Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial

被引:25
|
作者
Mari, Francesco Saverio [1 ]
Di Cesare, Tatiana [1 ]
Novi, Luciano [1 ]
Gasparrini, Marcello [1 ]
Berardi, Giammauro [1 ]
Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo [1 ]
Liverani, Andrea [1 ]
Brescia, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Med & Surg Sci & Translat Med, Sch Med & Psychol,Fac Med & Psychol, I-00189 Rome, Italy
关键词
Ghost ileostomy; Laparoscopic lower rectal resection; Anterior rectal resection; Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic dehiscence; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; RISK-FACTORS; COLORECTAL-SURGERY; COLON-CANCER; STOMA; COMPLICATIONS; CARCINOMA; REVERSAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3974-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Anastomotic leakage following anterior rectal resection is the most important and most commonly faced complication of laparoscopy and open surgery. To prevent this complication, the construction of a preventing stoma is usually adopted. It is not easy to decide whether to construct a protective stoma in patients with a medium risk of anastomotic leakage. In these patients, ghost ileostomy (GI), a pre-stage ileostomy that can be externalized and opened if needed, has proved useful. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the advantages of GI in laparoscopic rectal resection. All patients with surgical indications for laparoscopic rectal resection who were at medium risk for anastomotic leakage from January 2007 to January 2013 were included and were randomly divided in 2 groups. All of the patients were subjected to laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with the performance of GI (group A) or without the construction of any protective stoma (group B). The presence and severity of clinically evident postoperative anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications and reinterventions were investigated. Of the 55 patients allocated to group A, 3 experienced anastomotic leakage compared with 4 in group B. The patients with GI experienced a lower severity of anastomotic leakage and shorter hospitalization compared with the patients in group B. None of the patients with GI and anastomotic leakage required laparotomy to treat the dehiscence. The use of GI in laparoscopic rectal resections in patients at medium risk for anastomotic leakage was useful because it allowed for the avoidance of stoma creation in all of the patients, thus reducing the number of stomas performed, improving the quality of life of the patients and preserving, in most cases, the benefits gained by laparoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:2590 / 2597
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback that does not have the power to conclude - Reply
    Norton, C
    Kamm, MA
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (05) : 1497 - 1497
  • [42] Does aspirin have a role in improving pregnancy outcome for women with the antiphospholipid syndrome? A randomized controlled trial
    Pattison, NS
    Chamley, LW
    Birdsall, M
    Zanderigo, AM
    Liddell, HS
    McDougall, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (04) : 1008 - 1012
  • [43] Laparotomic approach in "achalasia surgery" Have still a role in minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery era?
    Pignatelli, Carlo
    Lieto, Eva
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2013, 84 (05) : 511 - 514
  • [44] Inbag Morcellation Applied to the Laparoscopic Surgery of Leiomyoma: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bensouda-Miguet, Chloe
    Nohuz, Erdogan
    Cerruto, Emanuele
    Buenerd, Annie
    Nadaud, Beatrice
    Moret, Stephanie
    Chene, Gautier
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 2021
  • [45] Safety, efficacy, and operability of a newly developed absorbable adhesion barrier (GM142) in patients with primary rectal cancer scheduled for diverting ileostomy during laparoscopic surgery: Randomized controlled trial
    Watanabe, Jun
    Yamaguchi, Shigeki
    Takemasa, Ichiro
    Yasui, Masayoshi
    Hirano, Yasumitsu
    Nakano, Daisuke
    Shiomi, Akio
    Munakata, Shinya
    Naito, Masanori
    Tsukamoto, Shunsuke
    Ishibe, Atsushi
    Kuriu, Yoshiaki
    Uchima, Yasutake
    Mori, Shinichiro
    Kanazawa, Hideki
    Wakabayashi, Go
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Ezu, Muneaki
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2022, 6 (04): : 515 - 522
  • [46] Surgical management of rectal prolapse: in the era of laparoscopic surgery
    Essani, R.
    Bergamaschi, R.
    Uranues, S.
    EUROPEAN SURGERY-ACTA CHIRURGICA AUSTRIACA, 2009, 41 (05): : 203 - 208
  • [47] Superiority of laparoscopic rectal surgery: Towards a new era
    Fukunaga, Yosuke
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2011, 3 (10): : 142 - 146
  • [48] Enhanced recovery program after laparoscopic colorectal surgery during the era of COVID-19: a randomized controlled trial
    Negm, Said
    Mousa, Bassam
    Shafiq, Ahmed
    Abozaid, Mohamed
    Allah, Ehab Abd
    Attia, Adel
    Farag, Ahmed
    CHIRURGIA-ITALY, 2023, 36 (03): : 128 - 133
  • [49] The efficacy of ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis
    Mu, Yu
    Zhao, Linxian
    He, Hongyu
    Zhao, Huimin
    Li, Jiannan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [50] Early Laparoscopic Ileostomy Reversal After Rectal Cancer Surgery - Technique and Outcomes
    Copaescu, Catalin
    Smeu, Bogdan
    Catanescu, Elena
    Andrei, Dan
    Tomulescu, Victor
    CHIRURGIA, 2019, 114 (03) : 392 - 400