Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability

被引:58
|
作者
Bocci, Tommaso [1 ,2 ]
Marceglia, Sara [1 ,3 ]
Vergari, Maurizio [1 ]
Cognetto, Valeria [1 ]
Cogiamanian, Filippo [1 ]
Sartucci, Ferdinando [2 ,4 ]
Priori, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ca Granda Osped Maggiore Milano, Dipartimento Fisiopatol Med Chirurg & Trapiant, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Pisa, Unita Operativa Neurol, Dipartimento Neurosci, Pisa, Italy
[3] Univ Trieste, Dipartimento Ingn & Architettura, Trieste, Italy
[4] CNR, Ist Neurosci, Pisa, Italy
关键词
direct current stimulation; spinal cord stimulation; spinal cord; corticospinal system; transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor potentials; TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; DC STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX; INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; CONDUCTION BLOCK; LIMB MOTONEURONS; SILENT PERIOD; ANODAL BLOCK; H-REFLEXES;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00490.2014
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study aimed to assess the effects of thoracic anodal and cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) on upper and lower limb corticospinal excitability. Although there have been studies assessing how thoracic tsDCS influences the spinal ascending tract and reflexes, none has assessed the effects of this technique over upper and lower limb corticomotor neuronal connections. In 14 healthy subjects we recorded motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) from abductor hallucis (AH) and hand abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles before (baseline) and at different time points (0 and 30 min) after anodal or cathodal tsDCS (2.5 mA, 20 min, T-9-T-11 level). In 8 of the 14 subjects we also tested the soleus H reflex and the F waves from AH and ADM before and after tsDCS. Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS left the upper limb MEPs and F wave unchanged. Conversely, while leaving lower limb H reflex unchanged, they oppositely affected lower limb MEPs: whereas anodal tsDCS increased resting motor threshold [(mean +/- SE) 107.33 +/- 3.3% increase immediately after tsDCS and 108.37 +/- 3.2% increase 30 min after tsDCS compared with baseline] and had no effects on MEP area and latency, cathodal tsDCS increased MEP area (139.71 +/- 12.9% increase immediately after tsDCS and 132.74 +/- 22.0% increase 30 min after tsDCS compared with baseline) without affecting resting motor threshold and MEP latency. Our results show that tsDCS induces polarity-specific changes in corticospinal excitability that last for >30 min after tsDCS offset and selectively affect responses in lower limb muscles innervated by lumbar and sacral motor neurons.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 446
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability in chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
    Powell, Elizabeth Salmon
    Carrico, Cheryl
    Salyers, Emily
    Westgate, Philip M.
    Sawaki, Lumy
    [J]. NEUROREHABILITATION, 2018, 43 (02) : 125 - 134
  • [2] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Corticospinal Excitability During Motor Training
    Summers, Rebekah L. S.
    Chen, Mo
    Hatch, Andrea
    Kimberley, Teresa J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [3] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on the Excitability of Corticospinal Axons of the Human Cerebral Cortex
    Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo
    Ranieri, Federico
    Profice, Paolo
    Pilato, Fabio
    Mazzone, Paolo
    Capone, Fioravante
    Insola, Angelo
    Oliviero, Antonio
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (04) : 641 - 643
  • [4] Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases corticospinal transmission and enhances voluntary motor output in humans
    Yamaguchi, Tomofumi
    Beck, Mikkel M.
    Therkildsen, Eva R.
    Svane, Christian
    Forman, Christian
    Lorentzen, Jakob
    Conway, Bernard A.
    Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper
    Geertsen, Svend S.
    Nielsen, Jens B.
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL REPORTS, 2020, 8 (16):
  • [5] Intensity Dependent Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability in Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
    Murray, Lynda M.
    Edwards, Dylan J.
    Ruffini, Giulio
    Labar, Douglas
    Stampas, Argyrios
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Cortes, Mar
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 96 (04): : S114 - S121
  • [6] No robust online effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability
    Pillen, Steven
    Knodel, Nicole
    Hermle, Dominik
    Hanke, Moritz
    Ziemann, Ulf
    Bergmann, Til Ole
    [J]. BRAIN STIMULATION, 2022, 15 (05) : 1254 - 1268
  • [7] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability
    Lang, N
    Nitsche, MA
    Paulus, W
    Rothwell, JC
    Lemon, RN
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2004, 156 (04) : 439 - 443
  • [8] The effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation delivered with and without high-frequency modulation on spinal and corticospinal excitability
    Massey, Sarah
    Konig, Danielle
    Upadhyay, Pratham
    Evcil, Zehra Beril
    Melin, Rebbekha
    Fatima, Memoona
    Hannah, Ricci
    Duffell, Lynsey
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2024, 48 (03) : 297 - 308
  • [9] Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability
    N. Lang
    M. A. Nitsche
    W. Paulus
    J. C. Rothwell
    R. N. Lemon
    [J]. Experimental Brain Research, 2004, 156 : 439 - 443
  • [10] The Immediate and Short-Term Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Corticospinal Excitability
    Al'joboori, Yazi
    Hannah, Ricci
    Lenham, Francesca
    Borgas, Pia
    Kremers, Charlotte J. P.
    Bunday, Karen L.
    Rothwell, John
    Duffell, Lynsey D.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15