Authorising the Release of Data without Consent for Health Research: The Role of Data Custodians and HRECs in Australia

被引:0
|
作者
Flack, Felicity [1 ]
Adams, Carolyn [2 ]
Allen, Judy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Policy & Client Serv, PHRN, Crawley, WA, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Law Sch, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Law Sch, Crawley, WA, Australia
关键词
data linkage; data linkage research; research ethics; data custodians; government-held data; access to data; data sharing; administrative decision-making; administrative data; privacy; MEDICAL-RESEARCH; LINKAGE; CONFIDENTIALITY; INFORMATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In Australia, access to administrative data for research without consent invokes a plethora of governance requirements. Whether these requirements are met is assessed by at least one human research ethics committee (HREC) and each of the custodians of the relevant data collections. In this article, we examined and compared the decision-making processes of data custodians and HRECs. These processes were investigated using three case studies and qualitative interviews with data custodians around Australia. The investigation demonstrated that there was significant overlap and duplication in the review of applications for access to data without consent between HRECs and data custodians. This was the result of overlapping requirements in the relevant legislation and policies with those in the National Statement for Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007 (updated 2018) as well as confusion about the distinct roles of HRECs and data custodians.
引用
收藏
页码:655 / 680
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Transplant Recipient Preferences Regarding Organ Donor Research: Their Role in Consent and use of Their Data
    Lucas, Amanda
    Strachan, Patricia H.
    D'Aragon, Frederick
    Sarti, Aimee J.
    Meade, Maureen O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2023, 18 (04) : 296 - 303
  • [42] Data protection, informed consent, and research - Data Protection Act does not bar medical research
    Room, S
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7453): : 1437 - 1437
  • [43] Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK
    Jones, Linda A.
    Nelder, Jenny R.
    Fryer, Joseph M.
    Alsop, Philip H.
    Geary, Michael R.
    Prince, Mark
    Cardinal, Rudolf N.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [44] Enhancing the value of Research Data in Australia
    Treloar, Andrew
    Wilkinson, Ross
    [J]. ERCIM NEWS, 2015, (100): : 16 - 17
  • [45] Making Research Data Available in Australia
    Burton, Adrian
    Groenewegen, David
    Love, Cynthia
    Treloar, Andrew
    Wilkinson, Ross
    [J]. IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2012, 27 (03) : 40 - 43
  • [46] Health and Access to Health Services for People with Disability in Australia: Data and Data Gaps
    Fortune, Nicola
    Madden, Rosamond H.
    Clifton, Shane
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (21)
  • [47] The role of community consultation in the ethical conduct of research without consent
    Richardson, LD
    Rhodes, R
    Ragin, DF
    Wilets, I
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2006, 6 (03): : 33 - 35
  • [48] Access to routinely collected data for population health research: experiences in Canada and Australia
    Henry, David
    Stehlik, Paulina
    Camacho, Ximena
    Pearson, Sallie-Anne
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 42 (05) : 430 - 433
  • [49] On the duty of the doctor not to disclose athlete doping data without consent
    Griffith, Richard
    McNamee, Mike
    Phillips, Nicola
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT POLICY AND POLITICS, 2011, 3 (02) : 191 - 203
  • [50] DATA SHARING, BIOBANKS AND INFORMED CONSENT: A RESEARCH PARADOX?
    Allen, Clarissa
    Joly, Yann
    Moreno, Palmira Granados
    [J]. MCGILL JOURNAL OF LAW AND HEALTH, 2013, 7 (01): : 85 - 120