Quantifying uncertainty in transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo using discrete Markov models

被引:11
|
作者
Heck, Daniel W. [1 ]
Overstall, Antony M. [2 ,3 ]
Gronau, Quentin F. [4 ]
Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Stat Modeling Psychol, Mannheim, Germany
[2] Univ Southampton, Sch Math Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[3] Univ Southampton, Southampton Stat Sci Res Inst, Southampton, Hants, England
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Reversible jump MCMC; Product space MCMC; Bayesian model selection; Posterior model probabilities; Bayes factor; CONVERGENCE ASSESSMENT; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11222-018-9828-0
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Bayesian analysis often concerns an evaluation of models with different dimensionality as is necessary in, for example, model selection or mixture models. To facilitate this evaluation, transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) relies on sampling a discrete indexing variable to estimate the posterior model probabilities. However, little attention has been paid to the precision of these estimates. If only few switches occur between the models in the transdimensional MCMC output, precision may be low and assessment based on the assumption of independent samples misleading. Here, we propose a new method to estimate the precision based on the observed transition matrix of the model-indexing variable. Assuming a first-order Markov model, the method samples from the posterior of the stationary distribution. This allows assessment of the uncertainty in the estimated posterior model probabilities, model ranks, and Bayes factors. Moreover, the method provides an estimate for the effective sample size of the MCMC output. In two model selection examples, we show that the proposed approach provides a good assessment of the uncertainty associated with the estimated posterior model probabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 643
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying uncertainty in transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo using discrete Markov models
    Daniel W. Heck
    Antony M. Overstall
    Quentin F. Gronau
    Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
    [J]. Statistics and Computing, 2019, 29 : 631 - 643
  • [2] Seismic inversion and uncertainty quantification using transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo method
    Zhu, Dehan
    Gibson, Richard
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2018, 83 (04) : R321 - R334
  • [3] Transdimensional transformation based Markov chain Monte Carlo
    Das, Moumita
    Bhattacharya, Sourabh
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS, 2019, 33 (01) : 87 - 138
  • [4] A geometric approach to transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo
    Petris, G
    Tardella, L
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2003, 31 (04): : 469 - 482
  • [5] Quantifying the uncertainty in the orbits of extrasolar planets with Markov chain Monte Carlo
    Ford, EB
    [J]. SEARCH FOR OTHER WORLDS, 2004, 713 : 27 - 30
  • [6] Bayesian analysis of the discovery process model using transdimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo
    Sinding-Larsen, R
    Xu, JZ
    [J]. GIS and Spatial Analysis, Vol 1and 2, 2005, : 1040 - 1045
  • [7] Joint Inference of Microsatellite Mutation Models, Population History and Genealogies Using Transdimensional Markov Chain Monte Carlo
    Wu, Chieh-Hsi
    Drummond, Alexei J.
    [J]. GENETICS, 2011, 188 (01) : 151 - U254
  • [8] Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation for Bayesian Hidden Markov Models
    Chan, Lay Guat
    Ibrahim, Adriana Irawati Nur Binti
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON QUANTITATIVE SCIENCES AND ITS APPLICATIONS (ICOQSIA 2016), 2016, 1782
  • [9] Bayesian choice among Markov models of ion channels using Markov chain Monte Carlo
    Hodgson, MEA
    Green, PJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1999, 455 (1989): : 3425 - 3448
  • [10] Quantifying parameter uncertainty in a coral reef model using Metropolis-Coupled Markov Chain Monte Carlo
    Clancy, Damian
    Tanner, Jason E.
    McWilliam, Stephen
    Spencer, Matthew
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2010, 221 (10) : 1337 - 1347