Biota monitoring under the Water Framework Directive: On tissue choice and fish species selection

被引:48
|
作者
Fliedner, Annette [1 ]
Ruedel, Heinz [1 ]
Lohmann, Nina [2 ]
Buchmeier, Georgia [3 ]
Koschorreck, Jan [4 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Mol Biol & Appl Ecol Fraunhofer I, Dept Environm Specimen Bank & Elemental Anal, D-57392 Schmallenberg, Germany
[2] Eurofins GfA Lab Serv GmbH, Neulaender Kamp 1a, D-21079 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Bavarian Environm Agcy LfU, Demollstr 31, D-82407 Wielenbach, Germany
[4] German Environm Agcy Umweltbundesamt, D-06813 Dessau Rosslau, Germany
关键词
Biota monitoring; Priority substances; Fillet-to-whole fish conversion equation; Conversion factor; POLYBROMINATED DIPHENYL ETHERS; PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; PERFLUORINATED COMPOUNDS; PRIORITY SUBSTANCES; STATISTICAL-SURVEY; FLAME RETARDANTS; US LAKES; FOOD-WEB; MERCURY; ACIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study addresses the topic of suitable matrices for chemical analysis in fish monitoring and discusses the effects of data normalization in the context of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD). Differences between species are considered by comparing three frequently monitored species of different trophic levels, i.e., chub (Squalius cephalus, n = 28), (bream, Abramis brama, n = 11), and perch (Perca fluviatilis, n = 19) sampled in the German Danube. The WFD priority substances dioxins, furans and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCDD/F + dl-PCB), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE), alpha-hexabromocyclododecane (alpha-HBCDD), hexachlorobenzene (HCB), mercury (Hg), and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) as well as non-dioxin-like (ndl)-PCB were analyzed separately in fillet and carcass and whole body concentrations were calculated. Hg was analyzed in individual fish fillets and carcasses, all other substances were determined in pool samples, which were compiled on the basis of fish size (3 chub pools, 1 bream pool, 2 perch pools). The data were normalized to 5% lipid weight (or 26% dry mass in the case of Hg and PFOS) for comparison between matrices and species. Hg concentrations were generally higher in fillet than in whole fish (mean whole fish-to-fillet ratio: 0.7) whereas all other substances were mostly higher in whole fish. In the case of lipophilic substances these differences leveled after lipid normalization. Significant correlations (p <= .05) were detected between Hg and fish weight and age. Hg concentrations varied least among younger fish. PCDDIF, dl-PCB, ndl-PCB, PBDE, alpha-HBCDD and HCB correlated significantly (p <= .05) with lipid concentrations. Fillet-to-whole fish conversion equations and/or conversion factors were derived for all substances except alpha-HCBDD. Although more data also for individual fish would be desirable the results are nevertheless a step on the way to translate fillet concentrations of priority substances to whole fish concentrations. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 140
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Addressing Analytical Challenges of the Environmental Monitoring for the Water Framework Directive: ERM-CE100, a New Biota Certified Reference Material
    Dosis, Ioannis
    Ricci, Marina
    Majoros, Laszlo
    Lava, Roberto
    Emteborg, Hakan
    Held, Andrea
    Emons, Hendrik
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2017, 89 (04) : 2514 - 2521
  • [32] Use of models to support the monitoring requirements in the water framework directive
    Hojberg, Anker Lajer
    Refsgaard, Jens Christian
    van Geer, Frans
    Jorgensen, Lisbeth Flindt
    Zsuffa, Istvan
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (10) : 1649 - 1672
  • [33] Use of Models to Support the Monitoring Requirements in the Water Framework Directive
    Anker Lajer Højberg
    Jens Christian Refsgaard
    Frans van Geer
    Lisbeth Flindt Jørgensen
    István Zsuffa
    Water Resources Management, 2007, 21 : 1649 - 1672
  • [34] The Water Framework Directive requires new tools for a better water quality monitoring
    Philippe, Namour
    Pascal, Breil
    Yohann, Clement
    Gil, De Sousa
    Jean-Pierre, Chanet
    Pierre, Lanteri
    E-WATER, 2012, (01):
  • [35] Report on EU guidance on groundwater monitoring developed under the common implementation strategy of the water framework directive
    Grath, Johannes
    Ward, Rob
    Scheidleder, Andreas
    Quevauviller, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2007, 9 (11): : 1162 - 1175
  • [36] The Water Framework Directive requires new tools for a better water quality monitoring
    Philippe, Namour
    Pascal, Breil
    Yohann, Clément
    Gil, De Sousa
    Jean-Pierre, Chanet
    Pierre, Lanteri
    E-Water, 2012,
  • [37] Classifying ecological status under the European Water Framework Directive: the need for monitoring to account or natural variability
    Irvine, K
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2004, 14 (02) : 107 - 112
  • [38] Evaluation of the chemical status of surface and ground waters under the Water Framework Directive - Quality standards and monitoring
    Quevauviller, Philippe
    HOUILLE BLANCHE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE L EAU, 2009, (04): : 72 - 76
  • [39] Monitoring of Surface Waters in Germany under the Water Framework Directive-A Review of Approaches, Methods and Results
    Arle, Jens
    Mohaupt, Volker
    Kirst, Ingo
    WATER, 2016, 8 (06):
  • [40] Overview of total mercury in the coastal waters of Greece: a decade of monitoring under the Water Framework Directive (WFD)
    Panagopoulou, Georgia
    Paraskevopoulou, Vasiliki
    Yfanti, Anthi
    Chalkiadaki, Olga
    Botsou, Fotini
    Stathopoulou, Eleni
    Zeri, Christina
    Tzempelikou, Eleni
    Dassenakis, Emmanouil
    Scoullos, Michael
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2025, 27 (02):