Biomechanics of implant augmentation

被引:0
|
作者
Windolf, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] AO Forschungsinst Davos, CH-7270 Davos, Switzerland
来源
UNFALLCHIRURG | 2015年 / 118卷 / 09期
关键词
Augmentation; Cement; Implant; Osteoporosis; PMMA; CEMENT AUGMENTATION; IN-VITRO; TEMPERATURE EVALUATION; SCREW AUGMENTATION; OSTEOPOROTIC BONE; FRACTURES; FAILURE; PLATE; MANAGEMENT; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00113-015-0050-7
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The rising incidence of osteoporotic fractures requires novel treatment strategies. Implant augmentation with bone cement is considered to be a promising approach but the benefits and risks need to be carefully evaluated. Experimental investigation of the biomechanical potential and the associated risks with special reference to the osteoporotic proximal femur and proximal humerus. Even small amounts of bone cement (3 ml) applied to the proximal femur in combination with intramedullary nailing led to more than a 50 % increase in the number of test cycles before failure. The heat and pressure generated in the bone did not exceed critical thresholds. Short to midterm effects of subchondral cement placement on the adjacent cartilage can be excluded. The risk for cement leakage needs to be considered. Implant augmentation offers high biomechanical potential to prevent mechanical complications after fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone. Early and confident mobilization of elderly patients therefore appears to be possible. With appropriate handling, associated risks seem controllable; however, implant augmentation cannot be applied as a routine concept for osteoporotic fracture management. The application requires careful evaluation on a case by case basis under comprehensive consideration of mechanical and biological factors.
引用
收藏
页码:765 / 771
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE FINITE ELEMENT TECHNIQUE IN THE ANALYSYS OF IMPLANT BIOMECHANICS
    Ioanid, Nicoleta
    Necu, N.
    Burlui, V.
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2010, 2 (04): : 26 - 31
  • [22] Pterygoid implants as alternative to bone augmentation in implant dentistryPterygoid implants as alternative to bone augmentation in implant dentistry
    Vishtasb Broumand
    Jayson Kirchhofer
    British Dental Journal, 2025, 238 (2) : 99 - 109
  • [23] The biomechanics of metaphyseal cone augmentation in revision knee replacement
    Hu, Jingrui
    Gundry, Michael
    Zheng, Keke
    Zhong, Jingxiao
    Hourigan, Patrick
    Meakin, Judith R.
    Winlove, C. Peter
    Toms, Andrew D.
    Knapp, Karen M.
    Chen, Junning
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2022, 131
  • [24] Finite element analysis of mini implant biomechanics on peri-implant bone
    Hisam, Muhammad Juzaili
    Zaman, Izzuddin
    Shari, Safian
    Kurniawan, Denni
    Nor, Fethma M.
    DIGITAL MANUFACTURING TRANSFORMING INDUSTRY TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE GROWTH, 2019, 30 : 308 - 314
  • [25] Augmentation of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone
    Clifford B. Jones
    Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2012, 10 : 328 - 336
  • [26] Breast augmentation: implant selection and technique
    Ernst, J.
    Reichenberger, M.
    Engel, H.
    Rau, S.
    Germann, G.
    JOURNAL FUR ASTHETISCHE CHIRURGIE, 2020, 13 (04): : 153 - 166
  • [27] GINGIVAL AUGMENTATION FOR OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANT PROSTHESES
    PAREL, SM
    BALSHI, TJ
    SULLIVAN, DY
    CARDENAS, ER
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1986, 56 (02): : 208 - 211
  • [28] NEW INFLATABLE IMPLANT FOR BREAST AUGMENTATION
    WISE, RJ
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1974, 53 (03) : 360 - 363
  • [29] Bone Augmentation Procedures in Implant Dentistry
    Chiapasco, Matteo
    Casentini, Paolo
    Zaniboni, Marco
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2009, 24 : 237 - 259
  • [30] Aesthetic breast augmentation: The double implant
    Bosch, G
    Jacobo, O
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2001, 25 (05) : 353 - 356