Regulations and practices of structured doctoral education in the life sciences in Germany

被引:11
|
作者
Lachmann, Daniel [1 ]
Martius, Thilo [1 ]
Eberle, Julia [2 ]
Landmann, Mareike [3 ]
von Kotzebue, Lena [4 ]
Neuhaus, Birgit [5 ]
Herzig, Stefan [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Studies & Teaching, Cologne, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Educ Psychol, Bochum, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Cologne, Germany
[4] Univ Salzburg, Didakt Bio & Geowissensch, Sch Educ, Salzburg, Austria
[5] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Biol Educ, Munich, Germany
[6] TH Koln Univ Appl Sci Cologne, Cologne, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 07期
关键词
PHD;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0233415
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Structured doctoral education is increasingly preferred compared to the individual model. Several science policy organisations give recommendations on how to structure doctoral education. However, there is little research on to what extent these recommendations find their way into practice. In our study, we first compared European and German recommendations on doctoral education with, second, the institutional regulations of structured doctoral programmes (N= 98) in the life sciences at twelve different German universities. Additionally, we third asked doctoral graduates (N= 1796) of these structured doctoral programmes and graduates of individual doctoral studies about their experience in doctoral education. Fourth, we contrasted the regulations of structured doctoral programmes with the reported experiences of their graduates. We found significant deviations of the reported practices of graduates from the regulations of their organisations, regarding the student admission, supervision and curricular activities of doctoral candidates. The efficacy of structured versus traditional doctoral education should be examined based on reported practice rather than on the respective written regulations.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Identifying, Characterising and Assessing New Practices in Doctoral Education
    Baschung, Lukas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2016, 51 (04) : 522 - 534
  • [22] Joint supervision practices in doctoral education - A student experience
    Lahenius, Katja
    Ikavalko, Heini
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 38 (03) : 427 - 446
  • [23] Doctoral student funding portfolios across and within engineering, life sciences and physical sciences
    Knight, David
    Kinoshita, Timothy
    Choe, Nathan
    Borrego, Maura
    [J]. STUDIES IN GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL EDUCATION, 2018, 9 (01) : 75 - 90
  • [24] Simulation in Nursing Education: Current Regulations and Practices
    Hayden, Jennifer K.
    Smiley, Richard A.
    Gross, Lindsey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION, 2014, 5 (02) : 25 - 30
  • [25] THE RELEVANCE OF SPECIESISM TO LIFE SCIENCES PRACTICES
    Wertheimer, Roger
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 32 : 27 - 38
  • [26] Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine
    Emmerich, Nathan
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2017, 39 (01) : 161 - 162
  • [27] A systematic mapping of public health master's and structured doctoral programs in Germany
    Saturska, Hanna
    Kufer, Katrina
    Pedron, Sara
    Meyer, Gesa
    Emmert-Fees, Karl
    Laxy, Michael
    Stephan, Anna-Janina
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [28] The Sciences of Education and Quality of Life
    McGettrick, Bart
    [J]. SCIENCES OF EDUCATION SERVING THE QUALITY OF HUMAN LIFE, 2010, : 21 - 23
  • [29] International developments in doctoral education. Case study: Germany
    Kehm, Barbara M.
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 60 (05) : 668 - 676
  • [30] Post graduate doctoral program of study Lifelong Education and Educational Sciences
    Badric, Marko
    [J]. CROATIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION-HRVATSKI CASOPIS ZA ODGOJ I OBRAZOVANJE, 2017, 19 (03): : 1001 - 1003