Neuroimaging for Migraine: The American Headache Society Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline

被引:48
|
作者
Evans, Randolph W. [1 ]
Burch, Rebecca C. [2 ]
Frishberg, Benjamin M. [3 ,4 ]
Marmura, Michael J. [5 ]
Mechtler, Laszlo L. [6 ]
Silberstein, Stephen D. [5 ]
Turner, Dana P. [7 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Neurol, 1200 Binz 1370, Houston, TX 77004 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, John R Graham Headache Ctr, Dept Neurol, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Neurol Ctr, Carlsbad, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[5] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Headache Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[6] Headache Ctr, Dent Neurol Inst, Buffalo, NY USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2020年 / 60卷 / 02期
关键词
COMPUTERIZED AXIAL-TOMOGRAPHY; NORMAL ANATOMICAL VARIANTS; INCIDENTAL FINDINGS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CT-SCANS; BRAIN; MRI; ABNORMALITIES; ANGIOGRAPHY; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1111/head.13720
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To provide updated evidence-based recommendations about when to obtain neuroimaging in patients with migraine. Methods Articles were included in the systematic review if they studied adults 18 and over who were seeking outpatient treatment for any type of migraine and who underwent neuroimaging (MRI or CT). Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Clinical Trials were searched from 1973 to August 31, 2018. Reviewers identified studies, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the evidence in duplicate. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results The initial search yielded 2269 publications. Twenty three articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the final review. The majority of studies were retrospective cohort or cross-sectional studies. There were 4 prospective observational studies. Ten studies evaluated the utility of CT only, 9 MRI only, and 4 evaluated both. Common abnormalities included chronic ischemia or atrophy with CT and MRI scanning, and non-specific white matter lesions with MRI. Clinically meaningful abnormalities requiring intervention were relatively rare. Clinically significant neuroimaging abnormalities in patients with headaches consistent with migraine without atypical features or red flags appeared no more common than in the general population. Recommendations There is no necessity to do neuroimaging in patients with headaches consistent with migraine who have a normal neurologic examination, and there are no atypical features or red flags present. Grade A Neuroimaging may be considered for presumed migraine for the following reasons: unusual, prolonged, or persistent aura; increasing frequency, severity, or change in clinical features, first or worst migraine, migraine with brainstem aura, migraine with confusion, migraine with motor manifestations (hemiplegic migraine), late-life migraine accompaniments, aura without headache, side-locked headache, and posttraumatic headache. Most of these are consensus based with little or no literature support. Grade C.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 336
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条