Evaluation of land use based greenhouse gas abatement measures in Germany

被引:19
|
作者
Roeder, Norbert [1 ]
Henseler, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Liebersbach, Horst [1 ]
Kreins, Peter [1 ]
Osterburg, Bernhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Thunen Inst Rural Studies, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Univ Havre, EDEHN Equipe Econ Le Havre Normandie, F-76600 Le Havre, France
关键词
Agricultural production; Regional supply model; Agro-economic model; Peatland restoration; Bioenergy; EMISSIONS; COSTS; AGRICULTURE; UK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Agricultural production contributes 11% to the total German greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. We compare the efficiency of three different land use based GHG abatement measures in combination and as separately applied measures: the production of short rotation coppices, of feedstocks for biomethane production, and peatland restoration. We evaluate these options with respect to the following criteria: cost efficiency (GHG abatement costs), abatement potential, and impact on agricultural production. We use the regional supply model RAUMIS to investigate the different abatement measures at the sector and regional level. Up to a reduction of GHG emission of 25 * 10(12) g CO2eq peatland restoration is the most cost efficient option. Short rotation coppice allow some cost-efficient mitigation also only at limited scale. Energy maize is only an option if high abatement targets should be met. The joint implementation of several abatement strategies allows meeting specified targets at lower costs. The crowding out effect between the options is limited. The spatial analysis indicates measure specific regional competitiveness and application e.g. short rotation coppice in Eastern and Southern Germany, peat restoration in Northern Germany and energy maize production in central Germany. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 202
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RANKING OF GREENHOUSE GAS ABATEMENT MEASURES
    WALLIS, MK
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1992, 20 (12) : 1130 - 1133
  • [2] Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions in China and the abatement measures
    Zhuang Yahui and Kang DemengResearch Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1991, (03) : 1 - 14
  • [3] A meta-analysis of the greenhouse gas abatement of bioenergy factoring in land use changes
    M. El Akkari
    O. Réchauchère
    A. Bispo
    B. Gabrielle
    D. Makowski
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 8
  • [4] A meta-analysis of the greenhouse gas abatement of bioenergy factoring in land use changes
    El Akkari, M.
    Rechauchere, O.
    Bispo, A.
    Gabrielle, B.
    Makowski, D.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [5] Greenhouse Gas Abatement Potentials and Economics of Selected Biochemicals in Germany
    Musonda, Frazer
    Millinger, Markus
    Thraen, Daniela
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (06)
  • [6] Relative Greenhouse Gas Abatement Cost Competitiveness of Biofuels in Germany
    Millinger, Markus
    Meisel, Kathleen
    Budzinski, Maik
    Thraen, Daniela
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (03)
  • [7] Assessing impacts of greenhouse gas abatement measures on urban freight
    Marquez, L
    Smith, N
    Kilsby, D
    Taylor, M
    Zito, R
    [J]. LOGISTICS SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2004, : 191 - 205
  • [8] Greenhouse gas abatement optimal deployment of biofuels from crops in Germany
    Millinger, M.
    Meisel, K.
    Thraen, D.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 69 : 265 - 275
  • [9] Gold mining greenhouse gas emissions, abatement measures, and the impact of a carbon price
    Ulrich, Sam
    Trench, Allan
    Hagemann, Steffen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 340
  • [10] Small-Scale Modelling of Individual Greenhouse Gas Abatement Measures in Industry
    Huebner, Tobias
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (07)