Evidence-based guidelines for migraine headache in the primary care setting: Pharmacological management for prevention of migraine

被引:52
|
作者
Rapoport, Alan
Mauskop, Alexander
Diener, Hans-Christoph
Schwalen, Susanne
Pfeil, Joop
机构
[1] New England Ctr Headache, Stamford, CT 06902 USA
[2] New York Headache Ctr, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Essen Gesamthsch, Dept Neurol, Essen, Germany
[4] Janssen Cilag EMEA, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Estimate Med Stat BV, Doesburg, Netherlands
来源
HEADACHE | 2006年 / 46卷 / 07期
关键词
topiramate; migraine prevention; headache;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4610.2006.00506.x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective.-To demonstrate that topiramate is an effective and generally well-tolerated migraine preventive therapy when used for up to 14 months. Background.-Topiramate 100 and 200 mg/d significantly reduced mean monthly migraine frequency during 2 large, 26-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Only a small number of clinical trials have examined the long-term (>= 1 year) effectiveness and safety of migraine preventive therapies. Methods.-Five hundred sixty-seven patients with an established history of migraine with or without aura were enrolled in this 8-month, open-label extension of 2 large (49 US and 52 US and Canadian medical centers), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, 26-week trials of identical design. To be eligible for the open-label extension, patients were required to have either completed the double-blind phase of the 2 pivotal migraine prevention trials or withdrew after 4 weeks due to lack of efficacy. All eligible patients, regardless of type or dose of study medication (topiramate or placebo) received in the double-blind phase, were titrated to a clinically effective dose of open-label topiramate based on physician judgment of patient response. Efficacy of topiramate was measured as the change in mean monthly migraine frequency. Results.-The mean topiramate dose during the open-label extension phase was 124.7 mg/d and 150.3 mg/d for patients on placebo (n = 159) or topiramate (n = 408), respectively, during the double-blind phase (N = 567, 91% female, mean age 39.4 years). Patients on topiramate for up to 14 months had 2.2 +/- 2.4 (mean +/- SD) migraines per month after completion of the open-label extension phase (3.4 +/- 2.6 at double-blind endpoint). Patients on topiramate during the open-label extension phase only (placebo during the double-blind phase) had 3.0 +/- 2.9 migraines per month at open-label extension endpoint (4.9 +/- 3.0 migraines per month at double-blind endpoint). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events during the double-blind phase were 22.2% for patients on topiramate and 11.0% for patients on placebo. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events during the open-label extension phase were 8.6% for those patients who had already received topiramate during the double-blind phase and 20.9% for those patients who had previously received placebo. Conclusions.-Patients receiving topiramate experienced a sustained reduction in migraine frequency for up to 14 months. The effectiveness and safety of topiramate was consistent with that observed during 2 26-week pivotal trials.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1160
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evidence-based migraine therapy
    Lines, C
    Allen, C
    McCarroll, K
    CEPHALALGIA, 2001, 21 (09) : 932 - 933
  • [22] Migraine: an evidence-based approach
    Richardson, A.
    SA PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 89 (06) : 19 - 20
  • [23] Migraine: an evidence-based approach
    Richardson, A.
    SA PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 90 (03) : 16 - 17
  • [24] Anticonvulsant drugs for pediatric migraine prevention: An evidence-based review
    Bakola, Eleni
    Skapinakis, Petros
    Tzoufi, Meropi
    Damigos, Dimitris
    Mavreas, Venetsanos
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 13 (09) : 893 - 901
  • [25] Pharmacotherapy of migraine prevention based on the assessment of headache
    Im, Hee-Ji
    Cho, Soo-Jin
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 63 (10): : 644 - 649
  • [26] Successful application of the HCPC guidelines for management of acute migraine in primary care
    Smith, Timothy
    Banks, James W.
    Unger, Jeffrey
    Ruoff, Gary E.
    Hee, Angela
    Smith, Robert
    NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (12) : A261 - A262
  • [27] Impact of Integrating an App into the Management of Patients With Migraine in the Primary Care Setting
    Pohl, G. M.
    Mahabaleshwarkar, R.
    Calamari, L.
    Burns, R.
    Morrow, P.
    Blair, T. M.
    Jurow, T. B.
    Hetherington, T.
    Gowan, E.
    Hill, T.
    Anderson, W. E.
    Furney, S.
    Faries, D.
    Pearlman, E. M.
    Spencer, M. D.
    HEADACHE, 2020, 60 : 109 - 109
  • [28] Evidence-based medicine: botulinum toxin A in migraine and tension-type headache
    H. Göbel
    A. Heinze
    K. Heinze-Kuhn
    W. H. Jost
    Journal of Neurology, 2001, 248 (Suppl 1) : I34 - I38
  • [29] Neuroimaging for Migraine: The American Headache Society Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline
    Evans, Randolph W.
    Burch, Rebecca C.
    Frishberg, Benjamin M.
    Marmura, Michael J.
    Mechtler, Laszlo L.
    Silberstein, Stephen D.
    Turner, Dana P.
    HEADACHE, 2020, 60 (02): : 318 - 336
  • [30] Evidence-based medicine:: botulinum toxin A in migraine and tension-type headache
    Göbel, H
    Heinze, A
    Heinze-Kuhn, K
    Jost, WH
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2001, 248 : S34 - S38