Mouse genome annotation by the RefSeq project

被引：13

作者：

McGarvey, Kelly M. ^{[1
]}

Goldfarb, Tamara ^{[1
]}

Cox, Eric ^{[1
]}

Farrell, Catherine M. ^{[1
]}

Gupta, Tripti ^{[1
]}

Joardar, Vinita S. ^{[1
]}

Kodali, Vamsi K. ^{[1
]}

Murphy, Michael R. ^{[1
]}

O'Leary, Nuala A. ^{[1
]}

Pujar, Shashikant ^{[1
]}

Rajput, Bhanu ^{[1
]}

Rangwala, Sanjida H. ^{[1
]}

Riddick, Lillian D. ^{[1
]}

Webb, David ^{[1
]}

Wright, Mathew W. ^{[1
]}

Murphy, Terence D. ^{[1
]}

Pruitt, Kim D. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Natl Lib Med, Natl Ctr Biotechnol Informat, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894 USA

来源：

MAMMALIAN GENOME | 2015年 / 26卷 / 9-10期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

LANDSCAPE; RECEPTOR; DRAFT;

D O I：

10.1007/s00335-015-9585-8

中图分类号：

Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];

学科分类号：

071010 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

Complete and accurate annotation of the mouse genome is critical to the advancement of research conducted on this important model organism. The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) develops and maintains many useful resources to assist the mouse research community. In particular, the reference sequence (RefSeq) database provides high-quality annotation of multiple mouse genome assemblies using a combinatorial approach that leverages computation, manual curation, and collaboration. Implementation of this conservative and rigorous approach, which focuses on representation of only full-length and non-redundant data, produces high-quality annotation products. RefSeq records explicitly link sequences to current knowledge in a timely manner, updating public records regularly and rapidly in response to nomenclature updates, addition of new relevant publications, collaborator discussion, and user feedback. Whole genome re-annotation is also conducted at least every 12-18 months, and often more frequently in response to assembly updates or availability of informative data. This article highlights key features and advantages of RefSeq genome annotation products and presents an overview of NCBI processes to generate these data. Further discussion of NCBI's resources highlights useful features and the best methods for accessing our data.

引用

页码：379 / 390

页数：12

共 50 条

[31] Curated genome annotation of Oryza sativa ssp japonica and comparative genome analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana -: The Rice Annotation Project
Gojobori, Takashi
[J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2007, 17 (02) : 175 - 183
[32] A biologist's view of the Drosophila genome annotation assessment project
Ashburner, M
[J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (04) : 391 - 393
[33] The Riken mouse genome encyclopedia project
Hayashizaki, Y
[J]. COMPTES RENDUS BIOLOGIES, 2003, 326 (10-11) : 923 - 929
[34] Large-scale mutational analysis for the annotation of the mouse genome
Beckers, J
de Angelis, MH
[J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 6 (01) : 17 - 23
[35] EMPReSS: standardized phenotype screens for functional annotation of the mouse genome
Brown, SDM
Chambon, P
de Angelis, MH
[J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2005, 37 (11) : 1155 - 1155
[36] EMPReSS: standardized phenotype screens for functional annotation of the mouse genome
[J]. Nature Genetics, 2005, 37 : 1155 - 1155
[37] Comparison of GENCODE and RefSeq gene annotation and the impact of reference geneset on variant effect prediction
Adam Frankish
Barbara Uszczynska
Graham RS Ritchie
Jose M Gonzalez
Dmitri Pervouchine
Robert Petryszak
Jonathan M Mudge
Nuno Fonseca
Alvis Brazma
Roderic Guigo
Jennifer Harrow
[J]. BMC Genomics, 16
[38] The role of the laboratory mouse in the human genome project
Meisler, MH
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1996, 59 (04) : 764 - 771
[39] Genome annotation
Aubourg, S
Rouzé, P
[J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2001, 39 (3-4) : 181 - 193
[40] Manual Gene Ontology annotation workflow at the Mouse Genome Informatics Database
Drabkin, Harold J.
Blake, Judith A.
[J]. DATABASE-THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL DATABASES AND CURATION, 2012,

← 1 2 3 4 5 →