Biota monitoring under the Water Framework Directive: On tissue choice and fish species selection

被引:48
|
作者
Fliedner, Annette [1 ]
Ruedel, Heinz [1 ]
Lohmann, Nina [2 ]
Buchmeier, Georgia [3 ]
Koschorreck, Jan [4 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Mol Biol & Appl Ecol Fraunhofer I, Dept Environm Specimen Bank & Elemental Anal, D-57392 Schmallenberg, Germany
[2] Eurofins GfA Lab Serv GmbH, Neulaender Kamp 1a, D-21079 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Bavarian Environm Agcy LfU, Demollstr 31, D-82407 Wielenbach, Germany
[4] German Environm Agcy Umweltbundesamt, D-06813 Dessau Rosslau, Germany
关键词
Biota monitoring; Priority substances; Fillet-to-whole fish conversion equation; Conversion factor; POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS; PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; PERFLUORINATED COMPOUNDS; PRIORITY SUBSTANCES; STATISTICAL-SURVEY; FLAME RETARDANTS; US LAKES; FOOD-WEB; MERCURY; ACIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study addresses the topic of suitable matrices for chemical analysis in fish monitoring and discusses the effects of data normalization in the context of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). Differences between species are considered by comparing three frequently monitored species of different trophic levels, i.e., chub (Squalius cephalus, n = 28), (bream, Abramis brama, n = 11), and perch (Perca fluviatilis, n = 19) sampled in the German Danube. The WFD priority substances dioxins, furans and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCDD/F + dl-PCB), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE), alpha-hexabromocyclododecane (alpha-HBCDD), hexachlorobenzene (HCB), mercury (Hg), and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) as well as non-dioxin-like (ndl)-PCB were analyzed separately in fillet and carcass and whole body concentrations were calculated. Hg was analyzed in individual fish fillets and carcasses, all other substances were determined in pool samples, which were compiled on the basis of fish size (3 chub pools, 1 bream pool, 2 perch pools). The data were normalized to 5% lipid weight (or 26% dry mass in the case of Hg and PFOS) for comparison between matrices and species. Hg concentrations were generally higher in fillet than in whole fish (mean whole fish-to-fillet ratio: 0.7) whereas all other substances were mostly higher in whole fish. In the case of lipophilic substances these differences leveled after lipid normalization. Significant correlations (p <= .05) were detected between Hg and fish weight and age. Hg concentrations varied least among younger fish. PCDDIF, dl-PCB, ndl-PCB, PBDE, alpha-HBCDD and HCB correlated significantly (p <= .05) with lipid concentrations. Fillet-to-whole fish conversion equations and/or conversion factors were derived for all substances except alpha-HCBDD. Although more data also for individual fish would be desirable the results are nevertheless a step on the way to translate fillet concentrations of priority substances to whole fish concentrations. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 140
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive
    Wernersson, Ann-Sofie
    Carere, Mario
    Maggi, Chiara
    Tusil, Petr
    Soldan, Premysl
    James, Alice
    Sanchez, Wilfried
    Dulio, Valeria
    Broeg, Katja
    Reifferscheid, Georg
    Buchinger, Sebastian
    Maas, Hannie
    Van Der Grinten, Esther
    O'Toole, Simon
    Ausili, Antonella
    Manfra, Loredana
    Marziali, Laura
    Polesello, Stefano
    Lacchetti, Ines
    Mancini, Laura
    Lilja, Karl
    Linderoth, Maria
    Lundeberg, Tove
    Fjallborg, Bengt
    Porsbring, Tobias
    Larsson, D. G. Joakim
    Bengtsson-Palme, Johan
    Forlin, Lars
    Kienle, Cornelia
    Kunz, Petra
    Vermeirssen, Etienne
    Werner, Inge
    Robinson, Craig D.
    Lyons, Brett
    Katsiadaki, Ioanna
    Whalley, Caroline
    den Haan, Klaas
    Messiaen, Marlies
    Clayton, Helen
    Lettieri, Teresa
    Carvalho, Raquel Negrao
    Gawlik, Bernd Manfred
    Hollert, Henner
    Di Paolo, Carolina
    Brack, Werner
    Kammann, Ulrike
    Kase, Robert
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2015, 27 : 1 - 11
  • [42] The European technical report on aquatic effect-based monitoring tools under the water framework directive
    Ann-Sofie Wernersson
    Mario Carere
    Chiara Maggi
    Petr Tusil
    Premysl Soldan
    Alice James
    Wilfried Sanchez
    Valeria Dulio
    Katja Broeg
    Georg Reifferscheid
    Sebastian Buchinger
    Hannie Maas
    Esther Van Der Grinten
    Simon O’Toole
    Antonella Ausili
    Loredana Manfra
    Laura Marziali
    Stefano Polesello
    Ines Lacchetti
    Laura Mancini
    Karl Lilja
    Maria Linderoth
    Tove Lundeberg
    Bengt Fjällborg
    Tobias Porsbring
    DG Joakim Larsson
    Johan Bengtsson-Palme
    Lars Förlin
    Cornelia Kienle
    Petra Kunz
    Etienne Vermeirssen
    Inge Werner
    Craig D Robinson
    Brett Lyons
    Ioanna Katsiadaki
    Caroline Whalley
    Klaas den Haan
    Marlies Messiaen
    Helen Clayton
    Teresa Lettieri
    Raquel Negrão Carvalho
    Bernd Manfred Gawlik
    Henner Hollert
    Carolina Di Paolo
    Werner Brack
    Ulrike Kammann
    Robert Kase
    Environmental Sciences Europe, 2015, 27
  • [43] Choice of biota in stream assessment and monitoring programs in tropical streams: A comparison of diatoms, macroinvertebrates and fish
    Mangadze, Tinotenda
    Bere, Taurai
    Mwedzi, Tongayi
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 63 : 128 - 143
  • [44] Monitoring priority substances in biota under the Water Framework Directive: how effective is a tiered approach based on caged invertebrates? A proof-of-concept study targeting PFOS in French rivers
    Babut, Marc
    Ferrari, Benoit J. D.
    Jame, Patrick
    Assoumani, Azziz
    Lestremau, Francois
    Hette-Tronquart, Nicolas
    Miege, Cecile
    Perceval, Olivier
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2020, 32 (01)
  • [45] Monitoring priority substances in biota under the Water Framework Directive: how effective is a tiered approach based on caged invertebrates? A proof-of-concept study targeting PFOS in French rivers
    Marc Babut
    Benoit J. D. Ferrari
    Patrick Jame
    Azziz Assoumani
    François Lestremau
    Nicolas Hette-Tronquart
    Cécile Miege
    Olivier Perceval
    Environmental Sciences Europe, 2020, 32
  • [46] Groundwater quality monitoring in Italy for the implementation of the EU water framework directive
    Onorati, G.
    Di Meo, T.
    Bussettini, M.
    Fabiani, C.
    Farrace, M. G.
    Fava, A.
    Ferronato, A.
    Mion, F.
    Marchetti, G.
    Martinelli, A.
    Mazzoni, M.
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2006, 31 (17) : 1004 - 1014
  • [47] Determination of tributyltin in whole water matrices under the European Water Framework Directive
    Richter, Janine
    Fettig, Ina
    Philipp, Rosemarie
    Jakubowski, Norbert
    Panne, Ulrich
    Fisicaro, Paola
    Alasonati, Enrica
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2016, 1459 : 112 - 119
  • [48] Priority substances of the European Water Framework Directive:: analytical challenges in monitoring water quality
    Coquery, M
    Morin, A
    Bécue, A
    Lepot, B
    TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 24 (02) : 117 - 127
  • [49] Decision Support for the Selection of Measures according to the Requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive
    Bernd Klauer
    Michael Rode
    Johannes Schiller
    Uwe Franko
    Melanie Mewes
    Water Resources Management, 2012, 26 : 775 - 798
  • [50] Decision Support for the Selection of Measures according to the Requirements of the EU Water Framework Directive
    Klauer, Bernd
    Rode, Michael
    Schiller, Johannes
    Franko, Uwe
    Mewes, Melanie
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2012, 26 (03) : 775 - 798