In vivo evaluation of resorbable bone graft substitutes in beagles: Histological properties

被引:15
|
作者
Shih, Tsai-Chin [1 ]
Teng, Nai-Chia [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Peter-D. [1 ]
Lin, Che-Tong [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Jen-Chang [3 ]
Fong, Sheng-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Hsi-Kuei [1 ,4 ]
Chang, Wei-Jen [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Oral Med, Sch Dent, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dent Dept Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Oral Med, Sch Dent Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Shuang Ho Hosp, Dent Dept Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
calcium phosphate cement (CPC); calcium sulfate dehydrate; histological analysis; beagle; histomorphometric study; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE CEMENTS; CAHPO4-ALPHA-CA-3(PO4)(2) SYSTEM; DISSOLUTION RATES; ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA; SULFATE; HYDROXYAPATITE; DEFECTS; CARBONATE; CERAMICS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.a.34540
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is a promising material for use in minimally invasive surgery for bone defect repairs due to its bone-like apatitic final setting product, biocompatibility, bioactivity, self-setting characteristics, low setting temperature, adequate stiffness, and easy shaping into complicated geometrics. However, even though CPC is stable in vivo, the resorption rate of this bone cement is very slow and its long setting time poses difficulties for clinical use. Calcium sulfate dehydrate (CSD) has been used as a filler material and/or as a replacement for cancellous bone grafts due to its biocompatibility. However, it is resorbed too quickly to be optimal for bone regeneration. This study examines the invivo response of a hydroxyapatite (HA), [apatitic phase (AP)]/calcium sulfate (CSD) composite using different ratios in the mandibular premolar sockets of beagles. The HA (AP)/CSD composite materials were prepared in the ratios of 30/70, 50/50, and 70/30 and then implanted into the mandibular premolar sockets for terms of 5 and 10 weeks. The control socket was left empty. The study shows better new bone morphology and more new bone area in the histological and the histomorphometric study of the HA (AP)/CSD in the 50/50 ratio. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:2405 / 2411
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vivo evaluation of resorbable bone graft substitutes in mandibular sockets of the beagle
    Shih, Tsai-Chin
    Chang, Wei-Jen
    Yang, Jen-Chang
    Feng, Sheng-Wei
    Lin, Che-Tong
    Teng, Nai-Chia
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2012, 100A (10) : 2726 - 2731
  • [2] In vivo evaluation of resorbable bone graft substitutes in a rabbit tibial defect model
    Stubbs, D
    Deakin, M
    Chapman-Sheath, P
    Bruce, W
    Debes, J
    Gillies, RM
    Walsh, WR
    BIOMATERIALS, 2004, 25 (20) : 5037 - 5044
  • [3] Resorbable biomaterials as bone graft substitutes
    Bohner, Marc
    MATERIALS TODAY, 2010, 13 (1-2) : 24 - 30
  • [4] In vivo investigations on composites made of resorbable ceramics and poly(lactide) used as bone graft substitutes
    Ignatius, AA
    Betz, O
    Augat, P
    Claes, LE
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2001, 58 (06): : 701 - 709
  • [5] In Vitro And In Vivo Evaluation Of Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Substitutes
    Song, Ho Yeon
    Kim, Young-Hee
    Anirban, Jyoti M.
    Byun, In-Seon
    Kwak, Kyung-A
    Lee, Byong-Taek
    PRICM 7, PTS 1-3, 2010, 654-656 : 2065 - +
  • [6] Evaluation of bone graft substitutes
    Gouin, F
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 1998, 84 : 60 - 63
  • [7] Supercritical carbon dioxide processed resorbable polymer nanocomposite bone graft substitutes
    Baker, Kevin C.
    Manitiu, Mihai
    Bellair, Robert
    Gratopp, Carly A.
    Herkowitz, Harry N.
    Kannan, Rangaramanujam M.
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2011, 7 (09) : 3382 - 3389
  • [8] Guided bone regeneration using resorbable membrane and different bone substitutes: Early histological and molecular events
    Elgali, Ibrahim
    Turri, Alberto
    Xia, Wei
    Norlindh, Birgitta
    Johansson, Anna
    Dahlin, Christer
    Thomsen, Peter
    Omar, Omar
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2016, 29 : 409 - 423
  • [9] Is there a need for resorbable implants or bone substitutes?
    Rikli, DA
    Regazzoni, P
    Perren, SM
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2002, 33 : 2 - 3
  • [10] Evaluation of substitutes for bone: Comparison of microradiographic and histological assessments
    Thorwarth, M.
    Wehrhan, F.
    Srour, S.
    Schultze-Mosgau, S.
    Felszeghy, E.
    Bader, R. D.
    Schlegel, K. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 45 (01): : 41 - 47