Evaluation of Portable Point-of-Care CD4 Counter with High Sensitivity for Detecting Patients Eligible for Antiretroviral Therapy

被引:50
|
作者
Manabe, Yukari C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yaping [2 ]
Elbireer, Ali [3 ,4 ]
Auerbach, Brandon [1 ]
Castelnuovo, Barbara [1 ]
机构
[1] Makerere Coll Hlth Sci, Infect Dis Inst, Kampala, Uganda
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Makerere Univ,Clin Core Lab, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2012年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
SOUTH-AFRICA; FOLLOW-UP; HIV-1-INFECTED PATIENTS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; COLLABORATIVE ANALYSIS; PIMA CD4; COHORT; HIV; INITIATION; ANALYZER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0034319
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate, inexpensive point-of-care CD4+ T cell testing technologies are needed that can deliver CD4+ T cell results at lower level health centers or community outreach voluntary counseling and testing. We sought to evaluate a point-of-care CD4+ T cell counter, the Pima CD4 Test System, a portable, battery-operated bench-top instrument that is designed to use finger stick blood samples suitable for field use in conjunction with rapid HIV testing. Methods: Duplicate measurements were performed on both capillary and venous samples using Pima CD4 analyzers, compared to the BD FACSCalibur (reference method). The mean bias was estimated by paired Student's t-test. Bland Altman plots were used to assess agreement. Results: 206 participants were enrolled with a median CD4 count of 396 (range; 18-1500). The finger stick PIMA had a mean bias of -66.3 cells/mu L (95% CI -83-4-49.2, P<0.001) compared to the FACSCalibur; the bias was smaller at lower CD4 counts (0-250 cells/mL) with a mean bias of -10.8 (95% CI -27.3-+5.6, P = 0.198), and much greater at higher CD4 cell counts (>500 cells/mu L) with a mean bias of -120.6 (95% CI -162.8, -78.4, P<0.001). The sensitivity (95% CI) of the Pima CD4 analyzer was 96.3% (79.1-99.8%) for a <250 cells/ul cut-off with a negative predictive value of 99.2% (95.1-99.9%). Conclusions: The Pima CD4 finger stick test is an easy-to-use, portable, relatively fast device to test CD4+ T cell counts in the field. Issues of negatively-biased CD4 cell counts especially at higher absolute numbers will limit its utility for longitudinal immunologic response to ART. The high sensitivity and negative predictive value of the test makes it an attractive option for field use to identify patients eligible for ART, thus potentially reducing delays in linkage to care and ART initiation.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance evaluation of the MBio Diagnostics point-of-care CD4 counter
    Logan, Cathy
    Givens, Monique
    Ives, Jeffrey T.
    Delaney, Marie
    Lochhead, Michael J.
    Schooley, Robert T.
    Benson, Constance A.
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 387 (1-2) : 107 - 113
  • [2] The Reliability of Point-of-Care CD4 Testing in Identifying HIV-Infected Pregnant Women Eligible for Antiretroviral Therapy
    Mnyani, Coceka N.
    McIntyre, James A.
    Myer, Landon
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2012, 60 (03) : 260 - 264
  • [3] Evaluation of PIMA Point-of-care CD4 Analyzer in Yunnan, China
    Liang Jun
    Duan Song
    Ma Yan-Ling
    Wang Ji-Bao
    Su Ying-Zhen
    Zhang Hui
    Ou Chin-Yih
    Hao Ling
    Qi Ming-Shan
    Bulterys Marc
    Westerman Larry
    Jiang Yan
    Xiao Yao
    中华医学杂志(英文版), 2015, (07) : 890 - 895
  • [4] Evaluation of PIMA Point-of-care CD4 Analyzer in Yunnan, China
    Liang, Jun
    Duan, Song
    Ma, Yan-Ling
    Wang, Ji-Bao
    Su, Ying-Zhen
    Zhang, Hui
    Ou, Chin-Yih
    Hao, Ling
    Qi, Ming-Shan
    Bulterys, Marc
    Westerman, Larry
    Jiang, Yan
    Xiao, Yao
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 128 (07) : 890 - 895
  • [5] Validation of point-of-care CD4 tests in pregnancy
    Chen, L-J
    Ford, T.
    Metcalf, R.
    Smith, J.
    Taylor, G.
    Croucher, A.
    Smith, C.
    Fidler, S.
    Reid, S.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2012, 13 : 60 - 61
  • [6] Evaluation of the PIMA Point-of-Care CD4 Analyzer in VCT Clinics in Zimbabwe
    Mtapuri-Zinyowera, Sekesai
    Chideme, Memory
    Mangwanya, Douglas
    Mugurungi, Owen
    Gudukeya, Stephano
    Hatzold, Karin
    Mangwiro, Alexio
    Bhattacharya, Gaurav
    Lehe, Jonathan
    Peter, Trevor
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2010, 55 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [7] Field Evaluation of PIMA Point-of-Care CD4 Testing in Rakai, Uganda
    Galiwango, Ronald M.
    Lubyayi, Lawrence
    Musoke, Richard
    Kalibbala, Sarah
    Buwembo, Martin
    Kasule, Jjingo
    Serwadda, David
    Gray, Ronald H.
    Reynolds, Steven J.
    Chang, Larry W.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [8] CD4 Cell Responses to Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in Patients Starting Therapy at High CD4 Cell Counts
    Wright, Stephen T.
    Carr, Andrew
    Woolley, Ian
    Giles, Michelle
    Hoy, Jennifer
    Cooper, David A.
    Law, Matthew G.
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2011, 58 (01) : 72 - 79
  • [9] Performance evaluation of the novel portable PIMA point-of-care CD4 analyzer in comparison with conventional flow cytometer instruments in Cameroon
    Bertrand Sagnia
    Rachel Kamgaing
    Charles Kouanfack
    Georgette Kamdem
    Samuel Sosso
    Edith Temgoua
    Zéphyrin Tsomo
    Lucille Mabouli Zoa
    Charlotte Tangimpundu
    Godwin Nchinda
    Alexis Ndjolo
    Translational Medicine Communications, 5 (1)
  • [10] Point-of-care CD4 testing: Differentiated care for the most vulnerable
    Spooner, Elizabeth
    Reddy, Tarylee
    Mchunu, Nobuhle
    Reddy, Shabashini
    Daniels, Brodie
    Ngomane, Noluthando
    Luthuli, Nozipho
    Kiepiela, Photini
    Cousoudis, Anna
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2022, 12