Easy come, easy go The role of windfall money in lab and field experiments

被引:70
|
作者
Carlsson, Fredrik [1 ]
He, Haoran [2 ]
Martinsson, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Econ, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Charitable giving; Dictator game; Laboratory experiment; Field experiment; Windfall money; MEASURING SOCIAL PREFERENCES; ENDOWMENT HETEROGENEITY; DICTATOR; ALTRUISM; ORIGIN; IMPACT; CONTEXT; YOURS; FAIR;
D O I
10.1007/s10683-012-9326-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A growing number of experimental studies focus on the differences between the lab and the field. One important difference between many lab and field experiments is how the endowment is obtained. By conducting a dictator game experiment, we investigate the influences of windfall and earned endowment on behavior in the laboratory and in the field. We find subjects donate more in both environments if the endowment is a windfall gain. However, although the experimental design was intended to control for all effects other than environment, there are significant differences in behavior between the lab and the field for both windfall and earned endowment. This points to the importance of discussing the context when interpreting both laboratory and field experiment results as well as when conducting replication studies.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 207
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条