven, Magnus
    Semple, Tim
    Fox, Stephen B.
    Pang, Jia-Min
    Byrne, David
    Devereux, Lisa
    Nickson, Carolyn
    Procopio, Pietro
    Lee, Grant
    Hughes, Siobhan
    Saunders, Hugo
    Fujihara, Kenji M.
    Kuykhoven, Keilly
    Connaughton, Jacquie
    James, Paul A.
    Gorringe, Kylie L.
    Campbell, Ian G.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2019, 248 (02): : 243 - 252
  • [23] The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study
    Wanders, Johanna O. P.
    Holland, Katharina
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Veldhuis, Wouter B.
    Mann, Ritse M.
    van Gils, Carla H.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
  • [24] Mammographic and clinical characteristics of different phenotypes of screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a nationwide screening program
    Marisa Baré
    Núria Torà
    Dolores Salas
    Melchor Sentís
    Joana Ferrer
    Josefa Ibáñez
    Raquel Zubizarreta
    Garbiñe Sarriugarte
    Teresa Barata
    Laia Domingo
    Xavier Castells
    Maria Sala
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015, 154 : 403 - 415
  • [25] Mammographic and clinical characteristics of different phenotypes of screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a nationwide screening program
    Bare, Marisa
    Tora, Nuria
    Salas, Dolores
    Sentis, Melchor
    Ferrer, Joana
    Ibanez, Josefa
    Zubizarreta, Raquel
    Sarriugarte, Garbine
    Barata, Teresa
    Domingo, Laia
    Castells, Xavier
    Sala, Maria
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 154 (02) : 403 - 415
  • [26] The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study
    Johanna O. P. Wanders
    Katharina Holland
    Nico Karssemeijer
    Petra H. M. Peeters
    Wouter B. Veldhuis
    Ritse M. Mann
    Carla H. van Gils
    Breast Cancer Research, 19
  • [27] Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme
    Timmermans, Lore
    Bleyen, Luc
    Bacher, Klaus
    Van Herck, Koen
    Lemmens, Kim
    Van Ongeval, Chantal
    Van Steen, Andre
    Martens, Patrick
    De Brabander, Isabel
    Goossens, Mathieu
    Thierens, Hubert
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (09) : 3810 - 3819
  • [28] THE CURRENT DETECTABILITY OF BREAST-CANCER IN A MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING-PROGRAM - A REVIEW OF THE PREVIOUS MAMMOGRAMS OF INTERVAL AND SCREEN-DETECTED CANCERS
    VANDIJCK, JAAM
    VERBEEK, ALM
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    HOLLAND, R
    CANCER, 1993, 72 (06) : 1933 - 1938
  • [29] Screen-detected versus interval cancers: Effect of imaging modality and breast density in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme
    Lore Timmermans
    Luc Bleyen
    Klaus Bacher
    Koen Van Herck
    Kim Lemmens
    Chantal Van Ongeval
    Andre Van Steen
    Patrick Martens
    Isabel De Brabander
    Mathieu Goossens
    Hubert Thierens
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 3810 - 3819
  • [30] Impact of Artificial Intelligence System and Volumetric Density on Risk Prediction of Interval, Screen-Detected, and Advanced Breast Cancer
    Vachon, Celine M.
    Scott, Christopher G.
    Norman, Aaron D.
    Khanani, Sadia A.
    Jensen, Matthew R.
    Hruska, Carrie B.
    Brandt, Kathleen R.
    Winham, Stacey J.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (17) : 3172 - +