Pharmacodynamic Assessment of Platelet Reactivity After a Loading Dose of Prasugrel or Clopidogrel in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

被引:6
|
作者
Ichikawa, Shinya [1 ]
Tsukahara, Kengo [1 ]
Minamimoto, Yugo [1 ]
Kimura, Yuichiro [1 ]
Matsuzawa, Yasushi [1 ]
Maejima, Nobuhiko [1 ]
Iwahashi, Noriaki [1 ]
Hibi, Kiyoshi [1 ]
Kosuge, Masami [1 ]
Ebina, Toshiaki [1 ]
Kimura, Kazuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Yokohama City Univ, Med Ctr, Div Cardiol, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
Clopidogrel; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Platelet reactivity; Prasugrel; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ADVERSE CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; 60 MG PRASUGREL; PRIMARY PCI; STENT THROMBOSIS; PRASFIT-ACS; JAPANESE PATIENTS; POOLED ANALYSIS; RAPID ACTIVITY;
D O I
10.1253/circj.CJ-16-0513
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Few studies have compared the platelet reactivity of prasugrel and clopidogrel in the acute phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and Results: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in 78 patients with STEMI within 12 h of onset. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a Japanese standard loading dose of prasugrel 20 mg or clopidogrel 300 mg. Platelet reactivity was serially assessed using the VerifyNow-P2Y12 assay, the results of which were expressed as P2Y12-reaction-units (PRU). PRU values were significantly lower in the prasugrel group (n=38) than in the clopidogrel group (n=40) at 3 h, 24 h, and 14 days after loading (191+/-101 vs. 271+/-50, 147+/-80 vs. 261+/-57, and 171+/-67 vs. 221+/-70, respectively, P<0.05), although the PRU levels at baseline (231+/-57 vs. 237+/-58, P=0.65) and 1 h after loading (282+/-65 vs. 291+/-62, P=0.54) were similar. As compared with the baseline values, the PRU levels at 1, 3 and 24 h after clopidogrel loading were significantly higher (respectively, P<0.05), whereas only the PRU at 1 h after prasugrel was elevated (P<0.001). Conclusions: In Japanese patients with STEMI who undergo primary PCI, prasugrel provides stronger platelet inhibition than clopidogrel from 3 h after loading, whereas platelet reactivity remained elevated within 24 h after clopidogrel loading.
引用
收藏
页码:2520 / +
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Zhang, Zefeng
    Kolm, Paul
    Spiesser, Julie
    Jackson, Joseph
    Gabriel, Sylvie
    Zhao, Liping
    Weintraub, William
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 827 - 827
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Zhang, Z.
    Kolm, P.
    Spiesser, J.
    Jackson, J.
    Gabriel, S.
    Zhao, L.
    Weintraub, W.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 27 : 862 - 863
  • [33] The platelet phenotype in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is different from non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Schmidt, Rachel A.
    Morrell, Craig N.
    Ling, Frederick S.
    Simlote, Preya
    Fernandez, Genaro
    Rich, David Q.
    Adler, David
    Gervase, Joe
    Cameron, Scott J.
    TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 195 : 1 - 12
  • [34] THE PLATELET PHENOTYPE IN PATIENTS WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IS DIFFERENT FROM NON-ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Cameron, Scott J.
    Schmidt, Rachel A.
    Simlote, Preya
    Ling, Fred
    Fernandez, Genaro
    Gervase, Joe
    Adler, David
    Morrell, Craig
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (04) : 785 - 786
  • [35] Temporary Adjunctive Cilostazol vs Clopidogrel Loading for ST-segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Akihito Tanaka
    Hideki Ishii
    Masaki Sakakibara
    Satoshi Okumura
    Yasushi Jinno
    Koji Okada
    Susumu Suzuki
    Yosuke Inoue
    Toyoaki Murohara
    American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, 2014, 14 : 131 - 136
  • [36] Temporary Adjunctive Cilostazol vs Clopidogrel Loading for ST-segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Tanaka, Akihito
    Ishii, Hideki
    Sakakibara, Masaki
    Okumura, Satoshi
    Jinno, Yasushi
    Okada, Koji
    Suzuki, Susumu
    Inoue, Yosuke
    Murohara, Toyoaki
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DRUGS, 2014, 14 (02) : 131 - 136
  • [37] One-year incidence and clinical impact of bleeding events in patients treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Lattuca, Benoit
    Fabbro-Peray, Pascale
    Leclercq, Florence
    Schmutz, Laurent
    Ledermann, Bertrand
    Cornillet, Luc
    Benezet, Jean-Francois
    Macia, Jean-Christophe
    de La Coussaye, Jean-Emmanuel
    Messner-Pellenc, Patrick
    Cayla, Guillaume
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2016, 109 (05) : 337 - 347
  • [38] Changes in platelet maturity and reactivity following acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Pedersen, Oliver Buchhave
    Nissen, Peter H.
    Pasalic, Leonardo
    Hvas, Anne-Mette
    Kristensen, Steen Dalby
    Grove, Erik Lerkevang
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2025, 9 (01)
  • [39] Impact of a 600-mg Loading Dose of Clopidogrel on Long-Term Outcome in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Rhew, Tae-Kyung
    Kim, Weon
    Ha, Sang-Jin
    Kim, Su-Joong
    Kim, Woo-Sik
    Kim, Myung-Kon
    Kim, Gwon-Sam
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 105 (9A): : 31B - 32B
  • [40] Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for residual thrombus burden in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: an optical coherence tomography study
    Yokota, Takashi
    Higuma, Takumi
    Endo, Tomohide
    Nishizaki, Fumie
    Hanada, Kenji
    Yokoyama, Hiroaki
    Yamada, Masahiro
    Okumura, Ken
    Tomita, Hirofumi
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2018, 29 (08) : 663 - 669