Mouse genome annotation by the RefSeq project

被引:13
|
作者
McGarvey, Kelly M. [1 ]
Goldfarb, Tamara [1 ]
Cox, Eric [1 ]
Farrell, Catherine M. [1 ]
Gupta, Tripti [1 ]
Joardar, Vinita S. [1 ]
Kodali, Vamsi K. [1 ]
Murphy, Michael R. [1 ]
O'Leary, Nuala A. [1 ]
Pujar, Shashikant [1 ]
Rajput, Bhanu [1 ]
Rangwala, Sanjida H. [1 ]
Riddick, Lillian D. [1 ]
Webb, David [1 ]
Wright, Mathew W. [1 ]
Murphy, Terence D. [1 ]
Pruitt, Kim D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Lib Med, Natl Ctr Biotechnol Informat, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
LANDSCAPE; RECEPTOR; DRAFT;
D O I
10.1007/s00335-015-9585-8
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Complete and accurate annotation of the mouse genome is critical to the advancement of research conducted on this important model organism. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) develops and maintains many useful resources to assist the mouse research community. In particular, the reference sequence (RefSeq) database provides high-quality annotation of multiple mouse genome assemblies using a combinatorial approach that leverages computation, manual curation, and collaboration. Implementation of this conservative and rigorous approach, which focuses on representation of only full-length and non-redundant data, produces high-quality annotation products. RefSeq records explicitly link sequences to current knowledge in a timely manner, updating public records regularly and rapidly in response to nomenclature updates, addition of new relevant publications, collaborator discussion, and user feedback. Whole genome re-annotation is also conducted at least every 12-18 months, and often more frequently in response to assembly updates or availability of informative data. This article highlights key features and advantages of RefSeq genome annotation products and presents an overview of NCBI processes to generate these data. Further discussion of NCBI's resources highlights useful features and the best methods for accessing our data.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 390
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Annotation confidence score for genome annotation: a genome comparison approach
    Yang, Youngik
    Gilbert, Donald
    Kim, Sun
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 26 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [42] Comparison of GENCODE and RefSeq gene annotation and the impact of reference geneset on variant effect prediction
    Frankish, Adam
    Uszczynska, Barbara
    Ritchie, Graham R. S.
    Gonzalez, Jose M.
    Pervouchine, Dmitri
    Petryszak, Robert
    Mudge, Jonathan M.
    Fonseca, Nuno
    Brazma, Alvis
    Guigo, Roderic
    Harrow, Jennifer
    [J]. BMC GENOMICS, 2015, 16
  • [43] Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation
    O'Leary, Nuala A.
    Wright, Mathew W.
    Brister, J. Rodney
    Ciufo, Stacy
    McVeigh, Diana Haddad Rich
    Rajput, Bhanu
    Robbertse, Barbara
    Smith-White, Brian
    Ako-Adjei, Danso
    Astashyn, Alexander
    Badretdin, Azat
    Bao, Yiming
    Blinkova, Olga
    Brover, Vyacheslav
    Chetvernin, Vyacheslav
    Choi, Jinna
    Cox, Eric
    Ermolaeva, Olga
    Farrell, Catherine M.
    Goldfarb, Tamara
    Gupta, Tripti
    Haft, Daniel
    Hatcher, Eneida
    Hlavina, Wratko
    Joardar, Vinita S.
    Kodali, Vamsi K.
    Li, Wenjun
    Maglott, Donna
    Masterson, Patrick
    McGarvey, Kelly M.
    Murphy, Michael R.
    O'Neill, Kathleen
    Pujar, Shashikant
    Rangwala, Sanjida H.
    Rausch, Daniel
    Riddick, Lillian D.
    Schoch, Conrad
    Shkeda, Andrei
    Storz, Susan S.
    Sun, Hanzhen
    Thibaud-Nissen, Francoise
    Tolstoy, Igor
    Tully, Raymond E.
    Vatsan, Anjana R.
    Wallin, Craig
    Webb, David
    Wu, Wendy
    Landrum, Melissa J.
    Kimchi, Avi
    Tatusova, Tatiana
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2016, 44 (D1) : D733 - D745
  • [44] Introducing RefSeq and LocusLink: curated human genome resources at the NCBI
    Pruitt, KD
    Katz, KS
    Sicotte, H
    Maglott, DR
    [J]. TRENDS IN GENETICS, 2000, 16 (01) : 44 - 47
  • [45] Citrus sinensis Annotation Project (CAP): A Comprehensive Database for Sweet Orange Genome
    Wang, Jia
    Chen, Dijun
    Lei, Yang
    Chang, Ji-Wei
    Hao, Bao-Hai
    Xing, Feng
    Li, Sen
    Xu, Qiang
    Deng, Xiu-Xin
    Chen, Ling-Ling
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [46] The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes
    Overbeek, R
    Begley, T
    Butler, RM
    Choudhuri, JV
    Chuang, HY
    Cohoon, M
    de Crécy-Lagard, V
    Diaz, N
    Disz, T
    Edwards, R
    Fonstein, M
    Frank, ED
    Gerdes, S
    Glass, EM
    Goesmann, A
    Hanson, A
    Iwata-Reuyl, D
    Jensen, R
    Jamshidi, N
    Krause, L
    Kubal, M
    Larsen, N
    Linke, B
    McHardy, AC
    Meyer, F
    Neuweger, H
    Olsen, G
    Olson, R
    Osterman, A
    Portnoy, V
    Pusch, GD
    Rodionov, DA
    Rückert, C
    Steiner, J
    Stevens, R
    Thiele, I
    Vassieva, O
    Ye, Y
    Zagnitko, O
    Vonstein, V
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 (17) : 5691 - 5702
  • [47] MUTANT MOUSE:: Bona fide biosimulator for the functional annotation of gene and genome networks
    Gondo, Yoichi
    [J]. IMMUNOINFORMATICS, 2008, : 179 - 194
  • [49] Annotation of the Arabidopsis genome
    Wortman, JR
    Haas, BJ
    Hannick, LI
    Smith, RK
    Maiti, R
    Ronning, CM
    Chan, AP
    Yu, CH
    Ayele, M
    Whitelaw, CA
    White, OR
    Town, CD
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 132 (02) : 461 - 468
  • [50] Human Genome Annotation
    Gerstein, Mark
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6053 : 50 - 51