Assessing molecular interactions with biophysical methods using the validation cross

被引:3
|
作者
Gossert, Alvar D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Mol Biol & Biophys, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Biomol NMR Spect Platform, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
INTERFERENCE COMPOUNDS PAINS; HIGH-AFFINITY LIGANDS; DRUG DISCOVERY; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; FALSE POSITIVES; NMR METHODS; LABEL-FREE; THROUGHPUT; IDENTIFICATION; BINDING;
D O I
10.1042/BST20180271
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
There are numerous methods for studying molecular interactions. However, each method gives rise to false negative- or false positive binding results, stemming from artifacts of the scientific equipment or from shortcomings of the experimental format. To validate an initial positive binding result, additional methods need to be applied to cover the short-comings of the primary experiment. The aim of such a validation procedure is to exclude as many artifacts as possible to confirm that there is a true molecular interaction that meets the standards for publishing or is worth investing considerable resources for follow-up activities in a drug discovery project. To simplify this validation process, a graphical scheme - the validation cross - can be used. This simple graphic is a powerful tool for identifying blind spots of a binding hypothesis, for selecting the most informative combination of methods to reveal artifacts and, in general, for understanding more thoroughly the nature of a validation process. The concept of the validation cross was originally introduced for the validation of protein-ligand interactions by NMR in drug discovery. Here, an attempt is made to expand the concept to further biophysical methods and to generalize it for binary molecular interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 76
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating methods for simulating soybean cultivar responses using cross validation
    Irmak, A
    Jones, JW
    Mavromatis, T
    Welch, SM
    Boote, KJ
    Wilkerson, GG
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2000, 92 (06) : 1140 - 1149
  • [22] Assessing model fit by cross-validation
    Hawkins, DM
    Basak, SC
    Mills, D
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2003, 43 (02): : 579 - 586
  • [23] VALIDATION OF METHODS FOR ASSESSING SOCIAL SKILLS IN CHILDREN
    MATSON, JL
    ESVELDTDAWSON, K
    KAZDIN, AE
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 12 (02): : 174 - 180
  • [24] DETECTION OF PERSISTENT INFECTIONS USING BIOPHYSICAL METHODS
    ANDERSON, NG
    NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE MONOGRAPHS, 1968, (29): : 393 - &
  • [25] Assessing Validation Methods for Building Identification and Extraction
    Wentz, Elizabeth A.
    Zhao, Qunshan
    2015 JOINT URBAN REMOTE SENSING EVENT (JURSE), 2015,
  • [26] Evaluation of different methods for assessing intracellular fluid in healthy older people: A cross-validation study
    Dittmar, M
    Reber, H
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2002, 50 (01) : 104 - 110
  • [27] Guest Editor's Introduction Biophysical methods for the study of protein interactions
    Schuck, Peter
    Zhao, Huaying
    METHODS, 2013, 59 (03) : 259 - 260
  • [28] Biophysical methods for monitoring cell-substrate interactions in drug discovery
    Hug, TS
    ASSAY AND DRUG DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES, 2003, 1 (03) : 479 - 488
  • [29] Biophysical methods to study ligand-receptor interactions of neuropeptide Y
    Beck-Sickinger, AG
    BIOPOLYMERS, 2001, 60 (06) : 420 - 437
  • [30] Biophysical methods to study ligand-receptor interactions of neuropeptide Y
    Bettio, Andrea
    Beck-Sickinger, Annette G.
    Biopolymers - Peptide Science Section, 2001, 60 (06): : 420 - 437