Nomogram Predicting Adverse Pathology Outcome on Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Men

被引:9
|
作者
Nasri, Jordan [1 ]
Barthe, Flora
Parekh, Sneha
Ratnani, Parita
Pedraza, Adriana M.
Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
Olivier, Jonathan
Villers, Arnauld
Tewari, Ash
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Icahn Sch Med, Dept Urol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
ACTIVE-SURVEILLANCE; BIOPSY; VALIDATION; INTERMEDIATE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2022.02.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a prediction model to predict the risk of adverse pathology outcome on final pathology in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) men. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was a monocentric retrospective analysis of 426 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for low-risk PCa. The validation cohort included 103 men from another hospital. Adverse pathology outcome was defined either by upgrading on RP Gleason Score (GS) (from GS 3+3 to GS >= 3+4 with Gleason pattern 4 >= 10%) or a non-organ confined disease (pathologic stage >= pT3a). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build nomogram for predicting adverse pathology outcome. Nomogram validation was performed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and comparing nomogram-predicted probabilities with actual rates of adverse pathology outcome in the external cohort. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate and compare the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates between the two groups. RESULTS Of 426 men in the development cohort, 45.7% showed adverse pathology outcome on RP. Age, body mass index, prostate specific antigen density, history of prior negative biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging prostate imaging reporting and data system score 4-5 and percentage of positive biopsies were significant predictors in multivariate analysis. A nomogram was constructed with an area under curve of 87%. There was agreement between predicted and actual rates of adverse pathology outcome in the validation cohort. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates in patients with and without adverse pathology outcome was 70% and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSION This novel nomogram would help identify low-risk PCa men at risk of adverse pathology outcome and can be relevant for treatment decision-making. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 195
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Nomogram Predicting the Probability of Early Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
    Walz, Jochen
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Reuther, Alwyn
    Saad, Fred
    Graefen, Markus
    Huland, Hartwig
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (02): : 601 - 607
  • [42] Risk of suicide in men with low-risk prostate cancer
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Sandin, Fredrik
    Fall, Katja
    Lambe, Mats
    Adolfsson, Jan
    Stattin, Par
    Bill-Axelson, Anna
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (07) : 1588 - 1599
  • [43] FINAL PATHOLOGY UPGRADE OF PATIENTS WITH LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Rozet, F.
    Secin, F. P.
    Sanchez-Salas, R. E.
    Prapotnich, D.
    Galiano, M.
    Flamand, V
    Cathala, N.
    Mombet, A.
    Barret, E.
    Cathelineau, X.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (02) : 115 - 115
  • [44] FINAL PATHOLOGY UPGRADE OF PATIENTS WITH LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER TREATED WITH RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Barret, Eric
    Rozet, Francois
    Ercolani, Matthew
    Secin, Fernando
    Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
    Prapotnich, Dominique
    Barret, Eric
    Cathelineau, Xavier
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 : A60 - A61
  • [45] Standardizing the definition of adverse pathology for lower risk men undergoing radical prostatectomy
    Kozminski, Michael A.
    Tomlins, Scott
    Cole, Adam
    Singhal, Udit
    Lu, Louis
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Palapattu, Ganesh S.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Weizer, Alon Z.
    Mehra, Rohit
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Miller, David C.
    He, Chang
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (09) : 415.e1 - 415.e6
  • [46] Radical Prostatectomy (RP) Findings In Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer (PC) In a Contemporary Triethnic Population - Implications for Active Surveillance (AS)
    Braunhut, Beth L.
    Freire, Rochelle
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2018, 31 : 330 - 330
  • [47] Radical Prostatectomy (RP) Findings In Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer (PC) In a Contemporary Triethnic Population - Implications for Active Surveillance (AS)
    Braunhut, Beth L.
    Freire, Rochelle
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 98 : 330 - 330
  • [48] Immediate vs deferred radical prostatectomy in low-risk men: a snapshot of pathological outcomes in a Victorian cohort of men from the Prostate Cancer Registry
    Weerakoon, M.
    Papa, N.
    Murphy, D.
    Evans, S.
    Millar, J.
    Bolton, D.
    Frydenberg, M.
    Lawrentschuk, N.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 115 : 107 - 107
  • [49] What is the molecular pathology of low-risk prostate cancer?
    Hemamali Samaratunga
    Jonathan I. Epstein
    World Journal of Urology, 2008, 26 : 431 - 436
  • [50] Radical Prostatectomy Findings in White Hispanic/Latino Men With NCCN Very Low-risk Prostate Cancer Detected by Template Biopsy
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.
    Lyapichev, Kirill
    Chinea, Felix M.
    Prakash, Nachiketh Soodana
    Pollack, Alan
    Gonzalgo, Mark L.
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Jorda, Merce
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (08) : 1125 - 1132