Investigating beam matching for multi-room pencil beam scanning proton therapy

被引:8
|
作者
Rana, Suresh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bennouna, Jaafar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Baptist Hlth South Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami Canc Inst, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL 33176 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Herbert Werthe Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] VIT Univ, Sch Adv Sci, Dept Phys, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Beam-matching; Spot size; Range; Absolute dose; Pencil beam scanning; Proton therapy;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-020-00927-7
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the proton beam matching for a multi-room ProteusPLUS pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy system and quantify the agreement among three beam-matched treatment rooms (GTR1, GTR2, and GTR3). In-air spot size measurements were acquired using a 2D scintillation detector at various gantry angles. Range and absolute dose measurements were performed in water at gantry angle 0 degrees. Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) plans of four different disease sites (brain, mediastinum, sacrum, and prostate) and machine QA fields with uniform dose were delivered for various beam conditions. The results from GTR1 were considered as reference values. The average difference in spot sizes between GTR2 and GTR1 was - 0.3% +/- 2.2% (range, - 5.9 to 5.8%). For GTR3 vs. GTR1, the average difference in spot sizes was 0.6% +/- 1.7% (range, - 4.8 to 4.6%). The spot symmetry was found to be <= 4.4%. For proton range, the difference among three rooms was within +/- 0.5 mm. On average, the difference in absolute dose was - 0.1 +/- 0.7% (range, - 1.3 to 2.1%) for GTR2 vs. GTR1 and 0.7 +/- 0.6% (range, - 0.1 to 2.1%) for GTR3 vs. GTR1. The average gamma passing rate of patient-specific QA measurements (n = 29) was >= 98.6%. The average gamma passing rate of machine QA fields was 99.9%. In conclusion, proton beam matching was quantified for three beam-matched rooms of an IBA ProteusPLUS system with a PBS dedicated nozzle. It is feasible to match the spot size and absolute dose within +/- 5% and +/- 2%, respectively. Proton range can be matched within +/- 0.5 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1251
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigating Aperture-Based Approximations to Model a Dynamic Collimation System for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Nelson, N.
    Smith, B.
    Culberson, W.
    Flynn, R.
    Hyer, D.
    Rana, S.
    Hill, P.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E802 - E802
  • [42] Comparison of multi-institutional Varian ProBeam pencil beam scanning proton beam commissioning data
    Langner, Ulrich W.
    Eley, John G.
    Dong, Lei
    Langen, Katja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 18 (03): : 96 - 107
  • [43] Toxicity Outcomes of Hypofractionated Image Guided Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for Spinal Chordomas
    Chilukuri, S.
    Burela, N.
    Nangia, S.
    Adhityan, R.
    Gaikwad, U. S.
    Sundar, S.
    Thimma, R.
    Mathew, A.
    Sulaiman, A.
    Jalali, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E312 - E313
  • [44] Dosimetric Impact of In-Air Spot Size Variations for Commissioning a Room-Matched Beam Model for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Zhang, Y.
    Giebeler, A.
    Mascia, A.
    Piskulich, F.
    Perles, L.
    Lepage, R.
    Dong, L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 112 - +
  • [45] Dynamically Collimated Spatially Fractionated (GRID) Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Smith, B.
    Allen, B.
    Hyer, D.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [46] Strategies for Motion Robust Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Esophageal Cancer
    Moller, Ditte Sloth
    Poulsen, Per Rugaard
    Hagner, Andreas
    Dufour, Mathieu
    Nordsmark, Marianne
    Nyeng, Tine Bisballe
    Mortensen, Hanna Rahbek
    Lutz, Christina Maria
    Hoffmann, Lone
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (02): : 539 - 548
  • [47] A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy
    Langner, Ulrich W.
    Mundis, Michelle
    Strauss, Dan
    Zhu, Mingyao
    Mossahebi, Sina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (01): : 156 - 163
  • [48] Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy of Bulky Tumors: A Feasibility Study
    Halthore, A. N.
    Fellows, Z.
    Tsien, C.
    Deville, C., Jr.
    Wright, J. L.
    Meyer, J. J.
    Li, H.
    Sheikh, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E523 - E523
  • [49] Neutron Dose Equivalent Evaluation for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy with Apertures
    Geng, C.
    Schuemann, J.
    Moteabbed, M.
    Paganetti, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3466 - 3466
  • [50] MRI Guided Proton Therapy: pencil beam scanning in an MRI fringe field
    Oborn, B. M.
    Dowdell, S.
    Metcalfe, P. E.
    Crozier, S.
    Guatelli, S.
    Rosenfeld, A. B.
    Mohan, R.
    Keall, P. J.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 : S78 - S79