A scoping review of personalisation in the UK: approaches to social work and people with learning disabilities

被引:21
|
作者
Sims, David [1 ]
Gulyurtlu, Sandra S. Cabrita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greenwich, Sch Hlth & Social Care, London SE9 2UG, England
关键词
autonomy; choice and control; people with learning disabilities; personalisation; self-directed support; social work; CARE; USER;
D O I
10.1111/hsc.12048
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
There have been rapid developments in personalisation of health and social care in the UK over the past 5years to develop a more flexible model of provision based upon greater choice and control for service users. This has been important for people with learning disabilities who are often dependent on others such as social workers to support their autonomy and independence. This article discusses a study carried out to explore the impact of personalisation on people with learning disabilities and the role of social workers to support this. A scoping review of the UK literature from 1996 to 2011 was conducted. It was found that there has not been a significant amount of empirical research in this area. Some studies, such as reports by InControl, have suggested that when implemented well, personalisation can have a positive impact on the lives of people with learning disabilities. Other literature highlighted the limitations and critiques of personalisation. Without the right support to manage budgets and autonomy, people with learning disabilities could be left vulnerable. In respect of the social workers, the finding of the review was that there was a lack of guidance on how to implement personalisation and a perceived threat to their traditional practice role, resulting in barriers to implementation. Although the literature emphasises the need for choice, control and autonomy in personalisation, the conclusion of this study is that more research needs to be carried out into how professional roles fit into and can support this process.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Emergency Medical Care of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review
    York, Jana
    Wechuli, Yvonne
    Karbach, Ute
    OPEN ACCESS EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 14 : 441 - 456
  • [32] Employer Practices for Employment of People With Disabilities: A Literature Scoping Review
    Karpur, Arun
    VanLooy, Sara A.
    Bruyere, Susanne M.
    REHABILITATION RESEARCH POLICY AND EDUCATION, 2014, 28 (04): : 225 - 241
  • [33] Impact of infection outbreak on people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review
    Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
    Nijs, Sara L. P.
    van Oorsouw, Wietske M. W. J.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2021, 46 (04): : 291 - 299
  • [34] Psychological eHealth interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review
    Oudshoorn, Cathelijn E. M.
    Frielink, Noud
    Nijs, Sara L. P.
    Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (04) : 950 - 972
  • [35] Organizational Practices for the Inclusion of People with Disabilities. A Scoping Review
    van Berkel, Rik
    Breit, Eric
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [36] COVID-19 in people with developmental disabilities: a scoping review
    de Castilho, Lia Silva
    Lages, Frederico Santos
    Vilaca, Enio Lacerda
    Passos, Pedro Schmidt
    Tavares, Thaynara Patricia
    Dias, Danilo Rocha
    ACTA PAULISTA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2023, 36
  • [37] A Review of Critical, Person-centred and Clinical Approaches to Reminiscence Work for People with Intellectual Disabilities
    Van Puyenbroeck, Joris
    Maes, Bea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION, 2008, 55 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [38] Social Work With People With Disabilities in Croatia: A Qualitative Study
    Leutar, Zdravka
    Markovic, Eva
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK IN DISABILITY & REHABILITATION, 2011, 10 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [39] Work Integration Social Enterprises for People with Disabilities in Japan
    Laratta, Rosario
    Nakagawa, Sachiko
    NONPROFIT POLICY FORUM, 2016, 7 (04) : 487 - 507