The platelet phenotype in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is different from non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

被引:15
|
作者
Schmidt, Rachel A.
Morrell, Craig N.
Ling, Frederick S.
Simlote, Preya
Fernandez, Genaro
Rich, David Q.
Adler, David
Gervase, Joe
Cameron, Scott J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Aab Cardiovasc Res Inst, Box CVRI, Rochester, NY 14652 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASES; ASPIRIN RESISTANCE; DIABETES-MELLITUS; ARTERY-DISEASE; WORKING GROUP; IN-VIVO; ACTIVATION; MATRIX-METALLOPROTEINASE-9; CLOPIDOGREL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trsl.2017.11.006
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
It is assumed that platelets in diseased conditions share similar properties to platelets in healthy conditions, although this has never been examined in detail for myocardial infarction (MI). We examined platelets from patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) compared with platelets from healthy volunteers to evaluate for differences in platelet phenotype and function. Platelet activation was examined and postreceptor signal transduction pathways were assessed. Platelet-derived plasma biomarkers were evaluated by receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. Maximum platelet activation through the thromboxane receptor was greater in STEMI than in NSTEMI but less through protease activated receptor 1. Extracellular-signal related-kinase 5 activation, which can activate platelets, was increased in platelets from subjects with STEMI and especially in platelets from patients with NSTEMI. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) protein content and enzymatic activity were several-fold greater in platelets with MI than in control. Mean plasma MMP9 concentration in patients with MI distinguished between STEMI and NSTEMI (area under curve (AUC) 75% (confidence interval (CI) 60-91), P= 0.006) which was superior to troponin T (AUC 66% (CI 48-85, P= 0.08), predicting STEMI with 80% sensitivity (95% CI 56-94), 90% specificity (CI 68-99), 70% AUC (CI 54-86, P< 0.0001), and NSTEMI with 50% sensitivity (CI 27-70), 90% specificity (CI 68-99), 70% AUC (CI 54-86, P= 0.03). Platelets from patients with STEMI and NSTEMI show differences in platelet surface receptor activation and postreceptor signal transduction, suggesting the healthy platelet phenotype in which antiplatelet agents are often evaluated in preclinical studies is different from platelets in patients with MI.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE PLATELET PHENOTYPE IN PATIENTS WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION IS DIFFERENT FROM NON-ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Cameron, Scott J.
    Schmidt, Rachel A.
    Simlote, Preya
    Ling, Fred
    Fernandez, Genaro
    Gervase, Joe
    Adler, David
    Morrell, Craig
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (04) : 785 - 786
  • [2] Is The Diagnosis ST-Segment Elevation or Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
    Tsutsumi, Katsuhiko
    Tsukahara, Kengo
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2018, 138 (23) : 2715 - 2717
  • [3] Infarct characteristics and outcome of patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Demirkiran, A.
    Hoeven, N.
    Janssens, G.
    Lemkes, J.
    Everaars, H.
    Ven, P.
    Cauteren, Y.
    Leeuwen, M.
    Nap, A.
    Bekkers, S.
    Royen, N.
    Smulders, M.
    Rossum, A.
    Robbers, L.
    Nijveldt, R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 41 : 195 - 195
  • [4] Myocardial infarction: when ST-segment elevation versus non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction paradigm fails
    Terlecki, Michal
    Rajzer, Marek
    Czarnecka, Danuta
    [J]. KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2019, 77 (03) : 396 - 396
  • [5] Telomere Length and Oxidative Stress in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Inandiklioglu, Nihal
    Demir, Vahit
    Ercan, Mujgan
    [J]. CELL BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, VOL 14: STEM CELLS IN LINEAGE SPECIFIC DIFFERENTIATION AND DISEASE, 2021, 1347 : 183 - 195
  • [6] Prognosis of patients with cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction: The difference between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Tsai, Ming-Lung
    Hsieh, Ming-Jer
    Chen, Chun-Chi
    Wu, Victor Chien-Chia
    Lan, Wen-Ching
    Huang, Yu-Tung
    Hsieh, I-Chang
    Chang, Shang-Hung
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (36) : E30426
  • [7] Guideline Adherence After ST-Segment Elevation Versus Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Somma, Keith A.
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Fonarow, Gregg C.
    Cannon, Christopher P.
    Cox, Margueritte
    Laskey, Warren
    Peacock, W. Frank
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Peterson, Eric D.
    Schwamm, Lee
    Saxon, Leslie A.
    [J]. CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2012, 5 (05): : 654 - 661
  • [8] Quality of care by classification of myocardial infarction - Treatment patterns for ST-segment elevation vs non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Roe, MT
    Parsons, LS
    Pollack, CV
    Canto, JG
    Barron, HV
    Every, NR
    Rogers, WJ
    Peterson, ED
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 165 (14) : 1630 - 1636
  • [9] ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Yerem Yeghiazarians
    Peter H. Stone
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2002, 4 (1) : 3 - 23
  • [10] ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Birgit Vogel
    Bimmer E. Claessen
    Suzanne V. Arnold
    Danny Chan
    David J. Cohen
    Evangelos Giannitsis
    C. Michael Gibson
    Shinya Goto
    Hugo A. Katus
    Mathieu Kerneis
    Takeshi Kimura
    Vijay Kunadian
    Duane S. Pinto
    Hiroki Shiomi
    John A. Spertus
    P. Gabriel Steg
    Roxana Mehran
    [J]. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 5