A Comparison of Two Methods in Acquiring Stimulus-Response Curves with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

被引:33
|
作者
Pearce, Alan J. [1 ]
Clark, Ross A. [2 ]
Kidgell, Dawson J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Cognit & Exercise Neurosci Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Physiotherapy, Ctr Hlth Exercise & Sports Med, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Ctr Phys Act & Nutr Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Stimulus-response curve; Hand; Arm; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; SILENT PERIOD; CORTICOMOTOR EXCITABILITY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; RELIABILITY; PROJECTION; MUSCLES; BRAIN; TASK; HAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2012.05.010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The stimulus-response (S-R) curve is a well accepted constituent in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies. However, it has been suggested that parameters of the S-R curve differ when stimuli are provided in a "ramped" (measured steps from low to high intensity), or "random" fashion. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the parameters of the S R curve between either methodologies. Methods: Using a randomised cross-over design, 10 healthy participants (29.6 +/- 6.4 yrs, 3 f) completed "ramped" or "random" curves in biceps brachii (BB) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles of both limbs. Curves were compared using mixed-factor ANOVA and correlated between limbs and methodologies. Results: No differences (P > 0.05) and high correlations (range 0.71-0.97; P < 0.001) were observed in BB and FDI data between curves. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that either methodology provides similar parameters of the S - R curve in healthy participants. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 309
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条