The Evidence in the Light of Legal Argumentation

被引:0
|
作者
Ricaurte, Catherine [1 ]
机构
[1] USFQ, Valencia, Spain
来源
关键词
Manuel Atienza; legal argumentation; evidence; evidential reasoning; right to reasons;
D O I
10.14198/DOXA2023.46.21
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
In the light of legal argumentation, the main problems posed by evidential reasoning can be clarified. These problems have to do with discovering the truth of the relevant facts of the case in a judicial process; the application of the relevant evidence exclusion rules; the proof inference and its assessment criteria; and, the function of the standard of proof. What is crucial in evidential reasoning is the type of statements that make up the premises and the criteria that can be used for the evaluation of the inference. This accounts for the special relevance of the material dimension in this type of argumentation.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 383
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Legal argumentation and evidence
    Matheson, D
    DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2004, 43 (03) : 607 - 609
  • [2] Legal argumentation and evidence
    Allen, D
    UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO QUARTERLY, 2003, 73 (01) : 113 - 114
  • [3] RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN LEGAL ARGUMENTATION THEORY - DIALECTICAL APPROACHES TO LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
    FETERIS, ET
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE SEMIOTICS OF LAW-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE SEMIOTIQUE JURIDIQUE, 1994, 7 (20): : 133 - 153
  • [4] Legal Argumentation Theory
    Pavcnik, Marijan
    ARCHIV FUR RECHTS- UND SOZIALPHILOSOPHIE, 2024, 110 (01): : 146 - 150
  • [5] THEORY OF LEGAL ARGUMENTATION
    Toledo, Claiudia
    VEREDAS DO DIREITO, 2005, 2 (03): : 47 - 65
  • [6] Argumentation and legal interpretation
    Torres Ortega, Ilsse Carolina
    CUADERNOS ELECTRONICOS DE FILOSOFIA DEL DERECHO, 2018, (37): : 179 - 185
  • [7] The rationality of legal argumentation
    Azuelos-Atias, Sol
    PRAGMATICS & COGNITION, 2009, 17 (02) : 383 - 401
  • [8] Generalization in Legal Argumentation
    Zenker, Frank
    Dahlman, Christian
    Sikstrom, Sverker
    Wahlberg, Lena
    Sarwar, Farhan
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 20 (01) : 80 - 99
  • [9] Limits of Legal Argumentation
    Gizbert-Studnicki, Tomasz
    ARGUMENTATION 2017: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF ARGUMENTATION IN LAW, 2017, 603 : 25 - 38
  • [10] Fundamentals of legal argumentation
    Bench-Capon, T. J. M.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW, 2018, 26 (03) : 307 - 314