Postoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Association to Audiometric Thresholds and Auditory Performance

被引:14
|
作者
Attias, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Ulanovski, David [3 ,4 ]
Hilly, Ohad [3 ,4 ]
Greenstein, Tally [2 ]
Sokolov, Merav [3 ,4 ]
HabibAllah, Suhail [1 ]
Mormer, Hen [1 ]
Raveh, Eyal [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave, IL-3498838 Haifa, Israel
[2] Schneider Childrens Med Ctr Israel, Inst Audiol & Clin Neurophysiol, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[3] Schneider Childrens Med Ctr Israel, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2020年 / 41卷 / 05期
关键词
Auditory neuropathy; Children; Cochlear microphonics responses; Congenital; Electrocochleography; Residual hearing; ROUND WINDOW ELECTROCOCHLEOGRAPHY; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; HEARING-PRESERVATION; RESIDUAL HEARING; CHILDREN; NERVE; NEUROPATHY; SPEECH; PERCEPTION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000833
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare intracochlear-recorded cochlear microphonics (CM) responses to behavioral audiometry thresholds in young children, with congenital hearing loss, 2 to 5 years after cochlear implantation early in life. In addition, differences in speech and auditory outcomes were assessed among children with and without residual hearing. Design: The study was conducted at a tertiary, university-affiliated, pediatric medical center. CM responses by intracochlear electrocochleography technique were recorded from 102 implanted ears of 60 children and those responses correlated to behavioral audiometry thresholds at 0.125 to 2 kHz frequencies. All children had received Advanced Bionics cochlear implant with High Focus J1 or MidScala electrodes, along with extensive auditory rehabilitation before and after implantation, including the use of conventional hearing aids. Speech Spatial and Hearing Qualities, Category of Auditory Performance scale, and educational settings information were obtained for each participant. Those cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes were compared between children with or without residual CM responses. Results: Two distinctive CM responses patterns were found among the implanted children. Of all ears diagnosed with cochlear hearing loss (n = 88), only in 29 ears, clear CM responses were obtained. In all other ears, no CM responses were obtained at the maximum output levels. The CM responses were highly correlated with coefficients ranging from 0.7 to 0.83 for the audiometric behavioral thresholds at 0.125 to 2 kHz frequency range. Of all ears diagnosed with auditory neuropathy syndrome disorder (n = 14), eight ears had residual hearing and recordable CM postimplantation. The other six ears showed no recordable CM responses at maximum output levels for all tested frequencies. Those showed supposedly better CM responses than the behavioral audiometry threshold, however with poor correlations with tested frequency thresholds. Children with residual hearing showed significantly better auditory outcomes with CI, compared with those without residual hearing. Conclusions: In children with congenital cochlear hearing loss, the objective CM intracochlear responses can reliably predict the residual audiometric threshold. However, in children with auditory neuropathy syndrome disorder, the CM thresholds did not match the behavioral audiometric responses. Postoperatively, children with recordable CM responses, showing preserved residual hearing, demonstrated better CI outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1135 / 1143
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting Postoperative Speech Perception and Audiometric Thresholds Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Panario, Jared
    Bester, Christofer
    O'Leary, Stephen
    EAR AND HEARING, 2024, 45 (05): : 1173 - 1190
  • [2] Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Residual Hearing: Comparison With Audiometric Thresholds
    Koka, Kanthaiah
    Saoji, Aniket A.
    Litvak, Leonid M.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (03): : E161 - E167
  • [3] Intracochlear electrocochleography findings in cochlear implant recipients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder
    Ulukan, Merve Bayri
    Ciprut, Ayca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 170
  • [4] Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Dalbert, Adrian
    Pfiffner, Flurin
    Roeoesli, Christof
    Thoele, Konrad
    Sim, Jae Hoon
    Gerig, Rahel
    Huber, Alexander M.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2015, 20 (05) : 339 - 348
  • [5] Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Valenzuela, Carla V.
    Lichtenhan, Jeffery T.
    Lefler, Shannon M.
    Koka, Kanthaiah
    Buchman, Craig A.
    Ortmann, Amanda J.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (10): : E2681 - E2688
  • [6] Does Intraoperative Extracochlear Electrocochleography Correlate With Postoperative Audiometric Hearing Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Surgery? A Retrospective Analysis of Cochlear Monitoring
    Haumann, Sabine
    Mynarek , Marlene
    Maier, Hannes
    Helmstaedter, Victor
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Teschner, Magnus J.
    TRENDS IN HEARING, 2024, 28
  • [7] Auditory Cognitive Training for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients
    Mishra, Srikanta K.
    Boddupally, Shiva P.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2018, 39 (01): : 48 - 59
  • [8] Amplitude growth of intracochlear electrocochleography in cochlear implant users with residual hearing
    Krueger, Benjamin
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Nogueira, Waldo
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 147 (02): : 1147 - 1162
  • [9] POSTOPERATIVE AUDIOMETRIC EVALUATION OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT PATIENTS
    RIZER, FM
    ARKIS, PN
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1986, : 33 - 33
  • [10] A POSTOPERATIVE AUDIOMETRIC EVALUATION OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT PATIENTS
    RIZER, FM
    ARKIS, PN
    LIPPY, WH
    SCHURING, AG
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1988, 98 (03) : 203 - 206