A Comparison of Two Methods in Acquiring Stimulus-Response Curves with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

被引:33
|
作者
Pearce, Alan J. [1 ]
Clark, Ross A. [2 ]
Kidgell, Dawson J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Psychol, Cognit & Exercise Neurosci Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Physiotherapy, Ctr Hlth Exercise & Sports Med, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Ctr Phys Act & Nutr Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Stimulus-response curve; Hand; Arm; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; SILENT PERIOD; CORTICOMOTOR EXCITABILITY; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; RELIABILITY; PROJECTION; MUSCLES; BRAIN; TASK; HAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2012.05.010
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The stimulus-response (S-R) curve is a well accepted constituent in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies. However, it has been suggested that parameters of the S-R curve differ when stimuli are provided in a "ramped" (measured steps from low to high intensity), or "random" fashion. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that there would be no difference in the parameters of the S R curve between either methodologies. Methods: Using a randomised cross-over design, 10 healthy participants (29.6 +/- 6.4 yrs, 3 f) completed "ramped" or "random" curves in biceps brachii (BB) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles of both limbs. Curves were compared using mixed-factor ANOVA and correlated between limbs and methodologies. Results: No differences (P > 0.05) and high correlations (range 0.71-0.97; P < 0.001) were observed in BB and FDI data between curves. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that either methodology provides similar parameters of the S - R curve in healthy participants. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 309
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Rapid Acquisition of the Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Stimulus Response Curve
    Mathias, Jonathan P.
    Barsi, Gergely I.
    van de Ruit, Mark
    Grey, Michael J.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2014, 7 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [12] Considerations for Stimulus-Response Curves in Stroke: An Investigation Comparing Collection and Analysis Methods
    Massie, Crystal L.
    Malcolm, Matthew P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 123 (03) : 175 - 183
  • [13] Determination of individual stimulus-response curves in the visual cortex
    Hagenbeek, RE
    Rombouts, SARB
    van Dijk, BW
    Barkhof, F
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2002, 17 (04) : 244 - 250
  • [14] Classification of stimuli based on stimulus-response curves and their variability
    Lansky, Petr
    Pokora, Ondrej
    Rospars, Jean-Pierre
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 1225 : 57 - 66
  • [15] STIMULUS-RESPONSE CURVES FOR HYPOXIC PULMONARY VASOCONSTRICTION IN PIGLETS
    DECANNIERE, D
    STEFANIDIS, C
    HALLEMANS, R
    DELCROIX, M
    BRIMIOULLE, S
    NAEIJE, R
    CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 1992, 26 (10) : 944 - 949
  • [16] COMPARISON OF THE STIMULUS-RESPONSE CURVES OF AORTIC AND CAROTID-SINUS BARORECEPTORS IN DECEREBRATED CATS
    SAMODELOV, LF
    GODEHARD, E
    ARNDT, JO
    PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 383 (01): : 47 - 53
  • [17] Characterization of stimulus response curves obtained with transcranial magnetic stimulation from bilateral tibialis anterior muscles post stroke
    Iyer, Pooja C.
    Madhavan, Sangeetha
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2019, 713
  • [18] Resting and active motor thresholds versus stimulus–response curves to determine transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity in quadriceps femoris
    John Temesi
    Mathieu Gruet
    Thomas Rupp
    Samuel Verges
    Guillaume Y Millet
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 11
  • [19] Characterization of stimulus response curves obtained with transcranial magnetic stimulation from bilateral anterior digastric muscles in healthy subjects
    Herbert, Paul
    Burke, Jeanmarie R.
    SOMATOSENSORY AND MOTOR RESEARCH, 2021, 38 (03): : 178 - 187
  • [20] Frequency-Following Response with Speech Stimulus: Comparison between Two Methods of Stimulation
    Sanguebuche, Taissane Rodrigues
    Lima da Silva, Luize Caroline
    Peixe, Bruna Pias
    da Silva, Debora Durigon
    Garcia, Michele Vargas
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 23 (04) : E396 - E402