Public opinion on sharing data from health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent: an anonymous online survey in the UK

被引:15
|
作者
Jones, Linda A. [1 ]
Nelder, Jenny R. [1 ]
Fryer, Joseph M. [1 ]
Alsop, Philip H.
Geary, Michael R.
Prince, Mark
Cardinal, Rudolf N. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychiat, Cambridge, England
[2] Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Fdn Trust, Liaison Psychiat Serv, Cambridge, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
information management; health informatics; health policy; mental health; DATASHIELD; STIGMA;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057579
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives UK National Health Service/Health and Social Care (NHS/HSC) data are variably shared between healthcare organisations for direct care, and increasingly de-identified for research. Few large-scale studies have examined public opinion on sharing, including of mental health (MH) versus physical health (PH) data. We measured data sharing preferences. Design/setting/interventions/outcomes Pre-registered anonymous online survey, measuring expressed preferences, recruiting February to September 2020. Participants were randomised to one of three framing statements regarding MH versus PH data. Participants Open to all UK residents. Participants numbered 29 275; 40% had experienced an MH condition. Results Most (76%) supported identifiable data sharing for direct clinical care without explicit consent, but 20% opposed this. Preference for clinical/identifiable sharing decreased with geographical distance and was slightly less for MH than PH data, with small framing effects. Preference for research/de-identified data sharing without explicit consent showed the same small PH/MH and framing effects, plus greater preference for sharing structured data than de-identified free text. There was net support for research sharing to the NHS, academic institutions, and national research charities, net ambivalence about sharing to profit-making companies researching treatments, and net opposition to sharing to other companies (similar to sharing publicly). De-identified linkage to non-health data was generally supported, except to data held by private companies. We report demographic influences on preference. A majority (89%) supported a single NHS mechanism to choose uses of their data. Support for data sharing increased during COVID-19. Conclusions Support for healthcare data sharing for direct care without explicit consent is broad but not universal. There is net support for the sharing of de-identified data for research to the NHS, academia, and the charitable sector, but not the commercial sector. A single national NHS-hosted system for patients to control the use of their NHS data for clinical purposes and for research would have broad support.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sharing confidential health data for research purposes in the UK: where are 'publics' in the public interest?
    Sorbie, Annie
    [J]. EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2020, 16 (02): : 249 - 265
  • [2] Experience of clinical services shapes attitudes to mental health data sharing: findings from a UK-wide survey
    Kirkham, E. J.
    Lawrie, S. M.
    Crompton, C. J.
    Iveson, M. H.
    Jenkins, N. D.
    Goerdten, J.
    Beange, I.
    Chan, S. W. Y.
    McIntosh, A.
    Fletcher-Watson, S.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [3] Experience of clinical services shapes attitudes to mental health data sharing: findings from a UK-wide survey
    E. J. Kirkham
    S. M. Lawrie
    C. J. Crompton
    M. H. Iveson
    N. D. Jenkins
    J. Goerdten
    I. Beange
    S. W. Y. Chan
    A. McIntosh
    S. Fletcher-Watson
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 22
  • [4] A cross sectional survey of the UK public to understand use of online ratings and reviews of health services
    van Velthoven, Michelle H.
    Atherton, Helen
    Powell, John
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2018, 101 (09) : 1690 - 1696
  • [5] Sharing Data for Public Health Research by Members of an International Online Diabetes Social Network
    Weitzman, Elissa R.
    Adida, Ben
    Kelemen, Skyler
    Mandl, Kenneth D.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (04):
  • [6] Public health approaches to end-of-life care in the UK: an online survey of palliative care services
    Paul, Sally
    Sallnow, Libby
    [J]. BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2013, 3 (02) : 196 - 199
  • [7] Desperate Times: Protecting the Public From Research Without Consent or Oversight During Public Health Emergencies
    Beach, Mary Catherine
    Lederman, Howard M.
    Singleton, Megan
    Brower, Roy G.
    Carrese, Joseph
    Ford, Daniel E.
    Hansoti, Bhakti
    Hendrix, Craig W.
    Jorgensen, Ellen Verena
    Moore, Richard D.
    Rocca, Philip
    Zenilman, Jonathan M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 173 (11) : 926 - +
  • [8] Patients' Willingness to Provide Their Clinical Data for Research Purposes and Acceptance of Different Consent Models: Findings From a Representative Survey of Patients With Cancer
    Koengeter, Anja
    Schickhardt, Christoph
    Jungkunz, Martin
    Bergbold, Susanne
    Mehlis, Katja
    Winkler, Eva C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (08)
  • [9] Economic and social impacts of COVID-19 and public health measures: results from an anonymous online survey in Thailand, Malaysia, the UK, Italy and Slovenia
    Osterrieder, Anne
    Cuman, Giulia
    Pan-Ngum, Wirichada
    Cheah, Phaik Kin
    Cheah, Phee-Kheng
    Peerawaranun, Pimnara
    Silan, Margherita
    Orazem, Miha
    Perkovic, Ksenija
    Groselj, Urh
    Schneiders, Mira Leonie
    Poomchaichote, Tassawan
    Waithira, Naomi
    Supa-at Asarath
    Naemiratch, Bhensri
    Ruangkajorn, Supanat
    Skof, Lenart
    Kulpijit, Natinee
    Mackworth-Young, Constance R. S.
    Ongkili, Darlene
    Chanviriyavuth, Rita
    Mukaka, Mavuto
    Cheah, Phaik Yeong
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [10] Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies
    Mhairi Aitken
    Jenna de St. Jorre
    Claudia Pagliari
    Ruth Jepson
    Sarah Cunningham-Burley
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 17