Influence diagrams as decision-making tools for pesticide risk management

被引:23
|
作者
Carriger, John F.
Newman, Michael C.
机构
关键词
BAYESIAN BELIEF NETWORKS; MODEL; JUDGMENT; PROBABILITY; SCIENCE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1002/ieam.268
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The pesticide policy arena is filled with discussion of probabilistic approaches to assess ecological risk, however, similar discussions about implementing formal probabilistic methods in pesticide risk decision making are less common. An influence diagram approach is proposed for ecological risk-based decisions about pesticide usage. Aside from technical data, pesticide risk management relies on diverse sources, such as stakeholder opinions, to make decisions about what, how, where, and when to spray. Bayesian influence diagrams allow multiple lines of evidence, including process related information from existing data and expert judgment, in 1 inclusive decision model. In ecological risk assessments, data informally incorporated for pesticide usage decisions, such as field and laboratory effect studies along with chemical monitoring and modeling data, can be formally incorporated and expressed in linked causal diagrams. A case study is presented from the perspective of an environmental manager wishing to efficiently control pests while minimizing risk to local aquatic receptors. Exposure modeling results and toxicity studies were incorporated, and an ecological risk assessment was carried out but combined with hypothetical information on spraying efficacy and valuation of outcomes that would be necessary for making risk management decisions. The variables and their links in the influence diagram are ones that are important to a manager and can be manipulated to optimally control pests while protecting nontarget resources. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2012; 8: 339-350. (C) 2011 SETAC
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 350
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Supporting Decision-Making with the Tools of Risk Management
    Fekete, Istvan
    PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY-HUNGARY, 2022, 67 (01): : 28 - 47
  • [2] Quantum-like influence diagrams for decision-making
    Moreira, Catarina
    Tiwari, Prayag
    Pandey, Hari Mohan
    Bruza, Peter
    Wichert, Andreas
    NEURAL NETWORKS, 2020, 132 (132) : 190 - 210
  • [3] Decision-Making Oriented Aggregation of Nodes in Influence Diagrams
    Gong, Cai-Yun
    Liu, Wei-Yi
    Yue, Kun
    Li, Wei-Hua
    2010 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2010, : 2150 - 2155
  • [4] Influence of decision-making style and risk preference on decision-making in badminton
    Chi, Lizhong
    Zhou, Xiangwen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 111 - 111
  • [5] Influence of Portfolio Management in Decision-Making
    Baptestone, Rolney
    Rabechini, Roque, Jr.
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-JIEM, 2018, 11 (03): : 406 - 428
  • [6] Diagnostic reasoning and medical decision-making with fuzzy influence diagrams
    Kao, Han-Ying
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2008, 90 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [7] Post-earthquake decision-making using influence diagrams
    Bensi, Michelle T.
    Kiureghian, Armen Der
    Straub, Daniel
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, : 343 - 351
  • [8] Decision-Making Tools and Their Influence on Caseworkers' Room for Discretion
    Hoybye-Mortensen, Matilde
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2015, 45 (02): : 600 - 615
  • [9] Risk management in the decision-making of Romanian entities
    Boghean, Florin
    EMERGING MARKETS QUERIES IN FINANCE AND BUSINESS 2014, EMQFB 2014, 2015, 32 : 1066 - 1074
  • [10] A Model to Support Risk Management Decision-Making
    Tchangani, Ayeley P.
    STUDIES IN INFORMATICS AND CONTROL, 2011, 20 (03): : 209 - 220