Telecine calibration and image quality evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Lukicic, T [1 ]
Grgic, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Croatian Radio Televis, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
来源
关键词
telecine; TAF; video signal measurement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this paper video signal level of the filmed material is measured on telecine with respect to a TAF (Telecine Analysis Film) as reference value. On telecine calibrated according to TAF, projection of filmed material from shooting location need same corrections. Instead of correcting signal, telecine is recalibrated according to the light conditions on shooting location and projects best possible image quality from shooting location. After the transfer, TAF is relaced and created video signal is measured. Results of measurement are compared and differences are established. Differences appear because of different light conditions, deliberately created to achieve artistic atmosphere of the picture, but must be unchanged during the same film scene in order to maintain constant quality level of the particular film part. Monitoring quality of filmed material is possible by control over established differences while transferring material from the same shooting location of the particular film scene. Uniformity of picture parameters during the whole film scene are considered as quality of shot material.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 81
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EVALUATION OF RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE QUALITY
    ROSSMANN, K
    WILLIAMS, JR
    GOODENOUGH, DJ
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1972, 7 (05) : 429 - +
  • [32] EVALUATION OF XERORADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE QUALITY
    ZEMAN, GH
    RAO, GUV
    OSTERMAN, FA
    RADIOLOGY, 1976, 119 (03) : 689 - 695
  • [33] Image quality and noise evaluation
    Fah, CY
    Rijal, OM
    Noor, NM
    SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND ITS APPLICATIONS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 465 - 468
  • [34] An Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics
    J Photogr Sci, 1 (07):
  • [35] An Evaluation Method for the Magnetometer Calibration Data Quality
    Wu, Yinfeng
    Liu, Guolong
    Yu, Ning
    Feng, Renjian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLEXIBLE AND PRINTABLE SENSORS AND SYSTEMS (FLEPS), 2021,
  • [36] Image quality metrics for the evaluation of print quality
    Pedersen, Marius
    Bonnier, Nicolas
    Hardeberg, Jon Y.
    Albregtsen, Fritz
    IMAGE QUALITY AND SYSTEM PERFORMANCE VIII, 2011, 7867
  • [37] IMAGE QUALITY EVALUATION USING IMAGE QUALITY RULER AND GRAPHICAL MODEL
    Wang, Weibao
    Allebach, Jan
    Guo, Yandong
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP), 2015, : 2256 - 2259
  • [38] Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment: A framework for evaluation of clinical image quality
    Hemmsen, Martin Christian
    Pedersen, Mads Moller
    Nikolov, Svetoslav Ivanov
    Nielsen, Michael Backmann
    Jensen, Jorgen Arendt
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: ULTRASONIC IMAGING, TOMOGRAPHY, AND THERAPY, 2010, 7629
  • [39] Evaluation of nonlinear calibration on the satellite TIR image applications
    Lu, Feng
    Zhang, Xiaohu
    Wu, Xiao
    Cui, Peng
    Xu, Na
    EARTH OBSERVING MISSIONS AND SENSORS: DEVELOPMENT, IMPLEMENTATION, AND CHARACTERIZATION III, 2014, 9264
  • [40] RADARSAT-1 image quality and calibration - A continuing success
    Srivastava, SK
    Hawkins, RK
    Banik, BT
    Adamovic, M
    Gray, R
    Murnaghan, K
    Lukowski, TI
    Jefferies, WC
    CALIBRATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SATELLITE SENSORS AND ACCURACY OF DERIVED PHYSICAL PARAMETERS, 2001, 28 (01): : 99 - 108