Does ghost ileostomy have a role in the laparoscopic rectal surgery era? A randomized controlled trial

被引:25
|
作者
Mari, Francesco Saverio [1 ]
Di Cesare, Tatiana [1 ]
Novi, Luciano [1 ]
Gasparrini, Marcello [1 ]
Berardi, Giammauro [1 ]
Laracca, Giovanni Guglielmo [1 ]
Liverani, Andrea [1 ]
Brescia, Antonio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma La Sapienza, St Andrea Hosp, Dept Med & Surg Sci & Translat Med, Sch Med & Psychol,Fac Med & Psychol, I-00189 Rome, Italy
关键词
Ghost ileostomy; Laparoscopic lower rectal resection; Anterior rectal resection; Anastomotic leak; Anastomotic dehiscence; LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; RISK-FACTORS; COLORECTAL-SURGERY; COLON-CANCER; STOMA; COMPLICATIONS; CARCINOMA; REVERSAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3974-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Anastomotic leakage following anterior rectal resection is the most important and most commonly faced complication of laparoscopy and open surgery. To prevent this complication, the construction of a preventing stoma is usually adopted. It is not easy to decide whether to construct a protective stoma in patients with a medium risk of anastomotic leakage. In these patients, ghost ileostomy (GI), a pre-stage ileostomy that can be externalized and opened if needed, has proved useful. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study to evaluate the advantages of GI in laparoscopic rectal resection. All patients with surgical indications for laparoscopic rectal resection who were at medium risk for anastomotic leakage from January 2007 to January 2013 were included and were randomly divided in 2 groups. All of the patients were subjected to laparoscopic anterior rectal resection with the performance of GI (group A) or without the construction of any protective stoma (group B). The presence and severity of clinically evident postoperative anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications and reinterventions were investigated. Of the 55 patients allocated to group A, 3 experienced anastomotic leakage compared with 4 in group B. The patients with GI experienced a lower severity of anastomotic leakage and shorter hospitalization compared with the patients in group B. None of the patients with GI and anastomotic leakage required laparotomy to treat the dehiscence. The use of GI in laparoscopic rectal resections in patients at medium risk for anastomotic leakage was useful because it allowed for the avoidance of stoma creation in all of the patients, thus reducing the number of stomas performed, improving the quality of life of the patients and preserving, in most cases, the benefits gained by laparoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:2590 / 2597
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection
    Ihnat, Peter
    Gunkova, Petra
    Peteja, Matus
    Vavra, Petr
    Pelikan, Anton
    Zonca, Pavel
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (11): : 4809 - 4816
  • [32] Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection
    Peter Ihnát
    Petra Guňková
    Matúš Peteja
    Petr Vávra
    Anton Pelikán
    Pavel Zonča
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 4809 - 4816
  • [33] Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer
    Bernasconi, M.
    Metzger, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (04) : 619 - 620
  • [34] Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer
    Lujan, J.
    Valero, G.
    Hernandez, Q.
    Sanchez, A.
    Frutos, M. D.
    Parrilla, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (09) : 982 - 989
  • [35] Early closure compared to late closure of temporary ileostomy in rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial study
    Ahmadi-Amoli, Hadi
    Rahimi, Mohsen
    Abedi-kichi, Raziyeh
    Ebrahimian, Nazli
    Hosseiniasl, Seyed-Mohammad
    Hajebi, Reza
    Rahimpour, Ehsan
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2023, 408 (01)
  • [36] Ileostomy versus fecal diversion device to protect anastomosis after rectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Kim, Sohyun
    Jung, Sang Hun
    Kim, Jae Hwang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (05) : 811 - 819
  • [37] Early closure compared to late closure of temporary ileostomy in rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial study
    Hadi Ahmadi-Amoli
    Mohsen Rahimi
    Raziyeh Abedi-kichi
    Nazli Ebrahimian
    Seyed-Mohammad Hosseiniasl
    Reza Hajebi
    Ehsan Rahimpour
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [38] Ileostomy versus fecal diversion device to protect anastomosis after rectal surgery: a randomized clinical trial
    Sohyun Kim
    Sang Hun Jung
    Jae Hwang Kim
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2019, 34 : 811 - 819
  • [39] Ghost ileostomy versus conventional loop ileostomy in patients undergoing low anterior resection for rectal cancer (DRKS00013997): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Huettner, Felix J.
    Probst, Pascal
    Mihaljevic, Andre
    Contin, Pietro
    Doerr-Harim, Colette
    Ulrich, Alexis
    Schneider, Martin
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Diener, Markus K.
    Knebel, Phillip
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [40] Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic Resection Versus Open Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Randomized, Controlled Trial from China
    Liang, Xiaobo
    Hou, Shenghuai
    Liu, Haiyi
    Li, Yaoping
    Jiang, Bo
    Bai, Wenqi
    Li, Guodong
    Wang, Wengyuan
    Feng, Yi
    Guo, Juan
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 21 (05): : 381 - 385