The platelet phenotype in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is different from non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

被引:15
|
作者
Schmidt, Rachel A.
Morrell, Craig N.
Ling, Frederick S.
Simlote, Preya
Fernandez, Genaro
Rich, David Q.
Adler, David
Gervase, Joe
Cameron, Scott J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med, Aab Cardiovasc Res Inst, Box CVRI, Rochester, NY 14652 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASES; ASPIRIN RESISTANCE; DIABETES-MELLITUS; ARTERY-DISEASE; WORKING GROUP; IN-VIVO; ACTIVATION; MATRIX-METALLOPROTEINASE-9; CLOPIDOGREL;
D O I
10.1016/j.trsl.2017.11.006
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
It is assumed that platelets in diseased conditions share similar properties to platelets in healthy conditions, although this has never been examined in detail for myocardial infarction (MI). We examined platelets from patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) compared with platelets from healthy volunteers to evaluate for differences in platelet phenotype and function. Platelet activation was examined and postreceptor signal transduction pathways were assessed. Platelet-derived plasma biomarkers were evaluated by receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. Maximum platelet activation through the thromboxane receptor was greater in STEMI than in NSTEMI but less through protease activated receptor 1. Extracellular-signal related-kinase 5 activation, which can activate platelets, was increased in platelets from subjects with STEMI and especially in platelets from patients with NSTEMI. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) protein content and enzymatic activity were several-fold greater in platelets with MI than in control. Mean plasma MMP9 concentration in patients with MI distinguished between STEMI and NSTEMI (area under curve (AUC) 75% (confidence interval (CI) 60-91), P= 0.006) which was superior to troponin T (AUC 66% (CI 48-85, P= 0.08), predicting STEMI with 80% sensitivity (95% CI 56-94), 90% specificity (CI 68-99), 70% AUC (CI 54-86, P< 0.0001), and NSTEMI with 50% sensitivity (CI 27-70), 90% specificity (CI 68-99), 70% AUC (CI 54-86, P= 0.03). Platelets from patients with STEMI and NSTEMI show differences in platelet surface receptor activation and postreceptor signal transduction, suggesting the healthy platelet phenotype in which antiplatelet agents are often evaluated in preclinical studies is different from platelets in patients with MI.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Focus on ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    King, Spencer B., III
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (01) : 228 - 228
  • [42] Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Goodman, Shaun G.
    Menon, Venu
    Cannon, Christopher P.
    Steg, Gabriel
    Ohman, E. Magnus
    Harrington, Robert A.
    [J]. CHEST, 2008, 133 (06) : 708S - 775S
  • [43] Impact of ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Regionalization Programs on the Treatment and Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Montoy, Juan Carlos C.
    Shen, Yu-Chu
    Brindis, Ralph G.
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    Hsia, Renee Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (03): : 1 - 15
  • [44] Intracoronary electrocardiogram ST-segment elevation in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and its association with culprit lesion location and myocardial injury
    Hishikari, Keiichi
    Yonetsu, Taishi
    Lee, Tetsumin
    Koura, Kenji
    Murai, Tadashi
    Iwai, Toshiyuki
    Takagi, Takamitsu
    Isobe, Mitsuaki
    Iesaka, Yoshito
    Kakuta, Tsunekazu
    [J]. EUROINTERVENTION, 2014, 10 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [45] Predictors and Clinical Implications of Minimal ST-Segment Elevation in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Jang, Se Yong
    Bae, Myung Hwan
    Kim, Jae Hee
    Park, Sun Hee
    Lee, Jang Hoon
    Yang, Dong Heon
    Park, Hun Sik
    Cho, Yongkeun
    Chae, Shung Chull
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 128 (03) : 273 - 281
  • [46] Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Revascularization for Everyone?
    de Winter, Robbert J.
    Tijssen, Jan G. P.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2012, 5 (09) : 903 - 905
  • [47] Polymoysitis mimicking non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Bittenbring, J. T.
    Chen, C. -H.
    Fries, P.
    Boehm, M.
    Kilter, H.
    [J]. DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2010, 135 (49) : 2456 - 2458
  • [48] Unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    John A. Ambrose
    Zaheed Tai
    [J]. Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2002, 4 (1) : 25 - 39
  • [49] Management and in-hospital mortality of patients with non-ST-segment elevation vs. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Kosovo
    Batalli, A.
    Poniku, A.
    Haliti, E.
    Shita, D.
    Ferati, A.
    Leka, R.
    Elezi, S.
    Shatri, F.
    Selmani, H.
    Bytyci, I.
    Henein, M. Y.
    Bajraktari, G. Gani
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 : 332 - 333
  • [50] PREDICTORS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS OF MINIMAL ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION IN PATIENTS WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
    Jang, Se Yong
    Choi, Won Suk
    Bae, Myung Hwan
    Lee, Jang Hoon
    Yang, Dong Heon
    Park, Hun Sik
    Cho, Yongkeun
    Chae, Shung Chull
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 63 (12) : A77 - A77