The platelet phenotype in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is different from non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

被引:15
|
作者
Schmidt, Rachel A.
Morrell, Craig N.
Ling, Frederick S.
Simlote, Preya
Fernandez, Genaro
Rich, David Q.
Adler, David
Gervase, Joe
Cameron, Scott J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Aab Cardiovasc Res Inst, Box CVRI, Rochester, NY 14652 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASES; ASPIRIN RESISTANCE; DIABETES-MELLITUS; ARTERY-DISEASE; WORKING GROUP; IN-VIVO; ACTIVATION; MATRIX-METALLOPROTEINASE-9; CLOPIDOGREL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trsl.2017.11.006
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
It is assumed that platelets in diseased conditions share similar properties to platelets in healthy conditions, although this has never been examined in detail for myocardial infarction (MI). We examined platelets from patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) compared with platelets from healthy volunteers to evaluate for differences in platelet phenotype and function. Platelet activation was examined and postreceptor signal transduction pathways were assessed. Platelet-derived plasma biomarkers were evaluated by receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. Maximum platelet activation through the thromboxane receptor was greater in STEMI than in NSTEMI but less through protease activated receptor 1. Extracellular-signal related-kinase 5 activation, which can activate platelets, was increased in platelets from subjects with STEMI and especially in platelets from patients with NSTEMI. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) protein content and enzymatic activity were several-fold greater in platelets with MI than in control. Mean plasma MMP9 concentration in patients with MI distinguished between STEMI and NSTEMI (area under curve (AUC) 75% (confidence interval (CI) 60-91), P= 0.006) which was superior to troponin T (AUC 66% (CI 48-85, P= 0.08), predicting STEMI with 80% sensitivity (95% CI 56-94), 90% specificity (CI 68-99), 70% AUC (CI 54-86, P< 0.0001), and NSTEMI with 50% sensitivity (CI 27-70), 90% specificity (CI 68-99), 70% AUC (CI 54-86, P= 0.03). Platelets from patients with STEMI and NSTEMI show differences in platelet surface receptor activation and postreceptor signal transduction, suggesting the healthy platelet phenotype in which antiplatelet agents are often evaluated in preclinical studies is different from platelets in patients with MI.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predictive value of electrocardiographic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction equivalents for detecting acute coronary artery occlusion in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Wisniewski, Pawel
    Rostoff, Pawel
    Gajos, Grzegorz
    Nessler, Jadwiga
    Kruszelnicka, Olga
    [J]. KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2019, 77 (06) : 624 - 631
  • [32] Anticoagulation for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Eikelboom, John W.
    Weitz, Jeffrey I.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2009, 119 (09) : 1186 - 1188
  • [33] Usefulness of the CODE ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Program to Improve Quality Assurance in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Ginanjar, Eka
    Sjaaf, Amal C.
    Alwi, Idrus
    Sulistiadi, Wahyu
    Darmawan, Ede Surya
    Wibowo, Adik
    Liastuti, Lies Dina
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 165 : 27 - 32
  • [34] ST-segment Elevation: Myocardial Infarction or Simulacrum?
    Patel, Nachiket
    Ngo, Elizabeth
    Paterick, Timothy E.
    Ammar, Khawaja Afzal
    Chandrasekaran, Krishnaswamy
    Tajik, A. Jamil
    [J]. REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (3-4) : 85 - 99
  • [35] Diffuse ST-Segment Elevation in Myocardial Infarction
    Yang, Hongbo
    Zhang, Feng
    Qian, Juying
    Ge, Junbo
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 131 (06): : E247 - E248
  • [36] Acute Myocardial Infarction with ST-Segment Elevation
    Castro, W. Quiroga
    Conci, E.
    Zelaya, F.
    Isa, M.
    Sala, J.
    Pacheco, G.
    Balestrini, C.
    Serra, C.
    Quiroga, C.
    Bossi, A.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2008, 118 (12) : E475 - E475
  • [37] Transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Jolobe, Oscar M. P.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 156 (04)
  • [38] The challenge of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Cohen, M.
    Roubin, G.
    Kuepper, F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2007, 61 (12) : 2079 - 2092
  • [39] An embolic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Feng, Lv
    Yuan, Tao
    [J]. CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2022, 31 (01) : E25 - E26
  • [40] Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: to be or not to be?
    Manzur Barbur, Maria Carolina
    Martinez-Avila, Maria Cristina
    Imitola Madero, Angelica
    Garcia Nunez, Jose Fernando
    Garcia Dominguez, Juan Camilo
    [J]. ARCHIVE OF CLINICAL CASES, 2022, 9 (01): : 19 - 23