Nomogram Predicting Adverse Pathology Outcome on Radical Prostatectomy in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Men

被引:9
|
作者
Nasri, Jordan [1 ]
Barthe, Flora
Parekh, Sneha
Ratnani, Parita
Pedraza, Adriana M.
Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
Olivier, Jonathan
Villers, Arnauld
Tewari, Ash
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Icahn Sch Med, Dept Urol, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
ACTIVE-SURVEILLANCE; BIOPSY; VALIDATION; INTERMEDIATE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2022.02.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a prediction model to predict the risk of adverse pathology outcome on final pathology in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) men. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was a monocentric retrospective analysis of 426 men who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for low-risk PCa. The validation cohort included 103 men from another hospital. Adverse pathology outcome was defined either by upgrading on RP Gleason Score (GS) (from GS 3+3 to GS >= 3+4 with Gleason pattern 4 >= 10%) or a non-organ confined disease (pathologic stage >= pT3a). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to build nomogram for predicting adverse pathology outcome. Nomogram validation was performed by calculating the area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and comparing nomogram-predicted probabilities with actual rates of adverse pathology outcome in the external cohort. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate and compare the biochemical recurrence-free survival rates between the two groups. RESULTS Of 426 men in the development cohort, 45.7% showed adverse pathology outcome on RP. Age, body mass index, prostate specific antigen density, history of prior negative biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging prostate imaging reporting and data system score 4-5 and percentage of positive biopsies were significant predictors in multivariate analysis. A nomogram was constructed with an area under curve of 87%. There was agreement between predicted and actual rates of adverse pathology outcome in the validation cohort. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rates in patients with and without adverse pathology outcome was 70% and 98%, respectively. CONCLUSION This novel nomogram would help identify low-risk PCa men at risk of adverse pathology outcome and can be relevant for treatment decision-making. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 195
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Immediate renal transplantation after radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer
    Kreydin, Evgeniy I.
    Ko, Dicken S. C.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 27 (01) : 162 - 167
  • [22] Interval to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy does not affect survival in men with low-risk prostate cancer
    D. M. Bolton
    A. Ta
    M. Bagnato
    D. Muller
    N. L. Lawrentschuk
    G. Severi
    R. R. Syme
    G. G. Giles
    World Journal of Urology, 2014, 32 : 431 - 435
  • [23] Interval to biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy does not affect survival in men with low-risk prostate cancer
    Bolton, D. M.
    Ta, A.
    Bagnato, M.
    Muller, D.
    Lawrentschuk, N. L.
    Severi, G.
    Syme, R. R.
    Giles, G. G.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (02) : 431 - 435
  • [24] Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Brockman, John A.
    Alanee, Shaheen
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Wood, David P.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Bianco, Fernando J., Jr.
    Rabah, Danny M.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ciezki, Jay P.
    Gao, Tianming
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (06) : 1160 - 1167
  • [25] DEFINING ADVERSE PATHOLOGY FOR LOWER RISK MEN UNDERGOING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Kozminski, Michael A.
    Tomlins, Scott
    Singhal, Udit
    Lu, Louis
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Palapattu, Ganesh S.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Weizer, Alon Z.
    Mehra, Rohit
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Miller, David C.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E6 - E6
  • [26] Is Delayed Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Low-Risk Screen-Detected Prostate Cancer Associated With a Higher Risk of Unfavorable Outcomes?
    van den Bergh, Roderick C. N.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Khatami, Ali
    Aus, Gunnar
    Pihl, Carl Gustaf
    Wolters, Tineke
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Hugosson, Jonas
    CANCER, 2010, 116 (05) : 1281 - 1290
  • [27] Delay of radical prostatectomy and risk of biochemical progression in men with low risk prostate cancer
    Freedland, SJ
    Kane, CJ
    Amling, CL
    Aronson, WJ
    Presti, JC
    Terris, MK
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 1298 - 1302
  • [28] PREDICTING METASTASIS IN MEN WITH LOCALIZED HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCER UNDERGOING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Wilkins, Lamont
    Ridwan, Alam
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Nyame, Yaw A.
    Yousefi, Kasra
    Chappidi, Meera R.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth B.
    Sundi, Debasish
    Chapin, Brian F.
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E169 - E170
  • [29] Subtyping the Risk of Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance Based on Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy
    Patel, Hiten D.
    Gupta, Mohit
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Partin, Alan W.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (05): : 1068 - 1074
  • [30] Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria
    Mitsuzuka, Koji
    Narita, Shintaro
    Koie, Takuya
    Kaiho, Yasuhiro
    Tsuchiya, Norihiko
    Yoneyama, Takahiro
    Kakoi, Narihiko
    Kawamura, Sadafumi
    Tochigi, Tatsuo
    Habuchi, Tomonori
    Ohyama, Chikara
    Arai, Yoichi
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (06) : 914 - 920