Influence diagrams as decision-making tools for pesticide risk management

被引:23
|
作者
Carriger, John F.
Newman, Michael C.
机构
关键词
BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; MODEL; JUDGMENT; PROBABILITY; SCIENCE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.268
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The pesticide policy arena is filled with discussion of probabilistic approaches to assess ecological risk, however, similar discussions about implementing formal probabilistic methods in pesticide risk decision making are less common. An influence diagram approach is proposed for ecological risk-based decisions about pesticide usage. Aside from technical data, pesticide risk management relies on diverse sources, such as stakeholder opinions, to make decisions about what, how, where, and when to spray. Bayesian influence diagrams allow multiple lines of evidence, including process related information from existing data and expert judgment, in 1 inclusive decision model. In ecological risk assessments, data informally incorporated for pesticide usage decisions, such as field and laboratory effect studies along with chemical monitoring and modeling data, can be formally incorporated and expressed in linked causal diagrams. A case study is presented from the perspective of an environmental manager wishing to efficiently control pests while minimizing risk to local aquatic receptors. Exposure modeling results and toxicity studies were incorporated, and an ecological risk assessment was carried out but combined with hypothetical information on spraying efficacy and valuation of outcomes that would be necessary for making risk management decisions. The variables and their links in the influence diagram are ones that are important to a manager and can be manipulated to optimally control pests while protecting nontarget resources. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2012; 8: 339-350. (C) 2011 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 350
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental risk management decision-making in a societal context
    Power, M
    McCarty, LS
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2006, 12 (01): : 18 - 27
  • [32] Investment decision-making in supplier networks: Management of risk
    Ojala, Mika
    Hallikas, Jukka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2006, 104 (01) : 201 - 213
  • [33] Warning Decision-Making for Landslide Dam Breaching Flood Using Influence Diagrams
    Zhu, Yan
    Peng, Ming
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhang, Limin
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [34] RISK MANAGEMENT AND CONSUMER PARTICIPATION IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING
    VERTINSKY, I
    UYENO, DH
    HSMHA HEALTH REPORTS, 1971, 86 (12): : 1122 - +
  • [35] RISK MANAGEMENT IN REPAIR WORK DECISION-MAKING - COMMENT
    ROBERTS, BC
    BARNES, WC
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1989, 101 (04) : 148 - 150
  • [36] Risk Decision-making System in Manufacture Enterprise Management
    Chen Yilin
    MANUFACTURING PROCESS AND EQUIPMENT, PTS 1-4, 2013, 694-697 : 3592 - 3595
  • [37] Management Decision-Making: Risk Reduction Through Simulation
    James S Baldwin
    Chris Rose-Anderssen
    Keith Ridgway
    Peter M Allen
    Alvaro Lopez
    Mark Strathern
    Liz Varga
    Risk Management, 2006, 8 (4) : 310 - 328
  • [38] Intelligent reasoning and management decision making with grey rough influence diagrams
    Hu, Haiqing
    Liu, Bingqiang
    Shen, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND CYBERNETICS, 2016, 9 (04) : 336 - 353
  • [39] DECISION-ANALYSIS AND RISK MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING - ISSUES AND METHODS
    COVELLO, VT
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1987, 7 (02) : 131 - 139
  • [40] Tools for Supporting Responsible Decision-Making?
    Vriens, Dirk
    Achterbergh, Jan
    SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2015, 32 (03) : 312 - 329