Consensus and Objectivity of Legal Argumentation

被引:0
|
作者
Gizbert-Studnicki, Tomasz [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniwersytet Jagiellonski Krakowie, Krakow, Poland
来源
ARGUMENTATION 2012: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF ARGUMENTATION IN LAW | 2012年
关键词
Law; argumentation; objectivity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The requirement of objectivity of legal argumentation appears to be a commonplace. Participants of any legal dispute claim that their arguments "objectively" support the thesis for which they argue. Objectivity is perceived as a value, strongly tied with the concept of the rule of law (as opposed the rule of men), which is fundamental for contemporary democratic orders. The content of the requirement of objectivity remains, however, unclear. Different meanings of the predicate "objective" must be distinguished. Three basic meanings are: "objective" as "mind-independent" (ontological objectivity), "objective" as "valid for everybody" (epistemic objectivity) and "objective" as "impartial" (moral objectivity). For each of those basic meanings certain sub-meanings may be distinguished. The purpose of the presentation is to examine briefly in which sense legal argumentation may be considered as "objective". For this purpose a general structure of argumentation is designed and various senses of objectivity of premises and rules of argumentation are discussed. The stress is put on epistemic objectivity. Selected normative theories of practical and legal argumentation are examined from the perspective of epistemic objectivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Legal Normativism, Argumentation and Logic
    Schumann, Andrew
    Lisanyuk, Elena
    ARGUMENTATION, 2025, 39 (01) : 45 - 81
  • [22] Hypotheses and their dynamics in legal argumentation
    Moguillansky, Martin O.
    Rotolo, Antonino
    Simari, Guillermo R.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2019, 129 : 37 - 55
  • [23] The Evidence in the Light of Legal Argumentation
    Ricaurte, Catherine
    DOXA-CUADERNOS DE FILOSOFIA Y DERECHO, 2023, 46 : 367 - 383
  • [24] Gender perspective in legal argumentation
    Moreno, Silvia Soriano
    Llambi, Custet Maria Rita
    FEMINISMO-S, 2025, (45): : 377 - 382
  • [25] The relevance of style in legal argumentation
    Aranguez Sanchez, Tasia
    ANUARIO DE FILOSOFIA DEL DERECHO, 2018, 34 : 253 - 275
  • [26] Sketch of typology of legal argumentation
    Goltzberg, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE SEMIOTICS OF LAW-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SEMIOTIQUE JURIDIQUE, 2008, 21 (04): : 363 - 375
  • [27] INTERPRETATION, INTEGRATION AND LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
    Parada Vaca, Orlando
    REVISTA BOLIVIANA DE DERECHO, 2008, (06) : 261 - 263
  • [28] Semantic Sting and Legal Argumentation
    Dyrda, Adam
    Gizbert-Studnicki, Tomasz
    ARGUMENTATION 2011: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF ARGUMENTATION IN LAW, 2011, : 63 - 80
  • [29] What is the Theory Legal Argumentation For?
    Atienza, Manuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE SEMIOTICS OF LAW-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SEMIOTIQUE JURIDIQUE, 2020, 33 (01): : 147 - 153
  • [30] Past and future in legal argumentation
    Rodriguez-Toubes Muniz, Joaquin
    CUADERNOS ELECTRONICOS DE FILOSOFIA DEL DERECHO, 2011, (23): : 513 - 535