Evaluation of Portable Point-of-Care CD4 Counter with High Sensitivity for Detecting Patients Eligible for Antiretroviral Therapy

被引:50
|
作者
Manabe, Yukari C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yaping [2 ]
Elbireer, Ali [3 ,4 ]
Auerbach, Brandon [1 ]
Castelnuovo, Barbara [1 ]
机构
[1] Makerere Coll Hlth Sci, Infect Dis Inst, Kampala, Uganda
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Makerere Univ,Clin Core Lab, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
SOUTH-AFRICA; FOLLOW-UP; HIV-1-INFECTED PATIENTS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; COLLABORATIVE ANALYSIS; PIMA CD4; COHORT; HIV; INITIATION; ANALYZER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0034319
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate, inexpensive point-of-care CD4+ T cell testing technologies are needed that can deliver CD4+ T cell results at lower level health centers or community outreach voluntary counseling and testing. We sought to evaluate a point-of-care CD4+ T cell counter, the Pima CD4 Test System, a portable, battery-operated bench-top instrument that is designed to use finger stick blood samples suitable for field use in conjunction with rapid HIV testing. Methods: Duplicate measurements were performed on both capillary and venous samples using Pima CD4 analyzers, compared to the BD FACSCalibur (reference method). The mean bias was estimated by paired Student's t-test. Bland Altman plots were used to assess agreement. Results: 206 participants were enrolled with a median CD4 count of 396 (range; 18-1500). The finger stick PIMA had a mean bias of -66.3 cells/mu L (95% CI -83-4-49.2, P<0.001) compared to the FACSCalibur; the bias was smaller at lower CD4 counts (0-250 cells/mL) with a mean bias of -10.8 (95% CI -27.3-+5.6, P = 0.198), and much greater at higher CD4 cell counts (>500 cells/mu L) with a mean bias of -120.6 (95% CI -162.8, -78.4, P<0.001). The sensitivity (95% CI) of the Pima CD4 analyzer was 96.3% (79.1-99.8%) for a <250 cells/ul cut-off with a negative predictive value of 99.2% (95.1-99.9%). Conclusions: The Pima CD4 finger stick test is an easy-to-use, portable, relatively fast device to test CD4+ T cell counts in the field. Issues of negatively-biased CD4 cell counts especially at higher absolute numbers will limit its utility for longitudinal immunologic response to ART. The high sensitivity and negative predictive value of the test makes it an attractive option for field use to identify patients eligible for ART, thus potentially reducing delays in linkage to care and ART initiation.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Experience from a pilot point-of-care CD4 enumeration programme in Kenya
    Mwau, Matilu
    Umuro, Mamo
    Odhiambo, Collins O.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 5 (02)
  • [22] High Baseline CD4 Counts and Antiretroviral Therapy Cessation Reply
    Zhao, Yan
    Wu, Zunyou
    McGoogan, Jennifer M.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 67 (04) : 644 - 645
  • [23] COST OF POINT-OF-CARE TEST PANEL FOR HIV POSITIVE PATIENTS ON ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY
    Simeon, K.
    Dorward, J.
    Garrett, N.
    Barnabas, R.
    Drain, P.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 66 (01) : 82 - 83
  • [24] MEDICATION ADHERENCE AND CD4 RESPONSE IN PATIENTS RECEIVING ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY
    Omonaiye, O.
    Sani, T.
    Agu, K. A.
    Oqua, D.
    Isah, M. A.
    Olayemi, S.
    King, R. C.
    Wutoh, A. K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A95 - A95
  • [25] The routine paediatric human immunodeficiency virus visit as an intervention opportunity for failed maternal care, and use of point-of-care CD4 testing as an adjunct in determining antiretroviral therapy eligibility
    Picken, S. C.
    Williams, S.
    Harvey, J.
    Esser, M. M.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 29 (02) : 70 - 74
  • [26] A Prospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Point-of-Care VISITECT CD4 Advanced Disease Test in 7 Countries
    Gils, Tinne
    Hella, Jerry
    Jacobs, Bart K. M.
    Sossen, Bianca
    Mukoka, Madalo
    Muyoyeta, Monde
    Nakabugo, Elizabeth
    Van Nguyen, Hung
    Ubolyam, Sasiwimol
    Mace, Aurelien
    Vermeulen, Marcia
    Nyangu, Sarah
    Sanjase, Nsala
    Sasamalo, Mohamed
    Dinh, Huong Thi
    Ngo, The Anh
    Manosuthi, Weerawat
    Jirajariyavej, Supunnee
    Denkinger, Claudia M.
    Nguyen, Nhung Viet
    Avihingsanon, Anchalee
    Nakiyingi, Lydia
    Szekely, Rita
    Kerkhoff, Andrew D.
    MacPherson, Peter
    Meintjes, Graeme
    Reither, Klaus
    Ruhwald, Morten
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024,
  • [27] Can we justify use of a CD4 point-of-care test in a time of austerity?
    Pizzo, E.
    Jones, C.
    Obi, A.
    Hart, C.
    Vera, J.
    Mackie, N.
    Bailey, A.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2013, 14 : 13 - 13
  • [28] Micro-a-fluidics ELISA for Rapid CD4 Cell Count at the Point-of-Care
    ShuQi Wang
    Savas Tasoglu
    Paul Z. Chen
    Michael Chen
    Ragip Akbas
    Sonya Wach
    Cenk Ibrahim Ozdemir
    Umut Atakan Gurkan
    Francoise F. Giguel
    Daniel R. Kuritzkes
    Utkan Demirci
    Scientific Reports, 4
  • [29] CD4 point-of-care testing improves patient satisfaction and reduces recalls to clinic
    Obi, A.
    Jones, C.
    Pizzo, E.
    Vera, J.
    Hart, C.
    Mackie, N.
    Bailey, A.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2013, 14 : 1 - 2
  • [30] Point-of-Care CD4 Testing to Inform Selection of Antiretroviral Medications in South African Antenatal Clinics: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
    Ciaranello, Andrea L.
    Myer, Landon
    Kelly, Kathleen
    Christensen, Sarah
    Daskilewicz, Kristen
    Doherty, Katie
    Bekker, Linda-Gail
    Hou, Taige
    Wood, Robin
    Francke, Jordan A.
    Wools-Kaloustian, Kara
    Freedberg, Kenneth A.
    Walensky, Rochelle P.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (03):