Recommendations for pathologic staging (pTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals

被引:172
|
作者
Rice, T. W. [1 ]
Ishwaran, H. [2 ]
Hofstetter, W. L. [3 ]
Kelsen, D. P. [4 ]
Apperson-Hansen, C. [5 ]
Blackstone, E. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, 9500 Euclid Ave Desk JJ 40, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miami, FL USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Hosp, Houston, TX USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
epidemiology; esophagectomy; esophagogastric junction; oncology; AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; 7TH EDITION; SURVIVAL; ADENOCARCINOMA; SYSTEM; IMPACT; 6TH;
D O I
10.1111/dote.12533
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We report analytic and consensus processes that produced recommendations for pathologic stage groups (pTNM) of esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer for the AJCC/UICC cancer staging manuals, 8th edition. The Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration provided data for 22,654 patients with epithelial esophageal cancers; 13,300 without preoperative therapy had pathologic assessment after esophagectomy or endoscopic treatment. Risk-adjusted survival for each patient was developed using random survival forest analysis to identify data-driven pathologic stage groups wherein survival decreased monotonically with increasing group, was distinctive between groups, and homogeneous within groups. The AJCC Upper GI Task Force, by smoothing, simplifying, expanding, and assessing clinical applicability, produced consensus pathologic stage groups. For pT1-3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and pT1-2N0M0 adenocarcinoma, pT was inadequate for grouping; subcategorizing pT1 and adding histologic grade enhanced staging; cancer location improved SCC staging. Consensus eliminated location for pT2N0M0 and pT3N0M0G1 SCC groups, and despite similar survival, restricted stage 0 to pTis, excluding pT1aN0M0G1. Metastases markedly reduced survival; pT, pN, and pM sufficiently grouped advanced cancers. Stage IIA and IIB had different compositions for SCC and adenocarcinoma, but similar survival. Consensus stage IV subgrouping acknowledged pT4N+ and pN3 cancers had poor survival, similar to pM1. Anatomic pathologic stage grouping, based on pTNM only, produced identical consensus stage groups for SCC and adenocarcinoma at the cost of homogeneity in early groups. Pathologic staging can neither direct pre-treatment decisions nor aid in prognostication for treatment other than esophagectomy or endoscopic therapy. However, it provides a clean, single therapy reference point for esophageal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 905
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The 8th edition AJCC/UICC TNM staging for p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma: is there space for improvement?
    Sharma, Shachi Jenny
    Wagner, Steffen
    Reder, Henrike Simone Frauke
    Kroll, Tobias
    Wuerdemann, Nora
    Klussmann, Jens Peter
    Wittekindt, Claus
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 275 (12) : 3087 - 3091
  • [42] The 8th UICC/AJCC TNM edition for non-small cell lung cancer staging: getting off to a flying start?
    Lancia, Andrea
    Merizzoli, Elisa
    Filippi, Andrea Riccardo
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [43] Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation
    Fang, Cheng
    Wang, Wei
    Deng, Jing-Yu
    Sun, Zhe
    Seeruttun, Sharvesh Raj
    Wang, Zhen-Ning
    Xu, Hui-Mian
    Liang, Han
    Zhou, Zhi-Wei
    CANCER COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 38
  • [44] Staging cancers of the oral cavity according to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM system: Issues and recommendations
    Lacheretz-Szablewski, Vanessa
    Garrel, Renaud
    Guillot, Constant
    Costes-Martineau, Valerie
    ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 2023, 43 (04) : 289 - 297
  • [45] The 8th edition AJCC/UICC TNM staging for p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma: is there space for improvement?
    Shachi Jenny Sharma
    Steffen Wagner
    Henrike Simone Frauke Reder
    Tobias Kroll
    Nora Wuerdemann
    Jens Peter Klussmann
    Claus Wittekindt
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2018, 275 : 3087 - 3091
  • [46] A population-based validation study of the 8th edition UICC/AJCC TNM staging system for cutaneous melanoma
    Hynes, Matthew C.
    Nguyen, Paul
    Groome, Patti A.
    Asai, Yuka
    Mavor, Meaghan E.
    Baetz, Tara D.
    Hanna, Timothy P.
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [47] Validation of the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy
    Kang, Min
    Zhou, Pingting
    Li, Guisheng
    Yan, Haolin
    Feng, Guosheng
    Liu, Meilian
    Zhu, Jinxian
    Wang, Rensheng
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (41) : 70586 - 70594
  • [48] A population-based validation study of the 8th edition UICC/AJCC TNM staging system for cutaneous melanoma
    Matthew C. Hynes
    Paul Nguyen
    Patti A. Groome
    Yuka Asai
    Meaghan E. Mavor
    Tara D. Baetz
    Timothy P. Hanna
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [49] International Survey of Staging for Retinoblastoma Provides Evidence for the 2016 8th Edition AJCC TNMH Retinoblastoma Cancer Staging
    Gallie, B. L.
    Mallipatna, A.
    Finger, P.
    Zhao, J.
    Kivela, T.
    Chantada, G.
    Lau, W.
    Ramirez-Ortiz, M. A.
    Catala, J.
    Yousef, Y.
    Ushakova, T.
    Yarovoy, A.
    Wilson, M.
    Khetan, V.
    Walsh, J.
    Blair, P.
    Renner, L.
    Teekappanava, N.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2016, 63 : S21 - S21
  • [50] UICC drops the ball in the 8th edition TNM staging of urological cancers
    Delahunt, Brett
    Egevad, Lars
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Varma, Murali
    Verrill, Clare
    Cheville, John
    Kristiansen, Glen
    Corbishley, Catherine
    Berney, Daniel M.
    HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2017, 71 (01) : 5 - 11