Regulations and practices of structured doctoral education in the life sciences in Germany

被引:11
|
作者
Lachmann, Daniel [1 ]
Martius, Thilo [1 ]
Eberle, Julia [2 ]
Landmann, Mareike [3 ]
von Kotzebue, Lena [4 ]
Neuhaus, Birgit [5 ]
Herzig, Stefan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Studies & Teaching, Cologne, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Educ Psychol, Bochum, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Salzburg, Didakt Bio & Geowissensch, Sch Educ, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Biol Educ, Munich, Germany
[6] TH Koln Univ Appl Sci Cologne, Cologne, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 07期
关键词
PHD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0233415
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Structured doctoral education is increasingly preferred compared to the individual model. Several science policy organisations give recommendations on how to structure doctoral education. However, there is little research on to what extent these recommendations find their way into practice. In our study, we first compared European and German recommendations on doctoral education with, second, the institutional regulations of structured doctoral programmes (N= 98) in the life sciences at twelve different German universities. Additionally, we third asked doctoral graduates (N= 1796) of these structured doctoral programmes and graduates of individual doctoral studies about their experience in doctoral education. Fourth, we contrasted the regulations of structured doctoral programmes with the reported experiences of their graduates. We found significant deviations of the reported practices of graduates from the regulations of their organisations, regarding the student admission, supervision and curricular activities of doctoral candidates. The efficacy of structured versus traditional doctoral education should be examined based on reported practice rather than on the respective written regulations.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reflections about publications during doctoral education in health care sciences
    Danielson, Ella
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2011, 25 (02) : 209 - 210
  • [32] Social origin and structured doctoral education: Which influence do they exert on performance during the doctoral phase?
    Lachmann, Daniel
    Martius, Thilo
    Landmann, Mareike
    Herzig, Stefan
    [J]. SOZIALE WELT-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 2018, 69 (03): : 319 - 348
  • [33] Disrupting the doctoral journey: re-imagining doctoral pedagogies and temporal practices in higher education
    Gravett, Karen
    [J]. TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 26 (03) : 293 - 305
  • [34] Advising practices in doctoral education from the perspective of disciplinary culture
    Zha, Qiang
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF EDUCATION IN CHINA, 2019, 14 (03) : 509 - 512
  • [35] INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL SECTION Practices and Policies for Doctoral Education and Leadership
    Franklin, Cynthia
    Lightfoot, Elizabeth
    Zimmerman, Sheryl
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION, 2018, 54 (04) : 724 - 726
  • [36] A Comparative Study of Selection, Training and Advisory Practices for Doctoral Education
    Tonbul, Yilmaz
    [J]. EURASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, (55): : 263 - 282
  • [37] Insights on poster preparation practices in life sciences
    Jambor, Helena Klara
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 3
  • [38] Review of doctoral research in language education in Germany (2014-2018)
    Heine, Lena
    Marx, Nicole
    Schaedlich, Birgit
    Wilden, Eva
    [J]. LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2020, 53 (03) : 341 - 357
  • [39] Review of doctoral research in language education in Germany (2009-2013)
    Doff, Sabine
    Koenigs, Frank G.
    Marx, Nicole
    Schaedlich, Birgit
    [J]. LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2016, 49 (02) : 213 - 234
  • [40] Life sciences, globalisation and engineering education
    Hopp, V
    [J]. 2ND GLOBAL CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING EDUCATION, CONGRESS PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 264 - 266