Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability

被引:58
|
作者
Bocci, Tommaso [1 ,2 ]
Marceglia, Sara [1 ,3 ]
Vergari, Maurizio [1 ]
Cognetto, Valeria [1 ]
Cogiamanian, Filippo [1 ]
Sartucci, Ferdinando [2 ,4 ]
Priori, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Milano, Dipartimento Fisiopatol Med Chirurg & Trapiant, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Unita Operativa Neurol, Dipartimento Neurosci, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Trieste, Dipartimento Ingn & Architettura, Trieste, Italy
[4] CNR, Ist Neurosci, Pisa, Italy
关键词
direct current stimulation; spinal cord stimulation; spinal cord; corticospinal system; transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor potentials; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; DC STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX; INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CONDUCTION BLOCK; LIMB MOTONEURONS; SILENT PERIOD; ANODAL BLOCK; H-REFLEXES;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00490.2014
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study aimed to assess the effects of thoracic anodal and cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on upper and lower limb corticospinal excitability. Although there have been studies assessing how thoracic tsDCS influences the spinal ascending tract and reflexes, none has assessed the effects of this technique over upper and lower limb corticomotor neuronal connections. In 14 healthy subjects we recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) from abductor hallucis (AH) and hand abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles before (baseline) and at different time points (0 and 30 min) after anodal or cathodal tsDCS (2.5 mA, 20 min, T-9-T-11 level). In 8 of the 14 subjects we also tested the soleus H reflex and the F waves from AH and ADM before and after tsDCS. Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS left the upper limb MEPs and F wave unchanged. Conversely, while leaving lower limb H reflex unchanged, they oppositely affected lower limb MEPs: whereas anodal tsDCS increased resting motor threshold [(mean +/- SE) 107.33 +/- 3.3% increase immediately after tsDCS and 108.37 +/- 3.2% increase 30 min after tsDCS compared with baseline] and had no effects on MEP area and latency, cathodal tsDCS increased MEP area (139.71 +/- 12.9% increase immediately after tsDCS and 132.74 +/- 22.0% increase 30 min after tsDCS compared with baseline) without affecting resting motor threshold and MEP latency. Our results show that tsDCS induces polarity-specific changes in corticospinal excitability that last for >30 min after tsDCS offset and selectively affect responses in lower limb muscles innervated by lumbar and sacral motor neurons.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 446
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation in Idiopathic Restless Legs Patients
    Heide, A. C.
    Winkler, T.
    Helms, H. J.
    Nitsche, M. A.
    Trenkwalder, C.
    Paulus, W.
    Bachmann, C. G.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2014, 7 (05) : 636 - 642
  • [42] Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal DC Stimulation on Plasticity of the Spinal Circuits and Corticospinal Tracts in Humans
    Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
    Fujimoto, Shuhei
    Otaka, Yohei
    Tanaka, Satoshi
    [J]. 2013 6TH INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING (NER), 2013, : 275 - 278
  • [43] Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation shows no effect on paired stimulation suppression of the somatosensory cortex
    Jan H. Bettmann
    Christine H. Meyer-Frießem
    Lauren M. Schweizer
    Lara Schlaffke
    Peter K. Zahn
    Martin Tegenthoff
    Oliver Höffken
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [44] Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation shows no effect on paired stimulation suppression of the somatosensory cortex
    Bettmann, Jan H.
    Meyer-Friessem, Christine H.
    Schweizer, Lauren M.
    Schlaffke, Lara
    Zahn, Peter K.
    Tegenthoff, Martin
    Hoeffken, Oliver
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [45] Stairways to the brain: Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) modulates a cerebellar-cortical network enhancing verb recovery
    Marangolo, Paola
    Fiori, Valentina
    Caltagirone, Carlo
    Incoccia, Chiara
    Gili, Tommaso
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 1727
  • [46] Corticospinal excitability enhancement with simultaneous transcranial near-infrared stimulation and anodal direct current stimulation of motor cortex
    Song, Penghui
    Li, Siran
    Hao, Wensi
    Wei, Min
    Liu, Jianghong
    Lin, Hua
    Hu, Shimin
    Dai, Xiaona
    Wang, Jing
    Wang, Rong
    Wang, Yuping
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 132 (05) : 1018 - 1024
  • [47] Transpinal and Transcortical Stimulation Alter Corticospinal Excitability and Increase Spinal Output
    Knikou, Maria
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (07):
  • [48] Non-linear changes to corticospinal excitability induced with increasing intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation
    Tang, Alexander D.
    Iyer, Kartik K.
    Vallence, Ann-Maree
    Fujiyama, Hakuei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2017, 595 (05): : 1445 - 1446
  • [49] Metaplastic neuromodulation via transcranial direct current stimulation has no effect on corticospinal excitability and neuromuscular fatigue
    Boda, Madison R.
    Otieno, Lavender A.
    Smith, Ashleigh E.
    Goldsworthy, Mitchell R.
    Sidhu, Simranjit K.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 242 (08) : 1999 - 2012
  • [50] Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals
    Takano, Keita
    Katagiri, Natsuki
    Sato, Takatsugu
    Jin, Masafumi
    Koseki, Tadaki
    Kudo, Daisuke
    Yoshida, Kaito
    Tanabe, Shigeo
    Tsujikawa, Masahiro
    Kondo, Kunitsugu
    Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
    [J]. CEREBELLUM, 2023, 22 (05): : 905 - 914