Recommendations for pathologic staging (pTNM) of cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction for the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging manuals

被引:172
|
作者
Rice, T. W. [1 ]
Ishwaran, H. [2 ]
Hofstetter, W. L. [3 ]
Kelsen, D. P. [4 ]
Apperson-Hansen, C. [5 ]
Blackstone, E. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, 9500 Euclid Ave Desk JJ 40, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miami, FL USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Hosp, Houston, TX USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
epidemiology; esophagectomy; esophagogastric junction; oncology; AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; 7TH EDITION; SURVIVAL; ADENOCARCINOMA; SYSTEM; IMPACT; 6TH;
D O I
10.1111/dote.12533
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
We report analytic and consensus processes that produced recommendations for pathologic stage groups (pTNM) of esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer for the AJCC/UICC cancer staging manuals, 8th edition. The Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration provided data for 22,654 patients with epithelial esophageal cancers; 13,300 without preoperative therapy had pathologic assessment after esophagectomy or endoscopic treatment. Risk-adjusted survival for each patient was developed using random survival forest analysis to identify data-driven pathologic stage groups wherein survival decreased monotonically with increasing group, was distinctive between groups, and homogeneous within groups. The AJCC Upper GI Task Force, by smoothing, simplifying, expanding, and assessing clinical applicability, produced consensus pathologic stage groups. For pT1-3N0M0 squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and pT1-2N0M0 adenocarcinoma, pT was inadequate for grouping; subcategorizing pT1 and adding histologic grade enhanced staging; cancer location improved SCC staging. Consensus eliminated location for pT2N0M0 and pT3N0M0G1 SCC groups, and despite similar survival, restricted stage 0 to pTis, excluding pT1aN0M0G1. Metastases markedly reduced survival; pT, pN, and pM sufficiently grouped advanced cancers. Stage IIA and IIB had different compositions for SCC and adenocarcinoma, but similar survival. Consensus stage IV subgrouping acknowledged pT4N+ and pN3 cancers had poor survival, similar to pM1. Anatomic pathologic stage grouping, based on pTNM only, produced identical consensus stage groups for SCC and adenocarcinoma at the cost of homogeneity in early groups. Pathologic staging can neither direct pre-treatment decisions nor aid in prognostication for treatment other than esophagectomy or endoscopic therapy. However, it provides a clean, single therapy reference point for esophageal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 905
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Pancreas and Hepatobiliary Cancers
    Chun, Yun Shin
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Vauthey, Jean-Nicolas
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (04) : 845 - 847
  • [22] Proposed Modification of the 8th Edition of the AJCC Staging System for Gastric Cancer
    Jiang, Yannan
    Tu, Ruhong
    Lu, Jun
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhu, Jianhua
    Tang, Wei
    Gu, Menghui
    Huang, Changming
    Gu, Xinhua
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2020, 33 (10) : 932 - 938
  • [23] Validations of the 8th edition of AJCC staging system for patients with pancreatic cancer
    Zhu, X.
    Ju, X.
    Cao, Y.
    Zhao, X.
    Shen, Y.
    Cao, F.
    Qing, S.
    Gu, L.
    Fang, F.
    Jia, Z.
    Zhang, H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 141 : S19 - S19
  • [24] Prognostic Impact of AJCC/UICC 8th Edition New Staging Rules in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Wuerdemann, Nora
    Wagner, Steffen
    Sharma, Shachi Jenny
    Prigge, Elena -Sophie
    Reuschenbach, Miriam
    Gattenloehner, Stefan
    Klussmann, Jens Peter
    Wittekindt, Claus
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 7
  • [25] Risk prediction in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Direct comparison of the MEGNA score and the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC Cancer staging system
    Hahn, Felix
    Mueller, Lukas
    Maehringer-Kunz, Aline
    Schotten, Sebastian
    Dilber, Christoph
    Hinrichs, Jan B.
    Maschke, Sabine K.
    Galle, Peter R.
    Bartsch, Fabian
    Lang, Hauke
    Weinmann, Arndt
    Kloeckner, Roman
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02):
  • [26] Staging for Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Utility of the 8th Edition AJCC Staging System
    Yi, M.
    Hunt, K.
    Bedrosian, I.
    Chavez-MacGregor, M.
    Mittendorf, E. A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 : S25 - S26
  • [27] AJCC 7th edition staging classification is more applicable than AJCC 8th edition staging classification for invasive IPMN
    Fan, Zhiyao
    Cheng, He
    Jin, Kaizhou
    Gong, Yitao
    Huang, Qiuyi
    Xu, Jin
    Ni, Quanxing
    Yu, Xianjun
    Liu, Chen
    Luo, Guopei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [28] Will the 8th editions of the UICC & AJCC staging manuals improve the pathological diagnosis of extranodal extension from cervical lymph nodes?
    Barrett, Andrew W.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 72 : 197 - 197
  • [29] AJCC 7th edition staging classification is more applicable than AJCC 8th edition staging classification for invasive IPMN
    Zhiyao Fan
    He Cheng
    Kaizhou Jin
    Yitao Gong
    Qiuyi Huang
    Jin Xu
    Quanxing Ni
    Xianjun Yu
    Chen Liu
    Guopei Luo
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 17
  • [30] Implications for Breast Cancer Restaging Based on the 8th Edition AJCC Staging Manual
    Plichta, Jennifer K.
    Ren, Yi
    Thomas, Samantha M.
    Greenup, Rachel A.
    Fayanju, Oluwadamilola M.
    Rosenberger, Laura H.
    Hyslop, Terry
    Hwang, E. Shelley
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (01) : 169 - 176