Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability

被引:58
|
作者
Bocci, Tommaso [1 ,2 ]
Marceglia, Sara [1 ,3 ]
Vergari, Maurizio [1 ]
Cognetto, Valeria [1 ]
Cogiamanian, Filippo [1 ]
Sartucci, Ferdinando [2 ,4 ]
Priori, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Milano, Dipartimento Fisiopatol Med Chirurg & Trapiant, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Unita Operativa Neurol, Dipartimento Neurosci, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Trieste, Dipartimento Ingn & Architettura, Trieste, Italy
[4] CNR, Ist Neurosci, Pisa, Italy
关键词
direct current stimulation; spinal cord stimulation; spinal cord; corticospinal system; transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor potentials; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; DC STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX; INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CONDUCTION BLOCK; LIMB MOTONEURONS; SILENT PERIOD; ANODAL BLOCK; H-REFLEXES;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00490.2014
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study aimed to assess the effects of thoracic anodal and cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on upper and lower limb corticospinal excitability. Although there have been studies assessing how thoracic tsDCS influences the spinal ascending tract and reflexes, none has assessed the effects of this technique over upper and lower limb corticomotor neuronal connections. In 14 healthy subjects we recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) from abductor hallucis (AH) and hand abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles before (baseline) and at different time points (0 and 30 min) after anodal or cathodal tsDCS (2.5 mA, 20 min, T-9-T-11 level). In 8 of the 14 subjects we also tested the soleus H reflex and the F waves from AH and ADM before and after tsDCS. Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS left the upper limb MEPs and F wave unchanged. Conversely, while leaving lower limb H reflex unchanged, they oppositely affected lower limb MEPs: whereas anodal tsDCS increased resting motor threshold [(mean +/- SE) 107.33 +/- 3.3% increase immediately after tsDCS and 108.37 +/- 3.2% increase 30 min after tsDCS compared with baseline] and had no effects on MEP area and latency, cathodal tsDCS increased MEP area (139.71 +/- 12.9% increase immediately after tsDCS and 132.74 +/- 22.0% increase 30 min after tsDCS compared with baseline) without affecting resting motor threshold and MEP latency. Our results show that tsDCS induces polarity-specific changes in corticospinal excitability that last for >30 min after tsDCS offset and selectively affect responses in lower limb muscles innervated by lumbar and sacral motor neurons.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 446
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Short Intracortical Inhibition
    Bocci, Tommaso
    Barloscio, Davide
    Vergari, Maurizio
    Di Rollo, Andrea
    Rossi, Simone
    Priori, Alberto
    Sartucci, Ferdinando
    [J]. NEUROMODULATION, 2015, 18 (08): : 686 - 693
  • [32] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting the Entire Motor Network Does Not Increase Corticospinal Excitability
    van der Cruijsen, Joris
    Jonker, Zeb D.
    Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina
    Wijngaarden, Jessica E.
    Tangkau, Ditte A.
    Tulen, Joke H. M.
    Frens, Maarten A.
    Ribbers, Gerard M.
    Selles, Ruud W.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [33] Facilitation of corticospinal tract excitability by transcranial direct current stimulation combined with voluntary grip exercise
    Kim, Gi-Wook
    Ko, Myoung-Hwan
    [J]. NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2013, 548 : 181 - 184
  • [34] Parietal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates primary motor cortex excitability
    Rivera-Urbina, Guadalupe Nathzidy
    Batsikadze, Giorgi
    Molero-Chamizo, Andres
    Paulus, Walter
    Kuo, Min-Fang
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 41 (06) : 845 - 855
  • [35] The effect of current direction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the corticospinal excitability in human brain
    Kaneko, K
    Kawai, S
    Fuchigami, Y
    Morita, H
    Ofuji, A
    [J]. ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 101 (06): : 478 - 482
  • [36] Modeling Electric Fields in Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation: A Clinical Perspective
    Guidetti, Matteo
    Giannoni-Luza, Stefano
    Bocci, Tommaso
    Pacheco-Barrios, Kevin
    Bianchi, Anna Maria
    Parazzini, Marta
    Ionta, Silvio
    Ferrucci, Roberta
    Maiorana, Natale Vincenzo
    Verde, Federico
    Ticozzi, Nicola
    Silani, Vincenzo
    Priori, Alberto
    [J]. BIOMEDICINES, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [37] Modulation of human corticospinal excitability by paired associative stimulation
    Carson, Richard G.
    Kennedy, Niamh C.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [38] Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation improves locomotor learning in healthy humans
    Awosika, Oluwole O.
    Sandrini, Marco
    Volochayev, Rita
    Thompson, Ryan M.
    Fishman, Nathan
    Wu, Tianxia
    Floeter, Mary Kay
    Hallett, Mark
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (03) : 628 - 634
  • [39] Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans
    Cogiamanian, Filippo
    Vergari, Maurizio
    Pulecchi, Francesca
    Marceglia, Sara
    Priori, Alberto
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (11) : 2636 - 2640
  • [40] Modelling of the Temperature Changes Induced by Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS)
    Fiocchi, Serena
    Chiaramello, Emma
    Priori, Alberto
    Ravazzani, Paolo
    Parazzini, Marta
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF ELECTROMAGNETICS RF AND MICROWAVES IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 5 (01): : 9 - 16