Influence diagrams as decision-making tools for pesticide risk management

被引:23
|
作者
Carriger, John F.
Newman, Michael C.
机构
关键词
BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; MODEL; JUDGMENT; PROBABILITY; SCIENCE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.268
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The pesticide policy arena is filled with discussion of probabilistic approaches to assess ecological risk, however, similar discussions about implementing formal probabilistic methods in pesticide risk decision making are less common. An influence diagram approach is proposed for ecological risk-based decisions about pesticide usage. Aside from technical data, pesticide risk management relies on diverse sources, such as stakeholder opinions, to make decisions about what, how, where, and when to spray. Bayesian influence diagrams allow multiple lines of evidence, including process related information from existing data and expert judgment, in 1 inclusive decision model. In ecological risk assessments, data informally incorporated for pesticide usage decisions, such as field and laboratory effect studies along with chemical monitoring and modeling data, can be formally incorporated and expressed in linked causal diagrams. A case study is presented from the perspective of an environmental manager wishing to efficiently control pests while minimizing risk to local aquatic receptors. Exposure modeling results and toxicity studies were incorporated, and an ecological risk assessment was carried out but combined with hypothetical information on spraying efficacy and valuation of outcomes that would be necessary for making risk management decisions. The variables and their links in the influence diagram are ones that are important to a manager and can be manipulated to optimally control pests while protecting nontarget resources. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2012; 8: 339-350. (C) 2011 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 350
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Integrated modelling tools to support risk-based decision-making in marine spatial management
    Stelzenmueller, V.
    Schulze, T.
    Fock, H. O.
    Berkenhagen, J.
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2011, 441 : 197 - 212
  • [22] Safety management and decision-making system based on risk management
    Changjian, Wang
    Progress in Mining Science and Safety Technology, Pts A and B, 2007, : 2280 - 2283
  • [23] THE INFLUENCE OF THE WEATHER ON FARM-MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING
    STEFFEN, G
    BERICHTE UBER LANDWIRTSCHAFT, 1984, 62 (01): : 58 - 85
  • [24] RISK DECISION-MAKING
    CARR, CJ
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 5 (02) : 121 - 122
  • [25] INFLUENCE OF AGISM ON DECISION-MAKING - THE PERCEPTION OF UPPER MANAGEMENT
    TREMBLAY, D
    CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 1995, 14 (03): : 464 - 479
  • [26] The Influence of Emotion Regulation on Decision-making under Risk
    Martin, Laura N.
    Delgado, Mauricio R.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 23 (09) : 2569 - 2581
  • [27] Networks of influence diagrams: A formalism for representing agents' beliefs and decision-making processes
    Gal, Ya'akov
    Pfeffer, Avi
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2008, 33 : 109 - 147
  • [28] RISK MANAGEMENT IN REPAIR WORK DECISION-MAKING - REPLY
    SMITH, BD
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 1989, 101 (04) : 151 - 152
  • [29] Approach to Risk Management Decision-Making in the Small Business
    Myskova, Renata
    Doupalova, Veronika
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (BEM2015), 2015, 34 : 329 - 336
  • [30] OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT - A NEW PARADIGM FOR DECISION-MAKING
    BEROGGI, GEG
    WALLACE, WA
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1994, 24 (10): : 1450 - 1457