Evaluating methods for simulating soybean cultivar responses using cross validation

被引:33
|
作者
Irmak, A [1 ]
Jones, JW
Mavromatis, T
Welch, SM
Boote, KJ
Wilkerson, GG
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Agron, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[4] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2000.9261140x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Crop simulation models are used in research worldwide, and efforts are now being made to incorporate them into decision-support systems fur farmers and their advisors, However, their on-farm acceptance Kill be limited unless methods can be found to determine model coefficients for new cultivars that are released by public and private breeders. The availability of data to determine coefficients is usually limited; however, soybean breeders routinely collect data far new cultivars from variety trials. Objectives of this research were to (i) estimate soybean crop-model prediction errors for anthesis, maturity, and yield using variety trial data; (ii) determine the effectiveness of cross validation for estimating prediction errors of the soybean model; and (iii) compare these errors with those based on regression equations relating specific cultivar yields to simulated maturity group (MG) yields, Root mean squared errors of prediction (RMSEP) were used for comparisons, Georgia variety trial data from 1987 through 1996 for six MG VII cultivars were divided into sets for fitting model coefficients and independent validation. The RMSEP using cross validation were similar to fitting errors when all (n = 40) or only half of the data were used to fit cultivar coefficients. These errors were similar to those computed using independent data The RMSEP for yield using linear regression were better than using generic MG coefficients but not as good as that found by fitting model coefficients. We conclude that soybean yield tan be simulated for specific cultivars using either crop model or regression approaches, but the latter was not adequate for predicting cultivar anthesis and maturity dates.
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1149
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CULTIVAR RESPONSES TO SUDDEN-DEATH SYNDROME OF SOYBEAN
    RUPE, JC
    GBUR, EE
    MARX, DM
    PLANT DISEASE, 1991, 75 (01) : 47 - 50
  • [2] Soybean cultivar identification using RAPD
    Zhang, JH
    McDonald, MB
    Sweeney, PM
    SEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 24 (03) : 589 - 592
  • [3] Physiological and Phenological Responses of Historical Soybean Cultivar Releases to Earlier Planting
    Rowntree, Scott C.
    Suhre, Justin J.
    Weidenbenner, Nicholas H.
    Wilson, Eric W.
    Davis, Vince M.
    Naeve, Seth L.
    Casteel, Shaun N.
    Diers, Brian W.
    Esker, Paul D.
    Conley, Shawn P.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2014, 54 (02) : 804 - 816
  • [4] New and Old Soybean Cultivar Responses to Plant Density and Intercepted Light
    De Bruin, Jason L.
    Pedersen, Palle
    CROP SCIENCE, 2009, 49 (06) : 2225 - 2232
  • [5] Soybean cultivar responses to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in field and controlled environment studies
    Wegulo, SN
    Yang, XB
    Martinson, CA
    PLANT DISEASE, 1998, 82 (11) : 1264 - 1270
  • [6] Simulating classifier outputs for evaluating parallel combination methods
    Zouari, H
    Heutte, L
    Lecourtier, Y
    Alimi, A
    MULTIPLE CLASSIFIER SYSTEMS, PROCEEDING, 2003, 2709 : 296 - 305
  • [7] Fast generalized cross validation using Krylov subspace methods
    Sidje, Roger B.
    Williams, Alan B.
    Burrage, Kevin
    NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, 2008, 47 (02) : 109 - 131
  • [8] Fast generalized cross validation using Krylov subspace methods
    Roger B. Sidje
    Alan B. Williams
    Kevin Burrage
    Numerical Algorithms, 2008, 47 : 109 - 131
  • [9] Assessing molecular interactions with biophysical methods using the validation cross
    Gossert, Alvar D.
    BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2019, 47 : 63 - 76
  • [10] Validation and Cross-Validation Methods for ASCAT
    Anderson, Craig
    Figa-Saldana, Julia
    Wilson, John Julian William
    Ticconi, Francesca
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 10 (05) : 2232 - 2239