Decision making on power customer satisfaction and enterprise profitability analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:17
|
作者
Medjoudj, R. [1 ]
Laifa, A. [2 ]
Aissani, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bejaia, Dept Elect Engn, Lamos Lab, Bejaia, Algeria
[2] Elect Engn Soc, Bejaia, Algeria
[3] Univ Bejaia, Dept Operat Res, Lamos Lab, Bejaia, Algeria
关键词
electrical energy system; AHP method; economic criteria; customer satisfaction;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2012.660794
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the customer satisfaction of power users using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The objective is to safeguard the interests of electricity consumers and to increase the profitability of the energy distributer. Compared with previous work based on customer questionnaires describing the level of satisfaction, and where the solution is judged to be random due to the low significance of the studied sample, this paper develops a novel strategy. It is based on a global and transparent process regarding the reliability and economic criteria associated with alternatives, highlighting technical and organisational measures taken by the enterprise. The importance of reliability and economic criteria to the alternatives is processed using reliability indices analysis and cost benefit analysis methods. To analyse the customer's reactions to the decisions taken by the system's manager, and to validate the obtained results using the AHP method, we introduce economic criteria often used in the case of an uncertain future. The obtained results indicate the advantage of investment to improve customer satisfaction and enterprise profitability. It is also shown that reliability criteria are significant in the performance of a business and are an important asset for the justification of new projects.
引用
收藏
页码:4793 / 4805
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Group Decision Making with Dispersion in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Scala, Natalie M.
    Rajgopal, Jayant
    Vargas, Luis G.
    Needy, Kim LaScola
    [J]. GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2016, 25 (02) : 355 - 372
  • [22] COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING - THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
    RABINOWITZ, J
    [J]. SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 1992, 26 (01) : 87 - 97
  • [23] A multicriteria logistics-outsourcing decision making using the analytic hierarchy process
    Grewal, Chandandeep Singh
    Sareen, Kuldeep Kumar
    Gill, Sumit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICES TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 9 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [24] Evaluation on customer loyalty of mobile communication enterprise based on analytic hierarchy process
    Han, JY
    Lu, YL
    Li, SS
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (12TH), VOLS 1- 3, 2005, : 1227 - 1230
  • [25] Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process.
    Wang, J
    Chen, QY
    [J]. INTERFACES, 2005, 35 (03) : 260 - 261
  • [26] APPLICATION OF CONCEPTS OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS IN DECISION-MAKING
    Krenicky, Tibor
    Hrebenyk, Liudmyla
    Chernobrovchenko, Vadym
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2022, 30 (04) : 304 - 310
  • [27] USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO DEVELOP HIERARCHY STRUCTURAL MODEL OF CONSUMER DECISION MAKING IN DIGITAL MARKET
    Singh, Depeesh Kumar
    Kumar, Anil
    Dash, Manoj Kumar
    [J]. ASIAN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (01) : 111 - 136
  • [28] Intuitionistic multiplicative analytic hierarchy process in group decision making
    Ren, Peijia
    Xu, Zeshui
    Liao, Huchang
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 101 : 513 - 524
  • [29] THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS IN MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING - A TUTORIAL
    DOLAN, JG
    ISSELHARDT, BJ
    CAPPUCCIO, JD
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1989, 9 (01) : 40 - 50
  • [30] Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making
    Zhu, Bin
    Xu, Zeshui
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 239 (03) : 794 - 801