Investigating beam matching for multi-room pencil beam scanning proton therapy

被引:8
|
作者
Rana, Suresh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bennouna, Jaafar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Baptist Hlth South Florida, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami Canc Inst, 8900 N Kendall Dr, Miami, FL 33176 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Herbert Werthe Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] VIT Univ, Sch Adv Sci, Dept Phys, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Beam-matching; Spot size; Range; Absolute dose; Pencil beam scanning; Proton therapy;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-020-00927-7
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the proton beam matching for a multi-room ProteusPLUS pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy system and quantify the agreement among three beam-matched treatment rooms (GTR1, GTR2, and GTR3). In-air spot size measurements were acquired using a 2D scintillation detector at various gantry angles. Range and absolute dose measurements were performed in water at gantry angle 0 degrees. Patient-specific quality assurance (QA) plans of four different disease sites (brain, mediastinum, sacrum, and prostate) and machine QA fields with uniform dose were delivered for various beam conditions. The results from GTR1 were considered as reference values. The average difference in spot sizes between GTR2 and GTR1 was - 0.3% +/- 2.2% (range, - 5.9 to 5.8%). For GTR3 vs. GTR1, the average difference in spot sizes was 0.6% +/- 1.7% (range, - 4.8 to 4.6%). The spot symmetry was found to be <= 4.4%. For proton range, the difference among three rooms was within +/- 0.5 mm. On average, the difference in absolute dose was - 0.1 +/- 0.7% (range, - 1.3 to 2.1%) for GTR2 vs. GTR1 and 0.7 +/- 0.6% (range, - 0.1 to 2.1%) for GTR3 vs. GTR1. The average gamma passing rate of patient-specific QA measurements (n = 29) was >= 98.6%. The average gamma passing rate of machine QA fields was 99.9%. In conclusion, proton beam matching was quantified for three beam-matched rooms of an IBA ProteusPLUS system with a PBS dedicated nozzle. It is feasible to match the spot size and absolute dose within +/- 5% and +/- 2%, respectively. Proton range can be matched within +/- 0.5 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:1241 / 1251
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Outcome of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Children With Rhabdomyosarcoma
    Leiser, D.
    Malyapa, R. S.
    Albertini, F.
    Kliebsch, U.
    Mikroutsikos, L.
    Morach, P.
    Bojaxhiu, B.
    Bolsi, A.
    Walser, M.
    Timmermann, B.
    Lomax, A. J.
    Schneider, R.
    Weber, D. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E547 - E548
  • [32] Detectors for quality assurance of pencil beam scanning gantries for proton therapy
    Gagnon-Moisan, F.
    van der Meer, R.
    Chowdhuri, Z.
    Eichin, M.
    Koenig, S.
    Schmid, F. -J.
    Weber, D. C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 : S44 - S45
  • [33] IBA PROTON PENCIL BEAM SCANNING : VALIDATION
    Dessy, F.
    Linthout, N.
    Gillis, S.
    Closset, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 99 : S529 - S529
  • [34] Adaptive Planning Workflow in a Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy Center
    Blakey, M.
    Price, S.
    Robison, B.
    Niek, S.
    Moe, S.
    Renegar, J.
    Mark, A.
    Spenser, W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3282 - 3282
  • [35] Adaptive Spot Placement Method for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Lin, B.
    Lin, Y.
    McDonald, M.
    Bradley, J.
    Fu, S.
    Gao, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [36] Monte Carlo Dose Verification of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Giantsoudi, D.
    Clasie, B.
    Grassberger, C.
    Dowdell, S.
    Depauw, N.
    Madden, T.
    Kooy, H.
    Paganetti, H.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [37] Institutional Audit of Adaptive Re-Planning With Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy
    Gaikwad, U. S.
    Chilukuri, S.
    Nangia, S.
    Patro, K.
    Thiyagarajan, R.
    Sharma, D.
    Mp, N.
    Wakde, M.
    Jalali, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E498 - E498
  • [38] Adaptive re-planning with image guided pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy
    Chilukuri, S.
    Gaikwad, U.
    Nangia, S.
    Patro, K.
    Thiagarajan, R.
    Mp, N.
    Sunder, S.
    Burela, N.
    Thimma, R.
    Panda, P.
    Jalali, R.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1197 - S1198
  • [39] Pencil Beam Dose Algorithm for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy with Scanning Proton Beams
    Wang, H.
    Zheng, H.
    Cao, R.
    Jia, J.
    Song, J.
    He, T.
    Wu, Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06)
  • [40] Planning for Proton Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS): Applications of Gradient Optimization for Field Matching
    Lin, H.
    Kirk, M.
    Zhai, H.
    Ding, X.
    Liu, H.
    Hill-Kayser, C.
    Lustig, R.
    Tochner, Z.
    Deville, C.
    Vapiwala, N.
    McDonough, J.
    Both, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 284 - +