Greenhouse gas abatement optimal deployment of biofuels from crops in Germany

被引:20
|
作者
Millinger, M. [1 ]
Meisel, K. [2 ]
Thraen, D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Bioenergy, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Deutsch Biomasseforsch Zentrum Gemeinnutzige GmbH, Dept Bioenergy Syst, Torgauer Str 116, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Biofuels; Greenhouse gas abatement; GHG; Optimization; Transport; Land use; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2019.02.005
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The optimal role of biofuels from energy crops for greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement in the German transport sectors is investigated under different progressive long-term scenarios, from a set arable land area corresponding to current use. The sectors included are land passenger and goods transport, shipping and aviation. The GHG abatement from the same land area can be increased by a factor of five through switching to higher yielding biofuel options. Silage maize based biomethane and wood based Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG), in either gaseous or liquefied form are the options with the highest GHG abatement potential per arable land unit, and thus markets where such fuels are an option should be prioritised. Sector fuel restrictions combined with fuel yields resulted in the land passenger sector to be the first priority for maximising GHG abatement, followed by land goods transport, shipping and finally aviation. Only when the previous sectors have been covered by renewable options do the following become relevant and thus a large transition is required before aviation biofuels or any liquid advanced biofuel become the climate optimal use of biomass. Applying admixture quotas to sub-sectors yields a lower GHG abatement than an optimal strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 275
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Greenhouse gas emission abatement: Equitable burden sharing
    D'Evie, F
    Taylor, J
    [J]. AMBIO, 1999, 28 (02) : 148 - 151
  • [42] GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, ABATEMENT AND CONTROL - THE ROLE OF COAL
    SMITH, IM
    THAMBIMUTHU, KV
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 1993, 7 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [43] An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops
    Linquist, Bruce
    van Groenigen, Kees Jan
    Adviento-Borbe, Maria Arlene
    Pittelkow, Cameron
    van Kessel, Chris
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2012, 18 (01) : 194 - 209
  • [44] The economics of greenhouse gas mitigation: Insights from illustrative global abatement scenarios modelling
    Gurney, Andrew
    Ahammad, Helal
    Ford, Melanie
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 : S174 - S186
  • [45] Land clearing and greenhouse gas emissions from Jatropha biofuels on African Miombo Woodlands
    Romijn, Henny A.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (10) : 5751 - 5762
  • [46] Carbon sequestration or abatement? The effect of rising carbon prices on the optimal portfolio of greenhouse-gas mitigation strategies
    van't Veld, K
    Plantinga, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 50 (01) : 59 - 81
  • [47] Impact of the choice of emission metric on greenhouse gas abatement and costs
    van den Berg, Maarten
    Hof, Andries F.
    van Vliet, Jasper
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 10 (02):
  • [48] THE RELATIVE ROLE OF TRACE GAS EMISSIONS IN GREENHOUSE ABATEMENT POLICIES
    KANDLIKAR, M
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1995, 23 (10) : 879 - 883
  • [49] The economics of "when" flexibility in the design of greenhouse gas abatement policies
    Toman, MA
    Morgenstern, RD
    Anderson, J
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 24 : 431 - 460
  • [50] Modeling non-CO2 greenhouse gas abatement
    Hyman, RC
    Reilly, JM
    Babiker, MH
    De Masin, A
    Jacoby, HD
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (03) : 175 - 186