In vivo evaluation of resorbable bone graft substitutes in beagles: Histological properties

被引:15
|
作者
Shih, Tsai-Chin [1 ]
Teng, Nai-Chia [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Peter-D. [1 ]
Lin, Che-Tong [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Jen-Chang [3 ]
Fong, Sheng-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Hsi-Kuei [1 ,4 ]
Chang, Wei-Jen [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Oral Med, Sch Dent, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dent Dept Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Oral Med, Sch Dent Technol, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Shuang Ho Hosp, Dent Dept Hosp, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
calcium phosphate cement (CPC); calcium sulfate dehydrate; histological analysis; beagle; histomorphometric study; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE CEMENTS; CAHPO4-ALPHA-CA-3(PO4)(2) SYSTEM; DISSOLUTION RATES; ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA; SULFATE; HYDROXYAPATITE; DEFECTS; CARBONATE; CERAMICS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.a.34540
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) is a promising material for use in minimally invasive surgery for bone defect repairs due to its bone-like apatitic final setting product, biocompatibility, bioactivity, self-setting characteristics, low setting temperature, adequate stiffness, and easy shaping into complicated geometrics. However, even though CPC is stable in vivo, the resorption rate of this bone cement is very slow and its long setting time poses difficulties for clinical use. Calcium sulfate dehydrate (CSD) has been used as a filler material and/or as a replacement for cancellous bone grafts due to its biocompatibility. However, it is resorbed too quickly to be optimal for bone regeneration. This study examines the invivo response of a hydroxyapatite (HA), [apatitic phase (AP)]/calcium sulfate (CSD) composite using different ratios in the mandibular premolar sockets of beagles. The HA (AP)/CSD composite materials were prepared in the ratios of 30/70, 50/50, and 70/30 and then implanted into the mandibular premolar sockets for terms of 5 and 10 weeks. The control socket was left empty. The study shows better new bone morphology and more new bone area in the histological and the histomorphometric study of the HA (AP)/CSD in the 50/50 ratio. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:2405 / 2411
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative in vivo study of six hydroxyapatite-based bone graft substitutes
    Habibovic, Pamela
    Kruyt, Moyo C.
    Juhl, Maria V.
    Clyens, Stuart
    Martinetti, Roberta
    Dolcini, Laura
    Theilgaard, Naseem
    van Blitterswijk, Clemens A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2008, 26 (10) : 1363 - 1370
  • [32] In vitro biocompatibility of resorbable experimental glass ceramics for bone substitutes
    Ignatius, AA
    Schmidt, C
    Kaspar, D
    Claes, LE
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2001, 55 (03): : 285 - 294
  • [33] Bone graft substitutes and segmental bone defects
    Diefenbeck, Michael
    UNFALLCHIRURGIE, 2022, 125 (11): : 921 - 922
  • [34] Bone grafting and bone graft substitutes - Preface
    Boden, SD
    Stevenson, S
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 30 (04) : XI - XI
  • [35] Evaluation of moldable, in situ hardening calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes
    Schmidlin, P. R.
    Nicholls, F.
    Kruse, A.
    Zwahlen, R. A.
    Weber, F. E.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2013, 24 (02) : 149 - 157
  • [36] Osteoinduction in a resorbable bone graft extender.
    Hile, DD
    Lewandrowski, KU
    Doherty, SA
    Wise, DL
    Trantolo, DJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2002, 224 : U505 - U505
  • [37] BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BONE-GRAFT SUBSTITUTES
    KENLEY, RA
    YIM, K
    ABRAMS, J
    RON, E
    TUREK, T
    MARDEN, LJ
    HOLLINGER, JO
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 10 (10) : 1393 - 1401
  • [38] Nonallograft osteoconductive bone graft substitutes
    Bucholz, RW
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2002, (395) : 44 - 52
  • [39] Regulations applicable to bone graft substitutes
    Chauveaux, D
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 1998, 84 : 57 - 60
  • [40] Bone graft substitutes in modern orthopedics
    Parikh, SN
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2002, 25 (11) : 1301 - 1309