Greenhouse gas abatement optimal deployment of biofuels from crops in Germany

被引:20
|
作者
Millinger, M. [1 ]
Meisel, K. [2 ]
Thraen, D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Bioenergy, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Deutsch Biomasseforsch Zentrum Gemeinnutzige GmbH, Dept Bioenergy Syst, Torgauer Str 116, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Biofuels; Greenhouse gas abatement; GHG; Optimization; Transport; Land use; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The optimal role of biofuels from energy crops for greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement in the German transport sectors is investigated under different progressive long-term scenarios, from a set arable land area corresponding to current use. The sectors included are land passenger and goods transport, shipping and aviation. The GHG abatement from the same land area can be increased by a factor of five through switching to higher yielding biofuel options. Silage maize based biomethane and wood based Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG), in either gaseous or liquefied form are the options with the highest GHG abatement potential per arable land unit, and thus markets where such fuels are an option should be prioritised. Sector fuel restrictions combined with fuel yields resulted in the land passenger sector to be the first priority for maximising GHG abatement, followed by land goods transport, shipping and finally aviation. Only when the previous sectors have been covered by renewable options do the following become relevant and thus a large transition is required before aviation biofuels or any liquid advanced biofuel become the climate optimal use of biomass. Applying admixture quotas to sub-sectors yields a lower GHG abatement than an optimal strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 275
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany
    Millinger, Markus
    Meisel, Kathleen
    Budzinski, Maik
    Thraen, Daniela
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (03)
  • [2] Quantifying uncertainties in greenhouse gas savings and abatement costs with cellulosic biofuels
    Lee, Yuanyao
    Khanna, Madhu
    Chen, Luoye
    Shi, Rui
    Guest, Jeremy
    Blanc-Betes, Elena
    Jiang, Chongya
    Guan, Kaiyu
    Hudiburg, Tara
    De Lucia, Evan H.
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 50 (05) : 1659 - 1684
  • [3] Optimal Timing of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Abatement in Europe
    Sotiriou, Chryso
    Zachariadis, Theodoros
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (10)
  • [4] Greenhouse Gas Abatement Potentials and Economics of Selected Biochemicals in Germany
    Musonda, Frazer
    Millinger, Markus
    Thraen, Daniela
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [5] Evaluation of land use based greenhouse gas abatement measures in Germany
    Roeder, Norbert
    Henseler, Martin
    Liebersbach, Horst
    Kreins, Peter
    Osterburg, Bernhard
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 117 : 193 - 202
  • [6] Developing greenhouse gas marginal abatement cost curves for agricultural emissions from crops and soils in the UK
    MacLeod, Michael
    Moran, Dominic
    Eory, Vera
    Rees, R. M.
    Barnes, Andrew
    Topp, Cairistiona F. E.
    Ball, Bruce
    Hoad, Steve
    Wall, Eileen
    McVittie, Alistair
    Pajot, Guillaume
    Matthews, Robin
    Smith, Pete
    Moxey, Andrew
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2010, 103 (04) : 198 - 209
  • [7] Greenhouse gas abatement - Toward Pareto-optimal decisions under uncertainty
    Manne, AS
    Olsen, TR
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1996, 68 : 267 - 279
  • [8] Estimating greenhouse gas abatement potential of biomass crops in Scotland under various management options
    Shibu, M. E.
    Matthews, R. B.
    Bakam, I.
    Moffat, A. J.
    Baggaley, N. J.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 47 : 211 - 227
  • [9] Greenhouse gas abatement under ambiguity
    [J]. Energy Econ, 2 (91):
  • [10] RANKING OF GREENHOUSE GAS ABATEMENT MEASURES
    WALLIS, MK
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1992, 20 (12) : 1130 - 1133