Modeling Effective Dosages in Hormetic Dose-Response Studies

被引:61
|
作者
Belz, Regina G. [1 ]
Piepho, Hans-Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Agroecol Unit, Inst Plant Prod & Agroecol Trop & Subtrop, D-7000 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Crop Sci, Bioinformat Unit, D-7000 Stuttgart, Germany
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
PARTHENIUM-HYSTEROPHORUS L; PLANT-GROWTH; HORMESIS; ALLELOPATHY; STIMULATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0033432
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Two hormetic modifications of a monotonically decreasing log-logistic dose-response function are most often used to model stimulatory effects of low dosages of a toxicant in plant biology. As just one of these empirical models is yet properly parameterized to allow inference about quantities of interest, this study contributes the parameterized functions for the second hormetic model and compares the estimates of effective dosages between both models based on 23 hormetic data sets. Based on this, the impact on effective dosage estimations was evaluated, especially in case of a substantially inferior fit by one of the two models. Methodology/Principal Findings: The data sets evaluated described the hormetic responses of four different test plant species exposed to 15 different chemical stressors in two different experimental dose-response test designs. Out of the 23 data sets, one could not be described by any of the two models, 14 could be better described by one of the two models, and eight could be equally described by both models. In cases of misspecification by any of the two models, the differences between effective dosages estimates (0-1768%) greatly exceeded the differences observed when both models provided a satisfactory fit (0-26%). This suggests that the conclusions drawn depending on the model used may diverge considerably when using an improper hormetic model especially regarding effective dosages quantifying hormesis. Conclusions/Significance: The study showed that hormetic dose responses can take on many shapes and that this diversity can not be captured by a single model without risking considerable misinterpretation. However, the two empirical models considered in this paper together provide a powerful means to model, prove, and now also to quantify a wide range of hormetic responses by reparameterization. Despite this, they should not be applied uncritically, but after statistical and graphical assessment of their adequacy.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dose-response modeling for developmental neurotoxicity data
    Mehdi Razzaghi
    Ralph Kodell
    Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2000, 7 : 191 - 203
  • [42] Hormetic dose-response of halogenated organic pollutants on Microcystis aeruginosa: Joint toxic action and mechanism
    Zhang, Yueheng
    Gao, Qing
    Liu, Shu-shen
    Tang, Liang
    Li, Xin-Gui
    Sun, Haoyu
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 829
  • [43] Biological stress response terminology: Integrating the concepts of adaptive response and preconditioning stress within a hormetic dose-response framework
    Calabrese, Edward J.
    Bachmann, Kenneth A.
    Bailer, A. John
    Bolger, P. Michael
    Borak, Jonathan
    Cai, Lu
    Cedergreen, Nina
    Cherian, M. George
    Chiueh, Chuang C.
    Clarkson, Thomas W.
    Cook, Ralph R.
    Diamond, David M.
    Doolittle, David J.
    Dorato, Michael A.
    Duke, Stephen O.
    Feinendegen, Ludwig
    Gardner, Donald E.
    Hart, Ronald W.
    Hastings, Kenneth L.
    Hayes, A. Wallace
    Hoffmann, George R.
    Ives, John A.
    Jaworowski, Zbigniew
    Johnson, Thomas E.
    Jonas, Wayne B.
    Kaminski, Norbert E.
    Keller, John G.
    Klaunig, James E.
    Knudsen, Thomas B.
    Kozumbo, Walter J.
    Lettleri, Teresa
    Liu, Shu-Zheng
    Maisseu, Andre
    Maynard, Kenneth I.
    Masoro, Edward J.
    McClellan, Roger O.
    Mehendale, Harlhara M.
    Mothersill, Carmel
    Newlin, David B.
    Nigg, Herbert N.
    Oehme, Frederick W.
    Phalen, Robert F.
    Philbert, Martin A.
    Rattan, Suresh I. S.
    Riviere, Jim E.
    Rodricks, Joseph
    Sapolsky, Robert M.
    Scott, Bobby R.
    Seymour, Colin
    Sinclair, David A.
    TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 222 (01) : 122 - 128
  • [44] Interval estimation of the median effective dose for a logistic dose-response curve
    Harris, P
    Hann, M
    Kirby, SPJ
    Dearden, JC
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 1999, 26 (06) : 715 - 722
  • [45] DOSE-RESPONSE STUDIES WITH PANCURONIUM, VECURONIUM AND THEIR COMBINATION
    FERRES, CJ
    MIRAKHUR, RK
    PANDIT, SK
    CLARKE, RSJ
    GIBSON, FM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 18 (06) : 947 - 950
  • [46] IMMUNOTOXIC EFFECTS OF PROPANIL - DOSE-RESPONSE STUDIES
    BARNETT, J
    SODERBERG, L
    GANDY, J
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1988, 2 (04): : A915 - A915
  • [47] DOSE-RESPONSE STUDIES WITH BENZO[ALPHA]PYRENE
    WYNDER, EL
    SPRANGER, JW
    FARK, MM
    CANCER, 1960, 13 (01) : 106 - 110
  • [48] EXACT POWER COMPUTATION FOR DOSE-RESPONSE STUDIES
    TANG, ML
    HIRJI, KF
    VOLLSET, SE
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (20) : 2261 - 2272
  • [49] DOSE-RESPONSE STUDIES OF CARCINOGENESIS IN RATS BY NITROSODIETHYLAMINE
    LIJINSKY, W
    REUBER, MD
    RIGGS, CW
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1981, 41 (12) : 4997 - 5003
  • [50] The need for dose-response studies: time for a reminder?
    Shuster, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2020, 183 (06) : 1148 - 1148